Try it with FreeBSD's UFS and FreeBSD 5.0's new UFS2 filesystems perhaps -
or I could!
Chris
On 1 Feb 2003, Greg Copeland wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:36, Dave Page wrote:
I intend to run the tests on a Dual PIII 1GHz box, with 1Gb of Non-ECC
RAM and a 20Gb (iirc) IDE disk. I will run
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 00:34, Adam Haberlach wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:27:31AM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:36, Dave Page wrote:
I intend to run the tests on a Dual PIII 1GHz box, with 1Gb of Non-ECC
RAM and a 20Gb (iirc) IDE disk. I will run on Windows
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 11:30:17AM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 00:34, Adam Haberlach wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:27:31AM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:36, Dave Page wrote:
Please go with XFS or ext3. There are a number of blessed and
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 February 2003 12:40
To: Greg Copeland
Cc: Dave Page; PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List; Tom Lane
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port powerfail testing
Try it with FreeBSD's UFS and FreeBSD 5.0's
Despite some people's thoughts that a powerfail test is of little use, I
going to spend some time doing one anyway because I think Tom's
arguments for it are valid. I have lashed together the attached test
program (the important bits are the setup, run and check functions) for
review before I
Dave Page kirjutas R, 31.01.2003 kell 22:36:
Despite some people's thoughts that a powerfail test is of little use, I
going to spend some time doing one anyway because I think Tom's
arguments for it are valid. I have lashed together the attached test
program (the important bits are the setup,
