Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At this point I think our first question is whether flex 2.5.31 is
correctly detecting a hole in the ecpg lexer rules that was missed by
flex 2.5.4, or whether the warning is simply wrong.
Yes, that's it. The big problem seems to be that flex does not
Tom Lane wrote:
Red Hat's still shipping 2.5.4a according to a quick look...
Well Red Hat's still ship Postgres 7.3.4 ...
I'm not considering anymore RH to be up to date with various versions
:-(
Gaetano
Not to jump immediately to RH's defense, but Fedora Core 2 (currently in
beta)
Tom Lane wrote:
Red Hat's still shipping 2.5.4a according to a quick look...
Well Red Hat's still ship Postgres 7.3.4 ...
I'm not considering anymore RH to be up to date with various versions
:-(
Gaetano
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:44:52AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I knew at the time that ecpg was the only one of our lexers in which
echo-to-stdout could conceivably be a reasonable default rule. But
since flex 2.5.4 did not complain, I went ahead and committed the
addition in ecpg as well as
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
/usr/bin/flex -o'pgc.c' pgc.l
pgc.l:979: warning, -s option given but default rule can be matched
That's interesting, because I get no such warning here. What version
of flex are you using? (Mine is 2.5.4)
regards, tom lane
Neil Conway wrote:
$ cd src/interfaces/ecpg
$ make
[ ... ]
bison -y -d preproc.y
mv -f y.tab.c ./preproc.c
mv -f y.tab.h ./preproc.h
/usr/bin/flex -o'pgc.c' pgc.l
pgc.l:979: warning, -s option given but default rule can be matched
FYI, I am not seeing this with my flex 2.5.4 and bison
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's interesting, because I get no such warning here. What version
of flex are you using? (Mine is 2.5.4)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/nconway]% flex --version
flex 2.5.31
(The flex 2.5.31-22 debian package)
-Neil
---(end of
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's interesting, because I get no such warning here. What version
of flex are you using? (Mine is 2.5.4)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/nconway]% flex --version
flex 2.5.31
Oh, that thing. We deliberately backed off of
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 05:22:59PM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
/usr/bin/flex -o'pgc.c' pgc.l
pgc.l:979: warning, -s option given but default rule can be matched
Hmm, maybe the change is that -s is now enabled by default. I just
didn't find any mention of this in the docs and no option to enable
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, maybe the change is that -s is now enabled by default.
Right. I inserted %option nodefault into pgc.l (and all our other
flex source files) a day or two ago, after realizing that it is a very
effective tool for catching missed cases in a set of lex
10 matches
Mail list logo
