On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Kris Jurka wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
turnip_moth is also a Solaris 9 box and doesn't seem have the same issue.
Kris, is there anything unusual installed on the box that would make it
behave like this?
Not sure what's going on here. I did a ma
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
turnip_moth is also a Solaris 9 box and doesn't seem have the same issue.
Kris, is there anything unusual installed on the box that would make it
behave like this?
Not sure what's going on here. I did a manual run of the ecpg tests and
it compl
Michael Meskes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:30:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording
should have broken every last man jack of 'em. And yet there's still
some green to be seen. I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg
te
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:30:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording
> should have broken every last man jack of 'em. And yet there's still
> some green to be seen. I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg
> test scaffolding. For i
Tom Lane wrote:
AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording
should have broken every last man jack of 'em. And yet there's still
some green to be seen. I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg
test scaffolding.
Yes. The buildfarm script uses the same logic as
