Josh Berkus wrote:
Tom, Robert, Simon,
What, are people just on edge because of the US election?
It looks to me like the commitfest system is going really well. Of
course, we'll see how long it takes to close out 8.4. But I think we're
in much better shape than we were for 8.3. We're even
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Nov 2008, at 06:57, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Tom, Robert, Simon,
What, are people just on edge because of the US election?
It looks to me like the commitfest system is going really well. Of
course, we'll see how long it takes to
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 08:07:13PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 04:21:30PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It looks to me like there are at least half a dozen patches submitted
in the last week that are pretty half-baked and fall into the category
of Let's submit
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unofficially, well done to everybody that submitted patches in time for
Commit Fest. The queue has grown significantly over last few days and
it's clear many people have been working very hard right up to the
deadline.
Well done? It seems to me that we
On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 14:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unofficially, well done to everybody that submitted patches in time for
Commit Fest. The queue has grown significantly over last few days and
it's clear many people have been working very hard right up
Tom,
Well done? It seems to me that we are right where we hoped not to be,
ie with a ton of barely-completed (if not self-admitted WIP) patches
dropped on us immediately before feature freeze. Today the commit fest
idea is looking like a failure.
If you don't want patches coming at given
Well done? It seems to me that we are right where we hoped not to be,
ie with a ton of barely-completed (if not self-admitted WIP) patches
dropped on us immediately before feature freeze. Today the commit fest
idea is looking like a failure.
If we actually manage to ship 8.4 within six
On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 16:21 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Well done? It seems to me that we are right where we hoped not to be,
ie with a ton of barely-completed (if not self-admitted WIP) patches
dropped on us immediately before feature freeze. Today the commit fest
idea is looking like a
Emmanuel Cecchet wrote:
Tom,
Well done? It seems to me that we are right where we hoped not to be,
ie with a ton of barely-completed (if not self-admitted WIP) patches
dropped on us immediately before feature freeze. Today the commit fest
idea is looking like a failure.
If you
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 16:21 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Well done? It seems to me that we are right where we hoped not to be,
ie with a ton of barely-completed (if not self-admitted WIP) patches
dropped on us immediately before feature freeze. Today the commit fest
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 04:21:30PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It looks to me like there are at least half a dozen patches submitted
in the last week that are pretty half-baked and fall into the category
of Let's submit something before the deadline for CommitFest, in the
hopes of being allowed
Without review, how can we determine the true state of a patch? I would
guess that you haven't done a review of all of them yourself to
determine that.
No, I'm talking about the comments that were made when submitting the
patch. A few people said things along the lines of this isn't really
Supposing this is true, one way to prevent that in future
commitfest-driven releases is to send them back as not ready this
time, and tell them they'll be 1st in line in the next go-round.
Agreed!
But I'll be as happy as anyone if it doesn't come to that.
...Robert
--
Sent via
Tom, Robert, Simon,
What, are people just on edge because of the US election?
It looks to me like the commitfest system is going really well. Of
course, we'll see how long it takes to close out 8.4. But I think we're
in much better shape than we were for 8.3. We're even in better shape
to
14 matches
Mail list logo
