On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks good, but how about adding:
if (!RecoveryInProgress())
On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
If so, let's change
the name.
*None* of these names are intuitive. So let's just go for consistency.
If you want an intuitive name, it would be:
pg_replication_log_timestamp()
--
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
If so, let's change
the name.
*None* of these names are intuitive. So let's just go for consistency.
OK. I
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
If so, let's change
the name.
*None* of
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks good, but how about adding:
if (!RecoveryInProgress())
PG_RETURN_NULL();
Otherwise, if we're in Hot Standby mode for a while and then enter
normal running, wouldn't this still return a (stale) value?
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks good, but how about adding:
if (!RecoveryInProgress())
PG_RETURN_NULL();
Otherwise, if we're in Hot Standby mode for a while and
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
After 9.0 release, I've
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
After 9.0 release, I've often heard that some people want to know
how far transactions have been
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
After 9.0 release, I've often heard that some people want to know
how far transactions have been replayed in the standby in timestamp
rather than LSN. So I'm thinking to
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
After 9.0 release, I've often heard that some people want to know
how far transactions have been replayed in the standby in timestamp
rather than LSN. So I'm thinking to include the function which returns
the timestamp of the last applied transaction
11 matches
Mail list logo
