Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-09 Thread Fujii Masao
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
 This looks good, but how about adding:

 if (!RecoveryInProgress())
    PG_RETURN_NULL();

 Otherwise, if we're in Hot Standby mode for a while and then enter
 normal running, wouldn't this still return a (stale) value?

 Yes, but isn't that (stale) value useful to check how far WAL records
 have been replayed, *after failover*?

 Oh, OK.  I guess that makes sense.  One other question - should we say
 pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp() rather than
 pg_xact_last_replay_timestamp(), for consistency with
 pg_last_xlog_replay_location()?

Yeah, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp was my first idea. But, for me
(with poor English),
that sounded to return the timestamp of when the last transaction has
been replayed in
the standby, rather than the timestamp of the last replayed
transaction (i.e., when the
last replayed transaction has been committed in the master). So I
didn't choose that name.

But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
If so, let's change
the name.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-09 Thread Josh Berkus
On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
 But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
 If so, let's change
 the name.

*None* of these names are intuitive.  So let's just go for consistency.

If you want an intuitive name, it would be:

pg_replication_log_timestamp()

-- 
  -- Josh Berkus
 PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
 http://www.pgexperts.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-09 Thread Fujii Masao
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
 On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
 But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
 If so, let's change
 the name.

 *None* of these names are intuitive.  So let's just go for consistency.

OK. I changed the name to pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp_v1.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-09 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
 On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
 But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
 If so, let's change
 the name.

 *None* of these names are intuitive.  So let's just go for consistency.

 OK. I changed the name to pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-09 Thread Fujii Masao
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
 On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
 But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
 If so, let's change
 the name.

 *None* of these names are intuitive.  So let's just go for consistency.

 OK. I changed the name to pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp.

 Committed.

Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-08 Thread Fujii Masao
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
 This looks good, but how about adding:

 if (!RecoveryInProgress())
    PG_RETURN_NULL();

 Otherwise, if we're in Hot Standby mode for a while and then enter
 normal running, wouldn't this still return a (stale) value?

Yes, but isn't that (stale) value useful to check how far WAL records
have been replayed, *after failover*?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
 This looks good, but how about adding:

 if (!RecoveryInProgress())
    PG_RETURN_NULL();

 Otherwise, if we're in Hot Standby mode for a while and then enter
 normal running, wouldn't this still return a (stale) value?

 Yes, but isn't that (stale) value useful to check how far WAL records
 have been replayed, *after failover*?

Oh, OK.  I guess that makes sense.  One other question - should we say
pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp() rather than
pg_xact_last_replay_timestamp(), for consistency with
pg_last_xlog_replay_location()?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
 dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
 Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
 After 9.0 release, I've often heard that some people want to know
 how far transactions have been replayed in the standby in timestamp
 rather than LSN. So I'm thinking to include the function which returns
 the timestamp of the last applied transaction (i.e., commit/abort WAL
 record) in the core.

 Name: pg_last_replay_xact_timestamp (better name?)
 Return Type: timestamp with time zone

 Thought?

 How do you want to implement the tracking?

 I'm thinking to just expose GetLatestXTime(), i.e., 
 XLogCtl-recoveryLastXTime.

 I attached the patch.

This looks good, but how about adding:

if (!RecoveryInProgress())
PG_RETURN_NULL();

Otherwise, if we're in Hot Standby mode for a while and then enter
normal running, wouldn't this still return a (stale) value?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-04 Thread Fujii Masao
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
 dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
 Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
 After 9.0 release, I've often heard that some people want to know
 how far transactions have been replayed in the standby in timestamp
 rather than LSN. So I'm thinking to include the function which returns
 the timestamp of the last applied transaction (i.e., commit/abort WAL
 record) in the core.

 Name: pg_last_replay_xact_timestamp (better name?)
 Return Type: timestamp with time zone

 Thought?

 How do you want to implement the tracking?

 I'm thinking to just expose GetLatestXTime(), i.e., 
 XLogCtl-recoveryLastXTime.

I attached the patch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pg_last_replay_xact_timestamp_v1.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-03 Thread Fujii Masao
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
 Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
 After 9.0 release, I've often heard that some people want to know
 how far transactions have been replayed in the standby in timestamp
 rather than LSN. So I'm thinking to include the function which returns
 the timestamp of the last applied transaction (i.e., commit/abort WAL
 record) in the core.

 Name: pg_last_replay_xact_timestamp (better name?)
 Return Type: timestamp with time zone

 Thought?

 How do you want to implement the tracking?

I'm thinking to just expose GetLatestXTime(), i.e., XLogCtl-recoveryLastXTime.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] timestamp of the last replayed transaction

2010-11-02 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
 After 9.0 release, I've often heard that some people want to know
 how far transactions have been replayed in the standby in timestamp
 rather than LSN. So I'm thinking to include the function which returns
 the timestamp of the last applied transaction (i.e., commit/abort WAL
 record) in the core.

 Name: pg_last_replay_xact_timestamp (better name?)
 Return Type: timestamp with time zone

 Thought?

How do you want to implement the tracking? Will it look like the
proposal in this thread:

  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01209.php

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers