On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, sugumar wrote:
> class meeting123
> {
> public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception
> {
> Class.forName("postgresql.Driver");
This should be "org.postgresql.Driver"
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/btfwk/
We have Postgres 7.0.3 running on Red Hat 7.0. The JVM installed is from
Blackdown.org. We are using jdbc7.1_1.2.jar driver.
We are unable to use the JDBC2.0 methods.
For example:
we tried calling
DatabaseMetaData.supportsResultSetType(int) method
and ResultSet.absolute(int) method.
We are g
sir,
I am using the postgresql for storing the data
in linux machine but i can't connect the frontend
(java) using jdbc to the postgresql.I am using the
following code for connection.Please if u know how to
connect, send the information as soon as possible to
me.Send the connecting driver c
sir ,
i am using the
following code for connecting postgresql,but this code did not to the other
system database.please send the correct for the driver connection.
thanks,
regards
sugumar
import java.sql.*;import java.io.*;import
java.lang.*;import java.net.*;
class meeting123 {pub
Hi,
Tom C. and I exchanged a few emails about the issue offlist; Tom spotted after a while
that the PostgreSQL data had been clobbered by the output of my cron job (not possible
in normal conditions I guess)... end result being he suspects its a hardware glitch or
similar (also had 'wc' dump c
Title: More Timestamp issues...
I have yet another timestamp issue that I'm not sure how to resolve... I'm using Postgres 7.0.2. For some reason, I'm getting the following error:
Bad Timestamp Format at 19 in 2001-03-15 23:56:18.01+00
at org.postgresql.jdbc2.ResultSet.getTimestamp(R
Marko Kreen writes:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:50:04AM +0100, Peter Mount wrote:
> > At 13:04 27/03/01 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > >On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > > > 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> > > > (fo
Right; this should have gone elsewhere.
Please accept my sincere apologies.
Mihai Gheorghiu
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Shraibman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mihai Gheorghiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:45 PM
Subject: Re:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:50:04AM +0100, Peter Mount wrote:
> At 13:04 27/03/01 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > > 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> > > (for 4 substitutions). It seems un
Hi,
Peter, is that new? I have used SetLogStream with your 7.1 beta 5 driver and
7.03 Postgress but didn't see any output from queries that I didn't put there?
Or could it have to do with my server config that I didn't see anything? I
mean no query info, I did see info on the driver and on the c
Are there plans to implement the javax.sql.DataSource interface?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
At 12:01 27/03/01 -0800, Hunter Hillegas wrote:
>I'm having a problem with queries sent in from a Java program.
>
>Is there any way to have the server log the queries that are coming in so I
>can see what's actually getting processed?
From the server:
Can't remember which, but -d1 or -d2 when yo
At 13:04 27/03/01 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > Well Peter, I must say many would disagree with you there ;)
>
>* NSHO about ant deleted *
>
> > 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> > (for 4
At 10:37 27/03/01 +1000, Joe Shevland wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Semi-topical I hope ;)
Yes semi ;-)
> I've started using Postgres 7.1 (FreeBSD 4.2-S) and large objects via
> JDBC. (postmaster (PostgreSQL) 7.1beta5)
I'm forwarding this to the bugs list as it looks like something nasty in
the back end.
At 22:35 25/03/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Peter Mount writes:
>
> > At 14:21 25/03/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >Mike Cannon-Brookes writes:
> > >
> > > > tried to pull down the latest src and compile it but I can't. The build
> > > file
> > > > seems to filter properties like MAJ
At 10:47 26/03/01 +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
>IMHO make should not be needed at all?
>
>I've hard coded the numbers into the Ant script now and it works fine. Java
>users like myself have brains that go "ooh, build.xml, let me run ant" to
>compile things.
>
>Why do we need make? (I'm sure t
At 18:56 27/03/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Mike Cannon-Brookes writes:
>
> > 1) ant files are quickly becoming a standard for compiling almost all open
> > source java projects
>
>The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
>At PostgreSQL, we use the GNU-style b
17 matches
Mail list logo
