Re: [JDBC] Fw: jdbc.postgresql.org/docs/

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Mount
At 12:18 22/02/01 +0200, Lajos Malozsak wrote: >Hello, > >The JDBC documentation page cannot be found. The same thing was happend >when I tried to access the development and the tutorial pages. >Are those in construction or is a mistake ? Under construction ;-) I'm actually working on them a

[JDBC] Re: [DOCS] Java class documentation

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Mount
At 22:07 22/02/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >I've started to finish up the not-marked-up-yet parts of the JDBC >documentation, but most of this seems to have once been generated by >javadoc, and I feel like it is probably a wasted effort to try to manually >convert this to DocBook. Actually

[JDBC] Re: [DOCS] Java class documentation

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Mount
At 16:00 23/02/01 +, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > Could we for now remove the formal class documentation from the DocBook > > source, while keeping the narrative parts, and instead point people to the > > JavaDoc? Could we make prebuild class documentation in HTML available to > > users, maybe

Re: [JDBC] f is not a valid bitstring

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Mount
At 09:00 23/02/01 -0800, Skidmore, Walt wrote: >I have an entity bean that uses a boolean for a field, and that boolean >maps to a bit field in the database. Is this the proper field I should be >mapping to? Under Sybase and MSSQL 7, there were no problems with sending >"true" or "false" thr

[JDBC] Re: [INTERFACES] unable to find postgresql.jar

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Mount
At 22:49 21/02/01 -0800, Shankar Gowda wrote: >Hello sir/madam, > i have install postgresql 6.5.3 and unable to >configure the jdbc to it. >i have installed jdbc rpms and it gave me >/usr/lib/pgsql/jdbc6.5-1.1.jar and >/usr/lib/pgsql/jdbc6.5-1.2.jar. but, i could not find >where is postgresql.j

Re: [JDBC] RE: f is not a valid bitstring

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Mount
At 15:17 23/02/01 -0800, Skidmore, Walt wrote: >An update: I looked through the documentation, and found that the bool >type might be better suited. So, after changing the field type, I'm >getting a new error: > >java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: pg_atoi: error in "f": can't parse "f" Hmm, its tr

[JDBC] Re: [DOCS] Java class documentation

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Peter Mount writes: > Actually I was waiting until 7.1 was out before rewriting the jdbc docs > >from scratch (so much has changed since those were written). I can see that. However, 7.1 users should still get the benefit of reasonably up to date documentation. I've at least changed all packag

[JDBC] Concurrency supported?

2001-02-24 Thread Ingo Luetkebohle
Hiya, how good is concurrency supported in the JDBC driver? For example, if I have a small process with about 50 threads, some of them requesting large objects, will one JDBC connection suffice? If one thread is executing a large select which takes seconds to execute, will other threads be able t