So how whould I map the BLOB java type in the corresponding SQL type?
I want to create a table with a BLOB attribute, but I want that my code can
run for PostgreSQL, Oracle and other BD that handles BLOBs.
So first I had to map the BLOB in the corresponding BD SQL type and then
create the ta
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Barry Lind wrote:
> There are actually a couple of reasons why the jdbc driver can't do this:
>
> 1) The client doesn't know that the column being deleted is a blob. All
> it can know is that the data type of the column is oid. Oids can be
> used for many reasons, one of whi
> I actually consider the biggest problem the fact the the 'official'
> postgres jdbc website is very much out of date
> (http://jdbc.postgresql.org). (it doesn't even have the 7.1 drivers).
> I feel that either someone needs to maintain this page; or someone needs
> to create a new website a
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Barry Lind wrote:
> Anders,
>
> What aspects of BLOB support do you consider broken? Are these aspects
> that are broken in the JDBC layer or are 'broken' at the server layer?
Now I've looked at the code and located the problem:
The method setBinaryStream(...) in PreparedSt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Guys,
I cracked this problem. It is NOT a problem with the driver, or db. It is the
programmer (ie ME). The drive had ran out of space and I got this error. I
gave it more space and all is well again.
Regards,
Stephen.
On Thursday 02 Aug
hello.
my application uses large objects frequently...to render the main page, it
might load anywhere from zero to 10 large objects - mostly images or
documents. recently i started stress testing this page (making it always
load many LOs) and i frequently encounter two different problems.
1. fa
Please get newer driver from
http://jdbc.fastcrypt.com
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hello All,
>
> Does anyone know of any problems with the JDBC driver that could cause this
> error? After about 490is inserts of blobs, this error appears and will not
> allow me to insert any mo
Would someone summarize what items need to be added to the TODO list.
> Ricardo,
>
> There are many other issues with postgres blobs that will not allow you
> to acheive your goal easily. You are going to need different
> implementations per database type to deal with the differences between
Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is what I think needs to be done wrt large objects and binary data
> support ...
> [ much snipped ]
> As you can probably guess I don't like the current implementation of
> large objects in postgresql
Yup, I got that ;-).
While these seem like good
My guess is that this is unlikely to be the result of the ThreadLocal
issues and also I doubt 1.4 will have any effect. This sounds like a
memory leak which could be in the driver or in your application code. I
also doubt that the use of LIKE is the problem as the JDBC code doesn't
parse the
10 matches
Mail list logo
