Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is what I think needs to be done wrt large objects and binary data
> support ...
> [ much snipped ]
> As you can probably guess I don't like the current implementation of
> large objects in postgresql
Yup, I got that ;-).
While these seem like good changes in the long run, I'm concerned about
breaking existing client apps wholesale. Is it feasible to have a
backwards-compatibility mode? I wouldn't even insist that it be the
default behavior --- but adding a one-line "set backwards-compatible
mode" kind of call seems better than major rewrites, for apps that
depend on the old behavior.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
