Bruce,
On 7/15/05 9:59 PM, "Bruce Momjian" wrote:
> Actually, mine returns ')' too for the last command. I didn't copy
> that into the email. How about the top tests? Notice I get an error on
> the first one without the backslash. Are you OK escaping '(' but not
> ')'? That might be a solu
Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Bruce,
> > I found that parentheses in gawk regular expressions require backslashes
> > so they are not treated as regex groupings:
> >
> > $ echo '('|awk '$0 ~ /(/ {print $0}'
> > awk: cmd. line:1: fatal: Unmatched ( or \(: /(/
> > $ echo '('|awk '$0 ~ /\(/ {print $0}'
> >
Bruce,
> I found that parentheses in gawk regular expressions require backslashes
> so they are not treated as regex groupings:
>
> $ echo '('|awk '$0 ~ /(/ {print $0}'
> awk: cmd. line:1: fatal: Unmatched ( or \(: /(/
> $ echo '('|awk '$0 ~ /\(/ {print $0}'
> (
> Now, it seems closing parenthe
After studying Fortuna more, I found out that I missed
some of the details.
- reseeding should happen only if pool #0 has aquired additional
entropy.
- a 'rekeying' operation should happend after each request and
also after 1M of extracted data. That means taking next two
blocks and using
- reformat in asciidoc syntax
- clarify various parts
- add high-level description of PGP structure
- add a comparison of crypt vs. regular hashes
Index: pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/README.pgcrypto
===
*** pgsql.orig/contrib/pgcrypto/READ
- Fix couple comments.
- internal.c didnt clean hash contexts when freeing
- zero the system randomness buffer too
- Google tells that we can use /dev/urandom on Cygwin,
HPUX and AIX. Add them to random.c
- remove a debug reference from pgp.h
Index: pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/fortuna.c
===
Those 3 patches hopefully end my pgcrypto patch-bombing.
(Well, at least I am offline next couple weeks...)
1. Small fixes
2. Fortuna fixes
3. New README
There are 3 important points about new readme:
* It is formatted for use by asciidoc. To be able to generate
html from it. As I consider t
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When writing this patch it occurred to me that we nuke our
> member-of-role cache for one-off lookups on occation. I don't
> particularly like that, especially when we *know* it's a one-off lookup,
Yeah. What I had been thinking about is that maybe it
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Attached please find a patch to change how the permissions checking
> > for alter-owner is done. With roles there can be more than one
> > 'owner' of an object and therefore it becomes sensible to allow
> >
Eugen Nedelcu wrote:
> The new code is broken. Please test it with resonably large tables.
> Do not test it with querys like: select -132323435.34343;
>
> If I use a query like:
>
> select * from my_table limit 100;
>
> I can't see anything on my screen until I hit CTRL^C
>
> If I use a pager (
I believe this change will apply equally to 7.4, 8.0, and CVS HEAD.
Index: FAQ_AIX
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/FAQ_AIX,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -c -u -r1.11 FAQ_AIX
--- FAQ_AIX 12 Nov 2002 20:02:32 -
The attached (new) src/test/regress/expected/geometry_9.out, intended
only for the 7.3 stable branch, allows a clean regression pass on my
FC4 box. I called it that to avoid conflicts with other geometry_n files
on later branches.
The attached patch for contrib/seg/segparse.y allows a clean
Titus von Boxberg wrote:
Having read the FAQ, it's not clear to me, where the patches go (and when)
that I would send into this list.
These are my open questions:
Are the patches applied to HEAD?
It depends on the patch. New features are almost exclusively only
applied to HEAD, whereas patche
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Not from me. You missed the 8.1 freeze by about two weeks, so I'm not
> > sure if this is a candidate for 8.1 though.
>
> Not a chance.
>
> regards, tom
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not from me. You missed the 8.1 freeze by about two weeks, so I'm not
> sure if this is a candidate for 8.1 though.
Not a chance.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: H
Titus von Boxberg wrote:
What do you mean by "right syntax". There are hundreds of examples
in programming languages where a "small" syntactic difference leads to
totally different semantics.
Well, I'm just not happy that "foo.bar" means something completely
different than "foo%bar" -- foo%ba
16 matches
Mail list logo
