On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Affan Salman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With some time to spare, I thought I'd submit a quick-fix patch to the
issue I reported here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-07/msg00339.php
I don't think this is right. If the original
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 3/8/06, Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, however there are two slightly separate discussions going on and I
think you're taking them as a single discussion.
I agree that there are two discussions happening in this thread, but I
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 3/8/06, Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What feature though? Part of the definition of a feature like synonym has
to nail down things like how it interacts with search path
I've said how it interacts with the search path
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Hans-J?rgen Sch?nig wrote:
The semantics of namespace search seem wrong; I would think that a
synonym in schema A should mask a table in schema B if A precedes B
on the search path, but this doesn't work that way.
good point.
any other opionions here?
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 3/7/06, Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd personally be more interested in what the impact is on people not
using synonyms. How free is any search for synonyms if you aren't using
the feature?
Unless synonym enablement were
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 3/7/06, Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd personally be more interested in what the impact is on people not
using synonyms. How free is any search
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Stephan Szabo wrote:
Here's my current work in progress for 8.1 devel related to fixing the
timing issues with referential actions having their checks run on
intermediate states. I've only put in a simple test that failed against
8.0 in the regression patch
Here's my current work in progress for 8.1 devel related to fixing the
timing issues with referential actions having their checks run on
intermediate states. I've only put in a simple test that failed against
8.0 in the regression patch and regression still passes for me. There's
still an
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
That would answer the big question here, but where does it say that?
Also, if you really insist on an authoritative statement, try this text
(from Annex D of the C99 draft standard, Formal model of sequence
points):
Thank
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Sean Chittenden wrote:
The patch treats any non-zero value as true. Is that the behavior we
want, or should we only allow 1 as an integer representation of
true? (I'm not sure myself, I just don't think copying C here is
necessarily the best guide.)
I would posit
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Czuczy Gergely wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:39:38AM -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Czuczy Gergely wrote:
I've attached a corrected patch, the postgresql.pc.in was missing.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 01:49:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I'd suggest something along the lines of
NOTICE: foreign key constraint constrname will require a cross-type conversion
DETAIL: key columns fkcol and pkcol are of different types integer and
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I create a plpgsql function for grant rights for the postgres users.
The same function is working properly in the previous versions. But it
gives the following error message.
You're not putting in the schema names in your grant statements so
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know of a memcpy() implementation that would actually bail out
if called with two equal pointers, but perhaps there is one in
existence somewhere.
This isn't a bug, and I see no reason to clutter the code
Here's a patch that adds some text mentioning that
RESTRICT is not deferrable to the create table reference
page.Index: doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml
===
RCS file:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Can you tell me what Win32 compile environment can't handle a sizeof()
as a function parameter?
! GetUserName(pw-pw_name, sizeof(pw-pw_name)-1);
Does casting to DWORD help?
! GetUserName(pw-pw_name, pwname_size);
It looks like the
16 matches
Mail list logo
