Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As outlined in my email, step 1 is to move pg_autovacuum from contrib to
src/bin. Attached is a patch that modifies src/bin/Makefile and the
pg_autovacuum Makefile which will be in src/bin/pg_autovacuum/Makefile
once the pg_autovacuum directory is
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
The only reason I put it in src/bin is because I thought people
wanted pg_autovacuum to still be a runable stand alone app.
I see no reason for that. If it's integrated as a postmaster child,
then it is run in a daemon-like mode automatically.
But, I
guess there
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 02:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
The only reason I put it in src/bin is because I thought people
wanted pg_autovacuum to still be a runable stand alone app.
I see no reason for that. If it's integrated as a postmaster child,
then it is run
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 02:15, Tom Lane wrote:
Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As outlined in my email, step 1 is to move pg_autovacuum from contrib to
src/bin. Attached is a patch that modifies src/bin/Makefile and the
pg_autovacuum Makefile which will be in
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2004 09:44
To: Matthew T. O'Connor
Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-patches
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Moving pg_autovacuum from contrib to src/bin
It is supposed to be linked into the postmaster and forked from
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 11:04, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is supposed to be linked into the postmaster and forked from there.
In the current state of pg_autovacuum it wouldn't matter a lot, but
I am assuming that we will soon migrate it to depend on being
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
I did understand Tom, but based on the hacker discussion I think the
postmaster integration will consist of the postmaster launching and
killing the pg_autovacuum standalone executable as required. In that
sense, I don't
On Sat, 29 May 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 11:04, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is supposed to be linked into the postmaster and forked from there.
In the current state of pg_autovacuum it wouldn't matter a lot, but
I am assuming that we
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 15:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
I can wait, but I am really trying not to miss the feature freeze which
AFAIK, is still happening in a few days. Is that changing? Will I have
time if I wait a few days? Especially given
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 01:31, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Having no response from my email to hackers yesterday, I will assume
(hope) that no news is good news and proceed onwards.
As outlined in my email, step 1 is to move pg_autovacuum from contrib to
src/bin. Attached is a patch that
10 matches
Mail list logo
