Hi all,
here's a patch aimed at moving along the fork/exec development. It is not
yet complete or ready for submission, but would like comments at this stage
from the postgres developer community.
The places of particular interest are denoted by "FIXME: [fork/exec]",
however, some things I'd lik
Bruce,
Thanks for the comments/questions. A couple
of points in response:
1. About the #if defined (_HP_aCC) ||
defined (_HP_cc)
We agree. That line can go.
2. About the TMPFILE definition change from
.c to .h: Unfortunately, the -V option does not
work the same way across HP c
[sNip]
> ISO 8601 gives more specific names.
>
> ISO 8601 Basic Format: P2Y10M15DT10H20M30S
> ISO 8601 Alternative Format: P00021015T102030
> ISO 8601 Extended Format: P0002-10-15T10:20:30
>
> In a way, the Extended Format is kinda nice, since its
> almost human readable.
>
It just struck me that *maybe* a portable solution would be to put the
awk output inside genbki.sh in a .h file and then #include it in a one
line .c file which is passed to the preprocessor. Would that keep the
(strange) HP compiler happy?
cheers
andrew
ViSolve Open Source Team wrote:
**
This patch properly sets the prototype for the on_shmem_exit and
on_proc_exit functions, and adjust all other related code to use
the proper types too.
Kurt
Index: src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/p
ViSolve Open Source Team wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> Thanks for the comments/questions. A couple of points in response:
>
> 1. About the #if defined (_HP_aCC) || defined (_HP_cc)
>
> We agree. That line can go.
OK.
> 2. About the TMPFILE definition change from .c to .h: Unfortunately, the -V opti
Randolf Richardson wrote:
> [sNip]
> > ISO 8601 gives more specific names.
> >
> > ISO 8601 Basic Format: P2Y10M15DT10H20M30S
> > ISO 8601 Alternative Format: P00021015T102030
> > ISO 8601 Extended Format: P0002-10-15T10:20:30
> >
> > In a way, the Extended Format is kinda ni
Sorry all... I'll repost with a context diff when I get a chance.
-Original Message-
From: Claudio Natoli
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 12/10/03 12:28 AM
Subject: [PATCHES] Comments requested on attached fork/exec patch
Hi all,
here's a patch aimed at moving along the fork/exec developm