> Attached patch solves the problem for me.Didn't see anything of the
> problem you described about hangs in my implementation. Probably
because
> mine exits at the first sign of a linebreak.
I confirmed the fix. 8.0.0 now starts up with net start (this is where
I first noticed the problem). Whe
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached patch solves the problem for me.Didn't see anything of the
> problem you described about hangs in my implementation. Probably because
> mine exits at the first sign of a linebreak.
Applied with some trivial legibility improvements.
Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's the *fixed* patch it's up to you wich one to
> use.
I applied this one.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an i
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just noticed that this uses the current database Id in the LOCKTAG ...
> I think I'll just make it use InvalidOid, as we will only use it to lock
> shared objects by now. It can be changed when (and if) we need
> different semantics in the future.
In
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is the LockObject patch I was able to come up with. It's almost
> the same patch that Rod Taylor published two years ago; basically, it
> expands LOCKTAG with a ClassId attribute, and provides a LockObject
> method to allow locking arbitrary object
Hi all,
Here is the last update for french .po files.
Please apply to current branch. Thanks.
--
Guillaume.
pg_resetxlog-fr.po.bz2
Description: application/bzip
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:09:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is the LockObject patch I was able to come up with. It's almost
> > the same patch that Rod Taylor published two years ago; basically, it
> > expands LOCKTAG with a ClassId attribute, an
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:09:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Here is the LockObject patch I was able to come up with. It's almost
> > > the same patch that Rod Taylor published two years ago; basically, it
> > > expands LOCK
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:52:57PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> When we roll over OID's do we make sure we never return InvalidOid?
Yes. From GetNewObjectId()
/*
* Check for wraparound of the OID counter. We *must* not return 0
* (InvalidOid); and as long as we have
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:09:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wonder whether it wouldn't be possible to clean up the "XactLockTable"
>> kluge with this --- ie, instead of denoting transaction locks by a
>> special relation ID, denote them by a special c
I need someone who understands UTF8 and perl to review this before being
applied.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it
Moved:
This has been saved for the 8.1 release:
http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
---
David Kamholz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's a patch I added against plperl, originally against beta5, now
> agains
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need someone who understands UTF8 and perl to review this before being
> applied.
I looked at it and felt that we couldn't risk it for 8.0 --- although
the patch looks simple enough, we don't really know the consequences for
compatibility with differen
No problem. Moved to 8.1 patches queue.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I need someone who understands UTF8 and perl to review this before being
> > applied.
>
> I looked at it and felt
14 matches
Mail list logo
