Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have been thinking we could improve how quickly VACUUM can expire rows
if we update procArray.xmin more frequently for non-SERIALIZABLE
transactions.
The attached patch updates procArray.xmin in this manner.
This
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems to me a lot cleaner to do the reference counting like Tom
> suggested. Increase the refcount on CopySnapshot, and decrease it on
> FreeSnapshot. Assuming that all callers of CopySnapshot free the
> snapshot with FreeSnapshot when they're
Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It seems to me a lot cleaner to do the reference counting like Tom
> > suggested. Increase the refcount on CopySnapshot, and decrease it on
> > FreeSnapshot. Assuming that all callers of CopySnapshot free the
> > snapshot with
I have researched this problem, and the incorrect behavior seems to be
totally caused by the fact that unquoted commas are treated as item
separators in pg_hba.conf.
I have updated the documentation in 8.2 and CVS HEAD to indicate that
the LDAP URL should be double-quoted, and double-quoted the e
> OTOH, do we have any evidence that this is worth bothering with at all?
> I fear that the cases of long-running transactions that are problems
> in the real world wouldn't be helped much --- for instance, pg_dump
> wouldn't change behavior because it uses a serializable transaction.
Well I think
>> Did Greg push a version which didn't carry the "WIP" label to it? As
>> far as I remember he was still asking how to make the Sort and Limit
>> nodes communicate.
>
> Good question. I asked for a new version of this patch and the WIP was
> only in the email subject line. Greg, is this ready fo
Gregory Stark wrote:
> >> Did Greg push a version which didn't carry the "WIP" label to it? As
> >> far as I remember he was still asking how to make the Sort and Limit
> >> nodes communicate.
> >
> > Good question. I asked for a new version of this patch and the WIP was
> > only in the email sub
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
IT
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
IT
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Ch
Newest version added:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
-
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
IT
12 matches
Mail list logo
