On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 15:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> > I can wait, but I am really trying not to miss the feature freeze which
> > AFAIK, is still happening in a few days. Is that changing? Will I have
> > time if I wait a few days? Especially g
On Sat, 29 May 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 11:04, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It is supposed to be linked into the postmaster and forked from there.
In the current state of pg_autovacuum it wouldn't matter a lot, but
I am assuming that we
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
>> I did understand Tom, but based on the hacker discussion I think the
>> "postmaster integration" will consist of the postmaster launching and
>> killing the pg_autovacuum standalone executable as required. In that
>> sens
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 11:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It is supposed to be linked into the postmaster and forked from there.
>
> In the current state of pg_autovacuum it wouldn't matter a lot, but
> I am assuming that we will soon migrate it to depend on b
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 May 2004 09:44
> To: Matthew T. O'Connor
> Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Moving pg_autovacuum from contrib to src/bin
>
>
> It is supposed to b
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 02:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As outlined in my email, step 1 is to move pg_autovacuum from contrib to
> > src/bin. Attached is a patch that modifies src/bin/Makefile and the
> > pg_autovacuum Makefile which will be in src/bin/
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> I did understand Tom, but based on the hacker discussion I think the
> "postmaster integration" will consist of the postmaster launching and
> killing the pg_autovacuum standalone executable as required. In that
> sense, I don't think it matters if pg_autovacuum is loc
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 02:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> > The only reason I put it in src/bin is because I thought people
> > wanted pg_autovacuum to still be a runable stand alone app.
>
> I see no reason for that. If it's integrated as a postmaster child,
> then it
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> The only reason I put it in src/bin is because I thought people
> wanted pg_autovacuum to still be a runable stand alone app.
I see no reason for that. If it's integrated as a postmaster child,
then it is run in a daemon-like mode automatically.
> But, I
> guess the
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As outlined in my email, step 1 is to move pg_autovacuum from contrib to
> src/bin. Attached is a patch that modifies src/bin/Makefile and the
> pg_autovacuum Makefile which will be in src/bin/pg_autovacuum/Makefile
> once the pg_autovacuum direc
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 01:31, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Having no response from my email to hackers yesterday, I will assume
> (hope) that no news is good news and proceed onwards.
>
> As outlined in my email, step 1 is to move pg_autovacuum from contrib to
> src/bin. Attached is a patch that m
Having no response from my email to hackers yesterday, I will assume
(hope) that no news is good news and proceed onwards.
As outlined in my email, step 1 is to move pg_autovacuum from contrib to
src/bin. Attached is a patch that modifies src/bin/Makefile and the
pg_autovacuum Makefile which will
12 matches
Mail list logo
