Re: [PATCHES] Consistent timestamp input

2003-06-23 Thread Tom Lane
(US style) assume DD before MM, and then reject if out of range, rather than allowing the range to determine which is which. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map

Re: [PATCHES] Patch to be verbose about being unable to read ~/.pgpasss...

2003-06-23 Thread Tom Lane
them up in a window; sending to stderr is likely to mean sending to /dev/null, or at best a logfile that the user will never look at. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] src/bin/psql/input.c

2003-06-25 Thread Tom Lane
(with a note about why). regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [PATCHES] Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

2003-06-25 Thread Tom Lane
for that ASAP.) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] [NOVICE] connectby() minor bug in errormessage

2003-06-25 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Attached is a patch for the issue reported above by Nabil. Please apply. Applied (with correct spelling ...) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists

Re: [PATCHES] Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

2003-06-25 Thread Tom Lane
, or is it just a Source Developer Option? It's gone. You might want to crosscheck the docs against the CVS-tip version of guc.c ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Missing array support

2003-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [PATCHES] polymorphic arguments and return type for PL/pgSQL

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
. Then it would be practical to recover the memory associated with an obsoleted cache entry. But we've lived without this so far, so I guess it's not causing many people problems. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have

Re: [PATCHES] Typo in backend/libpq/be-secure.c

2003-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
? Applied. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] fix for plpgsql polymorphism

2003-07-02 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] fix for plpgsql polymorphism

2003-07-03 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: I'm not excited about picking a notation for the long term on the grounds that it takes the least code to implement today. I knew you wouldn't be ;-) I admit I have not got a clearly-better solution in my hip pocket, but $0 is just

[PATCHES] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection

2003-07-04 Thread Tom Lane
be the set of tested values? I have it as buffers: first to work of 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 50 connections: first to work of 100 50 40 30 20 10 but we could certainly argue for different rules. regards, tom lane *** src/backend/port/sysv_shmem.c.orig

Re: [PATCHES] Autoconf test for incompatible version of flex

2003-07-05 Thread Tom Lane
it. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] Another POC initdb patch

2003-07-06 Thread Tom Lane
to cope with this. I disagree with the concept of expecting someone to supply useful values at install time anyway, since a newbie is the *least* likely to have any idea what to say at that time. Heck, the experts can hardly agree on what to use ... regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection

2003-07-06 Thread Tom Lane
this unless you want to make it interactive, which would certainly make the RPM guys really unhappy. I'd rather see such considerations pushed off to a separate tool, some kind of configuration wizard perhaps. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing

2003-07-20 Thread Tom Lane
Kenji Sugita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name listing. Seems like it'd be a good idea to eliminate views and composite types as well. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [PATCHES] PATCH: Memory leaks on start-up

2003-07-22 Thread Tom Lane
that it was originally told to unlink, regardless of what happens to those globals. If you are intent on spending code to free stuff just before the postmaster exits, a better fix would be for UnlinkLockFile to free its string argument after using it. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] PATCH: Memory leaks on start-up

2003-07-22 Thread Tom Lane
the change as a matter of future-proofing that routine against such use. But on the argument of preventing resource leakage today, this is just a waste of code space. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9

Re: [PATCHES] UPDATED Patch for adding DATACUBE operator

2003-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
, and I'm not having any luck finding that message in the archives right now. Sumit, did you keep a copy? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http

Re: [PATCHES] Datetime patch

2003-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
there are no other paths for parsing a date spec in the main date/time code? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] UPDATED Patch for adding DATACUBE operator

2003-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
Kris Jurka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote: I'm not having any luck finding that message in the archives right now. Sumit, did you keep a copy? http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8selm=28882.1057162309%40sss.pgh.pa.us Thanks, but that actually

Re: [PATCHES] Datetime patch

2003-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
we can get away with deciding that common date formats aren't common. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing

2003-07-27 Thread Tom Lane
, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] ruleutils with pretty-print option

2003-07-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom, how do I pass PG_FUNCTION_ARGS to another function, while adding a new parameter? I wouldn't. Do the PG_GETARGS in the wrapper, and have the called function take a normal C parameter list. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

2003-07-28 Thread Tom Lane
and application. The comment wouldn't have prevented the error, because patch(1) can't read comments. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

2003-07-28 Thread Tom Lane
adding one. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] array expression NULL fix [was: [HACKERS] odd behavior/possible bug]

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

[PATCHES] Any unapplied patches out there?

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
tip or a nightly snapshot tarball should be pretty-durn-close-to-the-beta. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] updateable cursors

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
. I don't understand what the diffs in postgres.c are supposed to accomplish, but I can just about promise that they are misplaced too, since they won't affect queries executed via functions or SPI. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [PATCHES] Check for failed memory allocations in libpq

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
moves the core dump somewhere else, unless you find reasonable fallbacks for *all* its callers (including applications you don't have the source code for, but in any case including every one of the calls in libpq). regards, tom lane ---(end

Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] ruleutils with pretty-print option]

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
+ ((-1.0::float8) + 1.0e-20::float8); ?column? -- 0 (1 row) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [PATCHES] updateable cursors

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This has been saved for the 7.5 release: http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2 Saved for? It's not gonna be acceptable in its current form for 7.5, either. regards, tom lane ---(end

Re: [PATCHES] Autoconf test for incompatible version of flex

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
[ followup to old message ] Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch adds an autoconf test to check for the new incompatible version of flex. Peter E. claims that CVS tip does work with flex 2.5.31 --- so we shouldn't need this patch anymore. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] Check for failed memory allocations in libpq

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
; it will usually behave reasonably when it runs out of memory for a query result. If you'd like to pursue the matter, please pull down CVS tip and see what you can do with it. The patch as given would not be much use to us anyway because of the changes since 7.3... regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] 7.4 COPY BINARY Format Change

2003-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
, and for integers on bigendian machines, but not for much else.) We are not going back to the pre-7.4 format. Sorry. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] IS OF

2003-08-08 Thread Tom Lane
tuple should be said to be IS OF the tuple type of its parent). And what about domains --- should we say a domain type IS OF its base type? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] logging enhancements, minor code cleanup

2003-08-11 Thread Tom Lane
assumption; the question was just about whether your code acts sanely if the assumption isn't true. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] array concat, et al patch

2003-08-19 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here's a patch for the documentation updates. Please apply. Applied with one small change --- I thought the last example failed to make the point that the elements of an ARRAY[] construct could be dissimilar. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] to_timestamp not stable if date string shorter than

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
of the changes didn't apply cleanly, and seemed unrelated anyway. This fixes the immediate complaint, but if there's some reason to apply the rest to 7.3.*, would you submit an additional patch against that branch? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] to_timestamp not stable if date string shorter than

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Karel Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hmm.. but the patch fix another small bug which I found today. Okay. Please send a patch against 7.3 tip and I'll throw it in. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2

Re: [PATCHES] 7.3: [BUGS] to_timestamp not stable if date string shorter than

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Karel Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hmm.. but the patch fix another small bug which I found today. Okay. Please send a patch against 7.3 tip and I'll throw it in. The patch for REL7_3_4 is attached. Applied, thanks. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] PgSQL74b2: initdb fails (max_connections)

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Janko Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On FreeBSD 5.1 using PgSQL 7.4b2 initdb failed with: Yeah, it's broken on any system with shmmax too small for the defaults :-(. My fault. This patch solves the problem: It's fixed in a different way in CVS tip. regards, tom

Re: [PATCHES] Warning for missing createlang

2003-09-04 Thread Tom Lane
misspellings of language names. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] minor documentation improvements

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
in the main description in runtime.sgml, which are all upper case. That is a bit inconsistent, but I think it's OK, because here they sort of serve as section titles.) Okay, that seems reasonable. Ignore my prior message --- I hadn't come across this one yet. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] IPV4 addresses on IPV6 machines in pg_hba.conf

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Would you like me to conditionally add the IPv6 line to pg_hba.conf from initdb now? I was going to tackle that tomorrow, but if you wanna do it, go for it. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [PATCHES] mcxt.c

2003-09-07 Thread Tom Lane
to do this, what is it? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Tom Lane
fixed that yesterday. The s_addr name collision is unfortunate, but easily worked around; fix committed as suggested by Larry. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives

Re: [PATCHES] Minor lmgr code cleanup

2003-09-07 Thread Tom Lane
? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] ISO 8601 Time Intervals of the format with time-unit deignators

2003-09-07 Thread Tom Lane
months''P1Y6M' '3 hours 25 minutes 42 seconds' 'PT3H25M42S' Er, don't we support that already? I know I saw code to support something much like that syntax last time I looked into the datetime routines. regards, tom lane ---(end

Re: [PATCHES] ISO 8601 Time Intervals of the format with time-unit deignators

2003-09-08 Thread Tom Lane
to make sense, it's likely a bug rather than anything we want to preserve. In particular, given the knowledge that it doesn't meet the ISO spec, I'd judge that the existing code for the ISO shorthand was a work-in-progress. regards, tom lane ---(end

Re: [PATCHES] ISO 8601 'Time Intervals' of the 'format with time-unit deignators'

2003-09-08 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] tsearch pfree error

2003-09-13 Thread Tom Lane
assumed Oleg and Teodor would take care of it. But they haven't yet, so I applied what I could. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] NLS changes

2003-09-14 Thread Tom Lane
probably have a better feel for this than I do, but I just wanted to point out that there was *some* thought behind doing it this way. I'm fine with changing it if other translators agree it's better. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [PATCHES] NLS changes

2003-09-14 Thread Tom Lane
, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] New array functions

2003-09-14 Thread Tom Lane
stuff seemed completely obsolete, but intagg isn't. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] backend crashing despite tsearch2 patch

2003-09-17 Thread Tom Lane
the above is unhelpful by any measure. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] contrib mode - pgenv

2003-09-21 Thread Tom Lane
types. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through

Re: [PATCHES] Align large shared memory allocations

2003-09-21 Thread Tom Lane
Manfred Spraul [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: This patch is missing a demonstration that it's actually worth anything. What kind of performance gain do you get? 7.4cvs on a 1.13 GHz Intel Celeron mobile, 384 MB RAM, Severn RedHat Linux 2.4 beta, postmaster -N 30 -B 64, data

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-09-22 Thread Tom Lane
because log_duration is set, we don't need to print it again if the duration of the query exceeded log_min_duration_statement), but I haven't changed it. I think there should be just one duration: nnn log entry, printed if either condition holds. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] bug in vacuumlo?

2003-09-23 Thread Tom Lane
. Sigh. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] bug in vacuumlo?

2003-09-23 Thread Tom Lane
. But vacuumlo shouldn't depend on it.) I've applied a patch. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so

Re: [PATCHES] correct NUL vs. NULL usage

2003-09-24 Thread Tom Lane
other names for the null character. In short, I think most of this patch is just pedantry. Could you trim it down to just the places where there's actually risk of confusion? (I do agree that upper case NULL is not appropriate as a name for the character.) regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] tablefunc functions in postgresql

2003-10-01 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump --table=* dumps nothing?

2003-10-02 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-04 Thread Tom Lane
than moving information around depending on which combination of switches happens to have caused the log entries to be generated. Am willing to fix the code to make this happen. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-04 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: I would prefer to see the log entries look like LOG: query: select * from pg_class; LOG: duration: nn.nnn msec The problem with two lines is that another log message could get between them. That was true already with log_statement

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
lines together, then we have got lots bigger problems to fix than log_duration. I'm not convinced it's an appropriate goal at all, though. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
, which would tip you off?) I think this is a red herring. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane writes: BTW, EXPLAIN ANALYZE puts out Total runtime: 406.53 msec Do you want to make an exception to the string freeze to change this to ms? I just realized, all the things that are sent as a query result instead of an error or notice

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also I'd love to see the log_query being settable per database... AFAIK you can do that now. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
position considerably. It needs a little thought as to whether this would induce any confusion, and whether we really care if so. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another example: LOG: duration: 4.228 ms; select *\nfrom pg_language; Minor quibble: would it read better as LOG: duration n.nnn ms: query or LOG: duration n.nnn ms for query regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
in making the log easy to process. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-06 Thread Tom Lane
for one line per part, viz ERROR: blah blah blah DETAIL: blah blah\nblah blah HINT: blah blah\nblah blah\nblah blah but perhaps someone would like to argue for somehow collapsing all this to one line? If so, how exactly? regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-06 Thread Tom Lane
, we add a tab after any newline, That's a thought... seems less invasive than the backslashing. Not sure how well it'll work for syslog output though. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all

Re: [PATCHES] fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

2003-10-06 Thread Tom Lane
HINT: something else No, one would hope no tab before DETAIL/HINT/etc. The idea is to be able to recognize when the contents of one of these entries spans lines. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4

Re: [PATCHES] fix for strict-alias warnings

2003-10-11 Thread Tom Lane
move. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] fix for strict-alias warnings

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
not worry about code motion around a MemSet call, since that would require the compiler to prove that the memset() path through the macro wouldn't be affected, which I doubt it would think. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [Fwd: [PATCHES] Make psql use all pretty print options]

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
), becomes ! printfPQExpBuffer(buf, _(\%s\ %s), but ISTM the latter string doesn't really need any translation and so it wouldn't be much of a problem. Comments? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [PATCHES] fix for strict-alias warnings

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [PATCHES] fix for strict-alias warnings

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane writes: Given that gcc is smart enough not to move any code across the memset() call, Is it? It had better be. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8

Re: [PATCHES] fix for strict-alias warnings

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
possibly optimize away the alignment test ...) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] fix for strict-alias warnings

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Manfred Spraul [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Is gcc 3.3 smart enough to optimize away the pointer alignment test in the full macro? 3.2 optimizes away the pointer alignment test, but then doesn't pipeline the x*x calculation. Hm, confirmed here. So indeed it seems that Bruce

Re: [PATCHES] psql tab completion bug and possible fix

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] fix for strict-alias warnings

2003-10-15 Thread Tom Lane
to 2.7.something, which is pretty much ancient history now --- and if anyone needs to make it work with such an old gcc, all they need do is specify CFLAGS to configure instead of letting it default. Will commit this change unless I hear objections soon. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] fix for strict-alias warnings

2003-10-15 Thread Tom Lane
would fix that, since it sure looks like an optimization bug, but evidently not. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] random_fract and aix compiler bug

2003-10-17 Thread Tom Lane
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Would we be happy with the following, which would work ? } while (z = 0 || z == MAX_RANDOM_VALUE); I suppose this doesn't? } while (z = 0 || z = MAX_RANDOM_VALUE); regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] fix memory leak in libpq

2003-10-17 Thread Tom Lane
. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump problems against 7.0

2003-10-20 Thread Tom Lane
in *everything* being considered a system table? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump problems against 7.0

2003-10-20 Thread Tom Lane
.), so how about the attached patch? Seems reasonable, but the patch ought to fix the comment just above, preferably with the above observation that this is correct by examination of the now-frozen 7.0 initdb code ... regards, tom lane ---(end

Re: [PATCHES] AIX port current

2003-10-21 Thread Tom Lane
so actually there has never been an assumption that c.h would include fcntl.h generally. Okay, objection withdrawn. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] obj_description problems?

2003-10-21 Thread Tom Lane
qualified functions? There might possibly be some issues in contrib stuff, but there are no other SQL-language functions defined in the main system (except information_schema, which we already checked). regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] obj_description problems?

2003-10-21 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, I will test them all today and get back to you. I checked them all before applying, but please do cross-check. We're close enough to release that double- and triple-checking patches is called for. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] make check improvement for cygwin

2003-10-27 Thread Tom Lane
certain he realizes that he's got a very low number-of-connections resource limit. Sweeping such problems under the rug is exactly what make check should not do. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner

Re: [PATCHES] Ant version detection

2003-10-28 Thread Tom Lane
Johann Uhrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Johann Uhrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... Therefore, only lines beginning with Apache Ant version should be considered. Do *all* versions of Ant identify themselves that way? I'd be inclined to write grep -i ant version instead

Re: [PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-02 Thread Tom Lane
+} +__EOF__ + $CC conftest.c /dev/null 21 + if test $? = 0; then +CFLAGS=-O -Kinline + else +CFLAGS=-O -Kinline,no_host + fi regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak

2003-11-03 Thread Tom Lane
before we recurse. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak

2003-11-03 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 10:04, Tom Lane wrote: You have effectively reverted the code to its previous slow state. Erm, the original version of this code in CVS (from ~7 years ago) is the following: Hm. I coulda sworn that at some point I changed that code

Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak

2003-11-05 Thread Tom Lane
the second List, as later mods to either list could destroy the invariant for the other list. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [PATCHES] (repost) pgtcl: restore 8.0 compatibility for large obj fix

2003-11-05 Thread Tom Lane
the problem for Tcl 8.0.*? Or will the unwanted character set translation happen anyway in that version? I don't see any value in letting the code compile against 8.0.* if the behavior will be wrong ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >