Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just realized that scan.l should also be included, because there are
> four or five strings in there.  But maybe the pot should instead be
> generated on a non-clean tree so those strings are extracted from the .c
> files?  I downloaded the postgres.pot file from
> and those strings are not
> included there.

Does seem like a problem.  plpgsql's .y and .l files need to be
considered also, and I think there are some ereports in guc-file.l.

Peter, which way do you want to fix it?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to