Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just realized that scan.l should also be included, because there are
> four or five strings in there. But maybe the pot should instead be
> generated on a non-clean tree so those strings are extracted from the .c
> files? I downloaded the postgres.pot file from
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ and those strings are not
> included there.
Does seem like a problem. plpgsql's .y and .l files need to be
considered also, and I think there are some ereports in guc-file.l.
Peter, which way do you want to fix it?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
