Hi all,
I have just started with PostgreSQL on Linux and in the past I've done a
good bit of work on Interbase (both on Windows and Linux).
What I want to know here is
What do people here think of Interbase/Firebird?
Has anybody done performance metrics or could they point me to a
compa
Paul Ganainm wrote:
Does Interbase/Firebird have (as far as people here are concerned) any
show-stoppers in terms of functionality which they do have on
PostgreSQL? Or, indeed, the other way round?
Personally I think native windows port is plus that interbase/firebird has over
postgresql. It als
About a year ago I programmed a php/firebird application, and I've never had a problem with firebird. It's a small database (a few megabytes), but it just works day after day.
I've seen firebird has updatable views, they seem to work very well.
I have the feeling that It's not as flexible as
The \timing psql command gives different time for the same query executed
repeatedly.
So, how can we know the exact response time for any query?
Thanks and Regards,
Radha
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 09:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> How do we measure the response time in postgresql?
>
> In additio
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The \timing psql command gives different time for the same query executed
> repeatedly.
That's probably because executing the query repeatedly results in
different execution times, as one would expect. \timing returns the
"exact" query response time, nevertheless.
-N
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:35:22AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The \timing psql command gives different time for the same query executed
> repeatedly.
Why do you believe that the same query will always take the same time
to execute?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan 204-41
