Grega,
> Well, as I said, that's why I was asking - I'm willing to give it a go
> if nobody can prove me wrong. :)
Why not? If you have time?
> I thought you knew - OCFS, OCFS-Tools and OCFSv2 have not only been open-
> source for quite a while now - they're released under the GPL.
Keen! Wo
...and on Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:09:16AM -0700, Josh Berkus used the keyboard:
>
> Does it work, though? Without Oracle admin tools?
Hello, Josh. :)
Well, as I said, that's why I was asking - I'm willing to give it a go
if nobody can prove me wrong. :)
> > Now, if both goals can be achieved
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:09:16AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> If your intention in this test is to show the superiority of raw devices, let
> me give you a reality check: barring some major corporate backing getting
> involved, we can't possibly implement our own PG-FS for database support. We
Grega,
> Furthermore, this filesystem would be a blazing one stop solution for
> all replication issues PostgreSQL currently suffers from, as its main
> design goal was to present "a consistent file system image across the
> servers in a cluster".
Does it work, though? Without Oracle admin tool
...and on Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:26:02AM -0400, Tom Lane used the keyboard:
>
> After that, we get to implement our own filesystem-equivalent management
> of disk space allocation, disk I/O scheduling, etc. Are we really
> smarter than all those kernel hackers doing this for a living? I doubt i
