Re: [Pgui-devel] picogui 0.44 won't compile?

2003-02-02 Thread Micah Dowty
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 08:36:27PM +0100, Martin Doering wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:40:45 -0700 > Micah Dowty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any idea what I am doing wrong? > > > > You need to have GNU Libtool installed > > Will we ever have this dependency? Will it possibly go away wit

Re: [Pgui-devel] Re: VNC support

2003-02-02 Thread Micah Dowty
I was planning on porting the current system to SCons, so we'd have a very flexible system written in 100% python. The main factor in choosing this was picogui's high demand for compile-time configuration. I want to build a system that can manage all aspects of configuring a picogui system, from co

Re: [Pgui-devel] Re: VNC support

2003-02-02 Thread Micah Dowty
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 08:22:13PM +0100, Martin Doering wrote: > On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:04:55 -0700 > Micah Dowty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > pgserver should be pretty easy to port to win32, but I don't even have > > a working windows machine and nobody else has done it :) > > Well, not that

Re: [Pgui-devel] Re: VNC support

2003-02-02 Thread Simon Cusack
I too had a look and reached the same conclusion, then I noticed that a refactoring was mentioned on the website and that this also included talk of using a different build tool. I thought I might wait until then to have another look at it. How big a job would it be to port the current build j

Re: [Pgui-devel] picogui 0.44 won't compile?

2003-02-02 Thread Martin Doering
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:40:45 -0700 Micah Dowty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any idea what I am doing wrong? > > You need to have GNU Libtool installed Will we ever have this dependency? Will it possibly go away with the changes to a more not Unix centric build system you told about? Things li

Re: [Pgui-devel] Re: VNC support

2003-02-02 Thread Martin Doering
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:04:55 -0700 Micah Dowty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > pgserver should be pretty easy to port to win32, but I don't even have > a working windows machine and nobody else has done it :) Well, not that I had the time ( ;-) ), but what did stay me away from it is, that there are

Re: [Pgui-devel] VNC demo

2003-02-02 Thread Micah Dowty
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 07:51:29PM +0100, Martin Doering wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 03:59:28 -0700 > Micah Dowty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The VNC server still needs some debugging and tweaking. It looks like > > the'tight' encoding has a bug that will randomly crash the VNC client. > > I

Re: [Pgui-devel] Re: VNC support

2003-02-02 Thread Micah Dowty
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 07:48:32PM +0100, Martin Doering wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:32:34 -0500 > "Jeff Kowalczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Micah Dowty" wrote > > > As a little bonus before the 0.44 release, I've added a VNC server > > > video driver to pgserver. > > > > This is a v

Re: [Pgui-devel] Video and animation inside PicoGUI

2003-02-02 Thread Micah Dowty
SDL would be good for the role of PicoGUI Media Layer Of Choice (tm) except for a few big reasons: - It doesn't handle color depths lower than 8bpp - It only supports true color or palletized video modes (more unusual modes like text mode or a tiled mode would be impossible to work with,

Re: [Pgui-devel] VNC demo

2003-02-02 Thread Martin Doering
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 03:59:28 -0700 Micah Dowty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The VNC server still needs some debugging and tweaking. It looks like > the'tight' encoding has a bug that will randomly crash the VNC client. > It was having problems with getting very slow when more than a few > clients

Re: [Pgui-devel] Re: VNC support

2003-02-02 Thread Martin Doering
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:32:34 -0500 "Jeff Kowalczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Micah Dowty" wrote > > As a little bonus before the 0.44 release, I've added a VNC server > > video driver to pgserver. > > This is a very cool idea. Yes, and not only that. This means, that in my office I would j

Re: [Pgui-devel] Video and animation inside PicoGUI

2003-02-02 Thread Martin Doering
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 09:55:14 -0700 Micah Dowty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - A very thin OS abstraction layer for the SHM segment A simple direct media layer? Sounds like that. ;-) Why not use it generally? -- Martin --- This SF.NET email

Re: [Pgui-devel] Desktop-style window management

2003-02-02 Thread Martin Doering
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 11:15:54 +0100 Peter Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > >Peter, please see this as a "power" and not as a shortcoming. Also see, > >how happy many people still are with character mode applications. This > >power does not come from the restriction to characters,