30170
-
10654 Add the --save option to the eval command line handler
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10654
10698 add back Block printing
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10698
(When Opal is Active)
Diff information:
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=linux/196/
1 regressions found.
ToolsTest.Debugger.DebuggerTest.testBasic
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=mac/196/
1 regressions found.
ToolsTest.Debugger.DebuggerTest.testBasic
in 30 I get an error asShortCut… DNU.
Stef
On May 26, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Denis Kudriashov dionisi...@gmail.com wrote:
m := TxTextMorph new.
m editDecorator: TxSingleLineEditDecorator smartNumbers.
m textSpec: (TxDecimalTextSpec maxDecimalDigits: 3).
m newTextContents:
yes we want more of them.
I want to free my mind about stupid low level details.
Stef
Excellent. I love highly specific rules :). They bring so much more value
than the other ones.
Cheers,
Doru
On May 26, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
10621 Create a
I am currently experimenting with Pharo on Amazon EC2.
I'd like to keep the CPU usage low for when Pharo hasn't anything special
to do.
At the moment, I see that Pharo uses 2-3% of the CPU when just blinking the
caret.
Is there a way to get that lower? Even if it means tweaking the VM.
The OS
Le 25/05/2013 13:59, Benjamin a écrit :
I am pretty sure to only use weak registration (why aren't all the
registration weak btw ??)
It may be a problem somewhere else :(
I hit that problem a while ago. I couldn't find where it was holding the
instances, even with the help of the strong
I was looking at the output of top for while and Pharo was trusting the
top spot indeed.
Well, I'll look at all that this evening and give back the impressions.
I want to run several instances of Pharo on the box and it will for sure
add up. Say, 20 x 2% gives an awful lot.
Phil
On Mon, May
DONE: installed libssl1.0.0:i386 on pharo-contribution-linux64-2.ci.inria.fr
On 2013-05-27, at 11:22, Pavel Krivanek pavel.kriva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
our slaves on Jenkins-Contribution server do not have 32bit libSSL
installed so If I try to run all jobs there, I got this error:
thanks
-- Pavel
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Camillo Bruni camillobr...@gmail.comwrote:
DONE: installed libssl1.0.0:i386 on
pharo-contribution-linux64-2.ci.inria.fr
On 2013-05-27, at 11:22, Pavel Krivanek pavel.kriva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
our slaves on Jenkins-Contribution
2013/5/27 stephane ducasse stephane.duca...@free.fr
we found the problem. It is not spec but the EyeInspector polling update.
So we should find a solution.
Probably it should register WindowClosed and kill the process.
Actually the inspector is already registered on WindowClosed event.
This
Hourra it works !
Thank you Nicolas Damien
Now I want to be able to remove projects ;-)
Regards
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Nicolas Petton
petton.nico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I've just updated SmalltalkHub with new features and bug fixes, especially:
- Packages can now be removed
On 27 May 2013 16:21, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 May 2013 12:28, Henrik Johansen henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no wrote:
On May 27, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On May 25, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
why there is no variant to on:send:to:
30171
-
10764 EyeInspector never terminate refresh process leading to no garbage
collection
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10764
10767 Object#assert:description: should take a block for the description
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10767
10698 add
On May 27, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote:
On 27 May 2013, at 16:45, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
10698 add back Block printing
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10698
(Really only if Opal is Active)
Aah, a good reason to active
20605
-
10653 Some Jenkins images show a stdout is closed error
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10653
Diff information:
http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/System-CommandLine-MarcusDenker.83.diff
See
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/./Run=run%201,VM=vm,label=linux/244/
See
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/./Run=run%201,VM=vm,label=win/244/
Hi guys
why there is no variant to on:send:to:
SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo to: self.
that pass also the announcement?
Just because it is better to use on:do;?
Stef
Huh?
It should work do do
SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo:
Igor
can you add a bug entry and propose a fix?
So that we do not forget.
Stef
Hi guys
why there is no variant to on:send:to:
SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo to: self.
that pass also the announcement?
Just because it is better to use on:do;?
Stef
On 27 May 2013 19:05, stephane ducasse stephane.duca...@free.fr wrote:
Igor
can you add a bug entry and propose a fix?
So that we do not forget.
yes.
Stef
Hi guys
why there is no variant to on:send:to:
SystemAnnouncer uniqueInstance on: AddedLog send: #foo to: self.
that pass
Hi,
I found the issue: the url from the Gofer script was wrong :).
Here is the correct one:
Gofer it
url: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/sig/TxText/main';
package: 'ConfigurationOfTxText';
load.
((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfTxText) project version: '1.0') load:
22 matches
Mail list logo
