Re: [Pharo-dev] Call for design for a literal programming doc similar to PythonDocTest

Hi, > On Sep 16, 2016, at 8:37 PM, stepharo wrote: > > + 1 > > Changing the language metamodel for simple validated comments is a huge > effort for nothing. > Clement is good at VM level but not at other level :) I think there is a misunderstanding :). I do not see any

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [ANN] Pillar 4.0.0

Hi, Great. I also started to use it, and I would be interested in working also on creating a webpage out of the box. It is also unclear to me how to deal with pillar.conf (I did not look at the code yet.). Should I rely on a book.pillar root class that embeds the chapter files? Or is there a

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [ANN] Pillar 4.0.0

I think the book.pillar root file is the way. On 17 September 2016 at 08:21, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Great. I also started to use it, and I would be interested in working also > on creating a webpage out of the box. > > It is also unclear to me how to deal with

Re: [Pharo-dev] Call for design for a literal programming doc similar to PythonDocTest

Le 16/9/16 à 21:58, Damien Pollet a écrit : On 16 September 2016 at 20:42, stepharo > wrote: Daemons of over-engineering are tempting us because this is cooler to to design something complex. Dreaming of crazy features is a good thing.

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [ANN] Pillar 4.0.0

Le 17/9/16 à 08:21, Tudor Girba a écrit : Hi, Great. I also started to use it, and I would be interested in working also on creating a webpage out of the box. It is also unclear to me how to deal with pillar.conf (I did not look at the code yet.). Should I rely on a book.pillar root class