Re: [Pharo-users] Modal widget

2014-04-23 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
look at the implementation of #callInWorld for Magritte-Morph. I always liked that solution :) Esteban On 23 Apr 2014, at 10:46, Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In a morph hierarchy I would like one morph child to be modal (i.e. all other morphs are locked and

Re: [Pharo-users] Modal widget

2014-04-23 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
which now I remember I always complemented it “web-like”: I added a transparent sticky morph behind, so all the morphs become unaccessible… I do not remember why I needed it, thought. Esteban On 23 Apr 2014, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote: look at the implementation

Re: [Pharo-users] Error when trying to initiate Pharo in Ubuntu 64 bits

2014-04-23 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Whoever compiled it deserves commendation. Nevertheless, in my opinion it´s an issue to keep in mind for the future; distributions are likely to upgrade their libc at different points in time, and a good lowest common denominator should be chosen with care, otherwise it´s not really common at

Re: [Pharo-users] Athens and ellipse drawing

2014-04-23 Thread Henrik Johansen
On 22 Apr 2014, at 2:23 , Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote: as for why there's 4 arc segments instead of one, its because of bad approximation, when drawing more that 90 degree arcs. also, in athens, arc segment is defined with following inputs: - end point of previous segment

Re: [Pharo-users] Error when trying to initiate Pharo in Ubuntu 64 bits

2014-04-23 Thread Norbert Hartl
Am 23.04.2014 um 11:36 schrieb Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl: Whoever compiled it deserves commendation. Nevertheless, in my opinion it´s an issue to keep in mind for the future; distributions are likely to upgrade their libc at different points in time, and a good lowest common

Re: [Pharo-users] Versionner screencast

2014-04-23 Thread Ben Coman
Christophe Demarey wrote: Hello, I made a small screencast on Versionner to explain how to use it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5Dbmmln8tA Regards, Christophe. Very nice. Seeing how to use it definitely helps me consider using it. cheers -ben

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Gravatar for Pharo Smalltalk

2014-04-23 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
There is already code for that in the image: (PharoUser new retrieveGravatarFromMail: 's...@stfx.eu') openInWindow. PharoUser is an odd class (this code should be on the class side). Maybe both approaches can be combined ? On 23 Apr 2014, at 13:44, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote: Hi,

Re: [Pharo-users] Athens and ellipse drawing

2014-04-23 Thread Igor Stasenko
On 23 April 2014 13:17, Henrik Johansen henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.nowrote: On 22 Apr 2014, at 2:23 , Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote: as for why there's 4 arc segments instead of one, its because of bad approximation, when drawing more that 90 degree arcs. also, in athens, arc

Re: [Pharo-users] Athens and ellipse drawing

2014-04-23 Thread Henrik Johansen
On 23 Apr 2014, at 2:31 , Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 April 2014 13:17, Henrik Johansen henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no wrote: On 22 Apr 2014, at 2:23 , Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote: as for why there's 4 arc segments instead of one, its because of bad

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

2014-04-23 Thread Christophe Demarey
Hi, Le 17 avr. 2014 à 19:22, Attila Magyar a écrit : Hi Christophe, Sorry for my late response. You can use the following syntax to signal an error in response to an incoming message: protocol describe once: mock recv: #msg; signals: Error. I did not notice this one. Thanks! I

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

2014-04-23 Thread Attila Magyar
Hi Christophe, I'm not sure I fully understand, are you referring to partial mocking? Where you have a real object but with some mocked methods? If this is the case, then no, this is not supported. Some people consider this as a test smell, and I agree with them. Maybe the object under test is

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

2014-04-23 Thread Christophe Demarey
Le 23 avr. 2014 à 15:37, Attila Magyar a écrit : Hi Christophe, I'm not sure I fully understand, are you referring to partial mocking? Where you have a real object but with some mocked methods? If this is the case, then no, this is not supported. Some people consider this as a test smell,

[Pharo-users] [OT] TDD is dead. Long live testing. (DHH)

2014-04-23 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
More or less what I think: testing is necessary and should be pragmatic fun, not a dogma http://david.heinemeierhansson.com/2014/tdd-is-dead-long-live-testing.html

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] TDD is dead. Long live testing. (DHH)

2014-04-23 Thread Dennis Schetinin
TDD is not about testing, it's about development. -- Best regards, Dennis Schetinin 2014-04-23 19:35 GMT+04:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu: More or less what I think: testing is necessary and should be pragmatic fun, not a dogma

Re: [Pharo-users] We need *you* for the upcoming Pharo's website

2014-04-23 Thread kilon alios
Well I tried, several times , but I am not happy with the end result. In any case I am finished with this and since I promised to upload it here it is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ol5ivaEATLQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ol5ivaEATLQfeature=youtu.be Sorry I cannot deliver something of

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

2014-04-23 Thread Attila Magyar
Christophe Demarey wrote ... but sometimes, even in a well-designed class, you may need to test a very small part of this class, and in this case, you need a real object with some mocked methods. I assume that there is a method need to be tested, but it calls towards an other either public or