On 22 May 2018 at 23:23, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
> Hi - when trying out the new Iceberg with a bunch of developers and
> explaining the challenges of integrating git and files into a smalltalk
> realm of the image - there was a lot of interest in how this works.
>
> When you clone
Esteban A. Maringolo wrote
> there is no way to "save" the package other than committing its changes to
> the repo.
In the past, I sorely missed a feature like this. When Iceberg (or I!) was
confused about the state of the local repo/changes/whatever, I wished I had
a way to write to disk and
Tim Mackinnon wrote
> Although possibly calling it “Commit…” might make it more obvious that you
> have a chance to review changes and change your mind
+1. This minor change would IMHO make things much more obvious, especially
to people unfamiliar with git…
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from:
Actually I missed that one - thanks. Would have been a useful one to show
everyone when we went through the commit process - it’s very good.
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
> On 22 May 2018, at 17:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
> Partial answer, but you saw this,
The community has invested a lot in a new way of working - I’ve seen the pain,
but I think it’s both inspiring , a difficult journey but ultimately well worth
it.
We need to finish this first leg though, but I’m still very proud to be a
smalltalker ...
Sent from my iPhone
> On 22 May 2018,
I agree with you that it is weird, but as I understand it it is
because the process of "Saving" a package and "Committing" it is
merged into a single action, so there is no way to "save" the package
other than committing its changes to the repo.
This has the drawback you mentioned, but I guess
Partial answer, but you saw this, right ?
https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg/wiki/Iceberg-glossary
> On 22 May 2018, at 17:23, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
>
> Hi - when trying out the new Iceberg with a bunch of developers and
> explaining the challenges of integrating git and
Hi - when trying out the new Iceberg with a bunch of developers and explaining
the challenges of integrating git and files into a smalltalk realm of the image
- there was a lot of interest in how this works.
When you clone - you obviously see a series of files (in Tonel - nice) that are
then
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the detailed/constructive feedback. I am sure it will be helpful.
Sven
> On 22 May 2018, at 17:15, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
>
> Hi - last night we managed to explore the new contribution process as well as
> the new iceberg ui at the U.K. Smalltalk meetup
Hi - last night we managed to explore the new contribution process as well as
the new iceberg ui at the U.K. Smalltalk meetup last night.
Not many had seen it before so it was a good test run.
As an initial comment - we need to invest a small amount of time to get the
right docs in places you
> On 17 May 2018, at 15:44, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Today, 17h europe time.
>
> Pharo TechTalk: Pillar
> https://association.pharo.org/event-2797069
>
> Sorry for the late announcement (we did not know if we could make it today)
>
The recording is
HilaireFernandes wrote
> Thanks Sven for the indications.
>
> Of course I already looked at this Test, but I got lost. I looked at it
> again, and wrote something like:
>
> | socket data | socket := Socket newUDP. socket setPort: .
> socket waitForConnectionFor: 2; waitForDataFor: 5
why libcairo2-dev and not just libcairo2?
cheers,
Esteban
> On 21 May 2018, at 17:25, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
>
> Thank you for that. The instructions there are incomplete.
> It is necessary to add
> sudo apt-get install libcairo2-dev:i386
> to the script.
>
> On 21 May 2018
13 matches
Mail list logo