Re: [PHP-DB] Pass database id through href

Gavin Amm wrote: EXAMPLE: (I know you can't use "value" with the "a" tag, but bear with me for illustration purposes in this pseudo-code) Auditing Home Finance Home Planning Home Tax Home When the admin clicks on one of the "parent" hyperlinks, the form is submitted with (in this example) (

[PHP-DB] Pass database id through href

Hi. I want to update mysql database with parent value of page. I have several fields in my form. I have a generated map of web site pages as hyperlinks at end of form. (generated recursively) I want to be able to click on hyperlink & have it pass the "parent" value to the next PHP script. The poi

Re: [PHP-DB] DB and mssql

Hi Matt Before sending the result set, the mssql extension stores the entire result set into memory. However, PHP limits the amount of memory that can be allocated by a script to 8MB. So, the query will fail if the result set is larger than 8MB. You can change this value in php.ini with the mem

[PHP-DB] Re: Dynamic Form?

Hello, On 04/13/2004 05:25 PM, Aaron Wolski wrote: I've been given the task of developing a dynamic form for a client. When I say dynamic, I mean dynamic in that the client can use an administrative interface (back-end) to create the various form fields (and types) that get displayed on the front

[PHP-DB] Re: Dynamic Form?

Aaron Wolski wrote: Hi All, I've been given the task of developing a dynamic form for a client. When I say dynamic, I mean dynamic in that the client can use an administrative interface (back-end) to create the various form fields (and types) that get displayed on the front-end. Before I start b

[PHP-DB] Dynamic Form?

Hi All, I've been given the task of developing a dynamic form for a client. When I say dynamic, I mean dynamic in that the client can use an administrative interface (back-end) to create the various form fields (and types) that get displayed on the front-end. Before I start brainstorming the DB

[PHP-DB] DB and mssql

I am using PEAR::DB on linux, php 4.3.2, with freetds to access a sql server database. I am trying to get more information on the problem, but everyonece in a while, it seems random, php will stop executing when I use the query method, php stops executing. I dont get an error, php just stops runn

RE: Re[2]: [PHP-DB] Curious if include_once will work better than include

After a 2-second search of the PHP manual... "require() and include() are identical in every way except how they handle failure. include() produces a Warning while require() results in a Fatal Error. In other words, don't hesitate to use require() if you want a missing file to halt processing of t

Re[2]: [PHP-DB] Curious if include_once will work better than include

Hi! Sorry for my offtopic, but by the way, what's the difference between include/include_once and require/require_once? Tuesday, April 13, 2004, 10:29:14 PM, Eric wrote: >> Curious about "include_once" versus "include". >> >> All my connection stuff is in "conn.php3". >> >> I am planning on incl

Re: [PHP-DB] Curious if include_once will work better than include

> Curious about "include_once" versus "include". > > All my connection stuff is in "conn.php3". > > I am planning on including it at the top of the page like this: > include_once "conn.php3"; > > Now will that speed things up compared to just using a plain "include". I > call $connectionSDWIS(which

Re: [PHP-DB] Curious if include_once will work better than include

Hi! Include_once can't include one file several times. I think if you use include_once PHP see if that file already were included, and don't include it one more time... Maybe difference is time to check this... I don't trust this fact: KR> Now will that speed things up compared to just using a pla

Re: [PHP-DB] Curious if include_once will work better than include

My understanding is include_once() called several times in the same page or include files will only be included once. > Curious about "include_once" versus "include". > > All my connection stuff is in "conn.php3". > > I am planning on including it at the top of the page like this: > include_once "

[PHP-DB] Curious if include_once will work better than include

Curious about "include_once" versus "include". All my connection stuff is in "conn.php3". I am planning on including it at the top of the page like this: include_once "conn.php3"; Now will that speed things up compared to just using a plain "include". I call $connectionSDWIS(which is in the

[PHP-DB] seg fault in 4.3.5 and 4.3.2

I am trying to recompile PHP to include several features that --to my knowledge-- are not normally part of Linux distros. However, when I provide the following configuration, I get a binary that seg-faults in 4.3.5 and 4.3.2: ./configure --with-apxs --with-mysql=/usr --with-gd --with-ttf --with-zl