is there any chance that we can revert this annoying feature?
The translated documentation is always behind and partly lacks
important information from the english version. I want to read
the documentation in english (and I am not the only one). This
is only possible if I change the url after
is there any chance that we can revert this annoying feature?
The translated documentation is always behind and partly lacks
important information from the english version. I want to read
the documentation in english (and I am not the only one). This
is only possible if I change the
I agree, this auto language detection is quite annoying...
I concur, why not add a cookie which remembers the last chosen language?
OK, I am not a php-dev member, so I have not read your mails.
Can someone please summarize the problems or provide me with
links to archived mails explaining
is there any chance that we can revert this annoying feature?
The translated documentation is always behind and partly lacks
important information from the english version. I want to read
the documentation in english (and I am not the only one). This
is only possible if I change the url after
It detects upon the user-prefered language in the browser, hence
I don't have this problem as I prefer english in browser.
But yes - if you prefer your native language in general, this can be
annoying especially since you don't have any control over it (like
with a cookie saving general
What browser denies you from setting this accept-language thing?
You do have control over it, and it is far more general then
having a cookie in the browser. Which is also not that flexible,
as we would probably only store one language code.
Gabor, the problem is that you can't override
It was fixed in that it will link to documention for include()
or require() (depending on the error) instead of main(). So,
it links to different yet more appropriate pages now.
Not sure if/what other errors cause a link to here but I
agree we may as well create a dummy page for main()
That is if I understand correctly a link in an error message. So either
PHP needs to hide that link in error messages, or the function.main
shortcut shuold point to somewhere on the homepage, explaining what is
function.main
speaking of the link feature: can't we deactivate that
On your apache2 compatibility page you state
Apache 2.0 SAPI-support started with PHP 4.2.0. PHP 4.2.3 its known to
work in conjunction with Apache 2.0.39. Don't try to use this version of
PHP with any other version of Apache. We do not recommend to use PHP
4.2.3 along with Apache
what is function.main? it keeps popping up on my requires and links to =
yoru site but nuthin' happens
That is if I understand correctly a link in an error message. So either
PHP needs to hide that link in error messages, or the function.main
shortcut shuold point to somewhere on the homepage,
what is function.main? it keeps popping up on my requires and links to =
yoru site but nuthin' happens
That is if I understand correctly a link in an error message. So either
PHP needs to hide that link in error messages, or the function.main
shortcut shuold point to somewhere on the homepage,
I am actually pondering about removing distrobutions from phpweb, and
moving
it to it's own cvs module, with slightly more heavier control over it.
This
is to be a bit more secure over releases, and also it is usually not
needed
during a checkout of phpweb. (if you're going to checkout phpweb,
hmm. that is an interesting idea... hacking the dolog.pl script to publish
the diffs for large attachements instead of including them inline might
not
be a bad thing (tm).
Now, **no** cvs mails are sent regarding the distributions dir. It is
skipped
because the files are big. But diffs cannot
we could also just do a system(file $_); or whatever to work out what
kind
of file we're adding... and if it's a binary type file, then just don't
diff.
Images and compressed files are not diffed. So if I update Mirrors-htdig.tgz
then nobody can see what I have changed in the instructions
Hi!
Do the files hosted at $subj have any use now, or is there any point
in hosting files from as far as 1997 or 1998?
bindlib_w32.zip and win32build.zip are definitely still needed.
Hm, it's quite interesting to see that packages from two or four
years ago still work on Windows ;)
Hi!
It would be nice to add links to the latest aliases to the snaps.php.net
main page. It seems that the aliases containing latest instead of the
package / compile time are still in effect, so please add the links to
them on the snaps page.
Thanks,
Goba
--
PHP Development Mailing List
1. It's not production ready
Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to the best version yet
marketing
trick the Apache Group is advertising on their front page.
We can mention it to users, in the bug db etc. But officially documenting,
that
Apache 2 is really a beta product, doesn't
As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
documentation
that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
production ready
for Apache 2.
But it's incorrect :). By saying Do not use Apache 2 and PHP in a
production environment you don't blame any of the
The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works
only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.04x only with php4.2y1
or php4.2.y2? It
Hi!
We receive many complaints at [EMAIL PROTECTED] about failures in setting
up PHP with Apache 2. Can somebody please update the documentation with
details on Apache 2 on Linux and Windows, or provide information for the
documentation team to add to the documentation. It would definitely help
What php-dev guys think about this?
Goba
- Original Message -
From: Friedhelm Betz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: [PHP-DOC] iconv-extension
Sources state iconv extensions as experimental. Is this (still) correct?
If so,
IMHO if anyone gets on this job, general errors should
be put somewhere to an appendix, and function specific
errors should go to every function ;) Like what errors
mail() can emit. This is a *huge* work as I can see.
This sounds good, can this process be at
least partialy
Then there is only the last argument not spoken about yet:
Externally developed extensions.
and PECL extensions respectively. For external developed extensions I
suggest
putting them into PECL (at least the documentation, if there are license
issues about the extension's code itself) and for
| Erm - good point we cannot find pecl.function.name automatically by
| docref=NULL. Either pecl must be available by function.name or by
| just using name on php.net. This is also a problem for external
copies
| of the manual.
PECL, PEAR and other functions won't be available as
php_error_docref(function.fopen TSRMLS_CC, E_WARNING, Spongebob Square
Pants lives in a pineapple under the sea);
To me that should be the recommended method, as it will allow the php.ini
values for language to override everything nicely, and everyone can see
the PHP manual in their desired
Can someone please help out Wez? ;)
I don't really know what streams are about [it's not documented ;)],
so if it's a new extension, Wez can start with copy-pasting one
extensions documentation (see phpdoc/en/reference/ANY_EXTENSION_NAME).
The XML files are quite self descriptive, so the tags
Forwarding this to php-dev. Those guys can answer your
question...
Goba [one [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:28 PM
Subject: 4.2.1 download missing Apache2 experimental folder
Referring to...
It has been mentioned before -- what is there left to do to PHP? -- and
I
believe that we could just fix up all the bugs left, and then work on
writing add-ons in pecl or pear. Really, lets stop turning this language
into bloat-ware with all the latest plugins and gadgets (that make other
Hi!
Please post a notice to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you are ready with
the full Apache 2 compatibilty, and it will be available in some
release of PHP. A new news item in this case would be nice, to
announce a milestone in the php-apache front, especially regarding
*security*.
Thanks,
Goba
--
Please post a notice to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you are ready with
the full Apache 2 compatibilty, and it will be available in some
release of PHP. A new news item in this case would be nice, to
announce a milestone in the php-apache front, especially regarding
*security*.
What kind of
Hi!
It would be nice to have a list of php.net sites available
online at http://php.net/sites.php linked from the uppper
menu on all pages.
I only know a few, and never used bonsai.php.net or lxr.php.net,
as I am not part of the development team. So it would be nice
from some guys, who can put
Khm...
- Original Message -
From: Preiß, Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 8:58 AM
Subject: PHP 4.1.2 zip package [5,824Kb] - 12 March 2002
Note: This File (PHP 4.1.2 zip package [5,824Kb] - 12 March 2002) seems to
include PHP/4.1.3-dev,
Hi!
From hour to hour we receive questions at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about the availability of PHP 4.1.2 for Windows. First I
tried to give an estimate, but now I don't know what to say.
Will there ever be a PHP 4.1.2 for windows, or a 4.1.3???
Guys are waiting for the security fix... Why to kick
AFAIK the problem is not afecting windows users. Because of that there is
no windows binary.
AFAIK it affect Windows. Forwarded letter from Zeev:
- Original Message -
From: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rasmus
AFAIK Why not? === Why they are not required?
But regardless of this, we should either declare on
the website, that they are not required, or release
that version. As Zeev pointed out again, it will
be available sometime in the future.
Goba
As far as I see Rasmus says :They aren't really
Could you direct me to where I can find the PHP 4.1.2 installer for
windows
or is it not available yet?
If it would be available we would have put up a download link.
Please wait for the guys to compile and pack it up.
Goba [one [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
PHP Development Mailing List
At 10:32 AM 2/5/2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
Under which ugly licence is it now? =) I'm all for make sure these are
compatible, so that the two repositories caan be merged.
GPL, I believe?
It's GPL. We also have a LICENSE file in the root of the phpdoc
repository to make this clear for
have we ever decided on this? in our code do we go for tabs or spaces? Is
there a style guide anywhere on this?
Tabs, they've been used historically.
As this was crossposted to phpdoc, I consider it a question for
phpdoc too. We use one space for XML indentation and 4 spaces
for PHP codes in
Hi!
As all you know, we have php.net shortcuts for manual
pages, so php.net/exit go to the exit() function page,
etc.
As one of the php.net webmasters I realized, that we
also give php.net webpage addresses so often to people
like php.net/downloads.php, php.net/links.php or
php.net/support.php.
Hi!
I would like to propose a diff like bug update header style,
so to use
ID: 15357
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Status: Open
+Status: Closed
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: Win XP
$CUSTOM_SHORTCUTS = array (
'ini' = 'configuration',
'windows' = 'install.windows',
'install' = 'installation'
How about starting an archive of terms posted into
the php.net search box. This will make for some
good data which will eventually provide info to
expand this
On a related note, www.php.net needs a nasty popup
that says Choose a mirror!!! ;)
This is for a long time on our TODO list. Actually
a nice automatic mirror chooser, and advice box
would be good, and not an annoying popup box IMHO.
This will be a nice system. Btw, was kidding
Hi!
We just noticed a major problem in the docs, and so we
would like to invent a new name for php.ini settings.
Now look at
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.configure.php and
http://www.php.net/manual/en/configuration.php pages
I am sure that it is confusing for people, to have two
I mean, you could check php_version() and stick in some extract() calls
for older versions wherever you use the superglobals, but that seems
rather ugly.
Some really want it, let's define the most efficient/least ugly types of
hacks :) For example with get, checking phpversion,
I
?php
session_start();
if(ini_get('register_globals') AND !isset($session_global_var)){
$session_global_var = array();
}
session_register('session_global_var');
if(ini_get('register_globals')){
$SESSION = $session_global_var;
}else{
$SESSION =
I mean, you could check php_version() and stick in some extract()
calls
for older versions wherever you use the superglobals, but that seems
rather ugly.
Some really want it, let's define the most efficient/least ugly types
of
hacks :) For example with get, checking
The question is to check for $_GET [isset($_GET)] or phpversion()
4.1.0 [version_compare() is the function for that thing :)].
Well, you are right, that if we are 4.1.0, you can do:
fake.php?_GET[a]=b_GET[c]=d
so my idea may not be that good :)
Yep ...
I'ld like
Hi!
As the new year is over now, can someone be so kind
to compile and release a PHP 4.1.1 for windows?
Please also make the windows file names reflect
the standards.
Thanks,
Goba
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no?
Well, no php-dev people is engaged to know DocBook XML, the
doc building process, or translation related things. No phpdoc people
engaged to know C, some know very few C, or have no experience
with C at all.
I have seen a note
Anyway, this is a doc problem. Forwarded to PHP-DOC.
Are you sure? Are the official ZendAPI docs suddenly in the
/phpdoc cvs tree? Couldn't find them there ... IMHO they're
still at zend.com and beside me no one hasn't updated them
for a while.
At phpdoc, we have an
Hi!
Forwarding this request to php-dev, where people make the
packages :)
Goba [one [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Original Message -
From: Alexei Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:13 PM
Subject: php downloads
Hello Webmaster,
I
Does anyone mind if I update session.xml?
I would like to prevent flood of bug reports.
Thank you.
Update as you see fit.
Goba
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the
+ li?php download_link(php-4.1.0-Win32.zip, PHP 4.1.0 zip
package); ? - 12
+ li?php download_link(php410-installer.exe, PHP 4.1.0 installer);
? - 12
Are there any plans to make the windows binary file names
standard... So eg. php-4.1.0-installer.exe sor something alike.
It would be really
Hi!
As written in the PHP weekly summary on zend.com:
| Sebastian Bergmann has confirmed that he can successfully
| compile and install PHP on his Windows XP setup. As of
| this week, XP will be added to the list of platforms that
| PHP works on.
As noone added it to the manual till now, I am
Nope... at least, that's not what I've heard.
Windows 2000 uses c:\winnt (for php.ini) and c:\winnt\system32 (for
php4ts.dll)
Windows XP uses c:\windows and c:\windows\system32
Hm, this may well be, since I 'just' updated the system from Windows
2000 to WindowsXP and did no
Nope... at least, that's not what I've heard.
Windows 2000 uses c:\winnt (for php.ini) and c:\winnt\system32
(for
php4ts.dll)
Windows XP uses c:\windows and c:\windows\system32
Hm, this may well be, since I 'just' updated the system from
Windows
2000 to
56 matches
Mail list logo
