Perhaps the php-doc guys can set up the basics (I don't have
time to become a doc guru) so that we at least have somewhere
to put it, and that might encourage people to write some docs.
Also, whenever a new API comes along (like zend_parse_parameters)
it could be put in there from the
Kinda like the FSF assignment. This is so that we can publish these docs
in books free of charge, without having to run after everybody who
contributed. Don't worry, we don't get a nickel out of it.
I dunno what its under now but the Open Documentation License is nice as
then main
There is a tree in place, http://www.zend.com/zend/api.php for more
information... Albeit these docs are way out of date and are very
rudimentary its just no one with api familiarity, also has the
patience
to improve them :)
Yes; I have a local copy of those docs.
They are
At 09:51 10-09-01, James Moore wrote:
Kinda like the FSF assignment. This is so that we can publish these docs
in books free of charge, without having to run after everybody who
contributed. Don't worry, we don't get a nickel out of it.
I dunno what its under now but the Open
Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
At 14:44 09-09-01, Jani Taskinen wrote:
If ZE was properly documented, people didn't have to rely on
only the sources.
By the way, your post had absolutely nothing to do with the
subject of the discussion.
I think it does; if there were some
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Wez Furlong wrote:
Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
At 14:44 09-09-01, Jani Taskinen wrote:
If ZE was properly documented, people didn't have to rely on
only the sources.
By the way, your post had absolutely nothing to do with the
subject of the
At 00:26 10-09-01, Wez Furlong wrote:
Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
At 14:44 09-09-01, Jani Taskinen wrote:
If ZE was properly documented, people didn't have to rely on
only the sources.
By the way, your post had absolutely nothing to do with the
subject of the
At 00:27 10-09-01, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Oh yeah, not to mention the license is pretty bad :) I give up all
rights
to the material that I write (more so than an assignment of rights,
which is standard for contributors to commercial texts), and you
don't even get payed for
On Sunday, September 9, 2001, at 05:45 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 00:26 10-09-01, Wez Furlong wrote:
Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
At 14:44 09-09-01, Jani Taskinen wrote:
If ZE was properly documented, people didn't have to rely on
only the sources.
By the way, your
George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Sunday, September 9, 2001, at 05:45 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 00:26 10-09-01, Wez Furlong wrote:
Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
At 14:44 09-09-01, Jani Taskinen wrote:
If ZE was properly documented, people didn't have to rely on
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 00:27 10-09-01, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Oh yeah, not to mention the license is pretty bad :) I give up all
rights
to the material that I write (more so than an assignment of rights,
which is standard for contributors to commercial
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 00:27 10-09-01, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Oh yeah, not to mention the license is pretty bad :) I give up all
rights
to the material that I write (more so than an assignment of rights,
At 00:59 10-09-01, George Schlossnagle wrote:
The reason I told Jani it had nothing to do with the discussion was that
I think that this is wrong...
The reason I disagree is that a large number of people (today, probably
most) code based on examples, not on documentation. Nothing forces you
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 00:59 10-09-01, George Schlossnagle wrote:
The reason I told Jani it had nothing to do with the discussion was that
I think that this is wrong...
The reason I disagree is that a large number of people (today, probably
most) code based on examples,
At 01:28 10-09-01, Sterling Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 00:27 10-09-01, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Oh yeah, not to mention the license is pretty bad :) I give up all
rights
to the material that I write (more so than an assignment of rights,
At 01:15 10-09-01, Egon Schmid wrote:
Not writing documentation is certainly within your right, but this is a
poor argument for not doing so. Certainly a main reason that people
code from examples and not documentation is when documentation is poor.
Sorry, couldn't resist. The
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 01:15 10-09-01, Egon Schmid wrote:
Not writing documentation is certainly within your right, but this is a
poor argument for not doing so. Certainly a main reason that people
code from examples and not documentation is when documentation is poor.
Sorry,
At 02:19 10-09-01, Egon Schmid wrote:
To make it short. You are yourself on the list of authors. Should I
deprecate you?
If it makes you feel better, sure, go ahead. The only reason I'm there is
because I've written the documentation for the MySQL module, but I realize
it's not too much, and
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 01:28 10-09-01, Sterling Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 00:27 10-09-01, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Oh yeah, not to mention the license is pretty bad :) I give up all
rights
to the material that I write
At 02:29 10-09-01, Sterling Hughes wrote:
;) -- I know they chose the license (you forget, I used to work
for one of them, and I'm still friends with the other :) The
license makes sense from the Book's point of view, but as an Open
Source License it doesn't make sense
20 matches
Mail list logo
