[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5 Features

I doubt you're going to get a really good answer for this question because 1. PHP 5.0 isn't out yet and won't be out for a while. (Not until Zend Engine 2.0 is done, I'd assume.) 2. This is a PHP development group, so do you really think you're going to get an unbaised answer here? Would you

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 17:09, Joao Prado Maia wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > At 16:06 02/01/2002, Björn Schotte wrote: > > >* Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > > Well, I think that the main motivation for separating the modules away was > > > > the release schedule. I.e., separ

[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

Hi, Peter Illes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has this feature request he posted in php.windows. Looks useful to me for php 5: My original problem is simpler than that, though: I'd like to pre-allocate a buffer for the string. Is this possible in PHP? This is possible in both C/C++ and Delphi (with SetL

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

#x27;]['media_regionaam']; > > > > Works great for us. > > Sander > > > > - Original Message ----- > > From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Joe Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

Joe Webster wrote: > Example: > > We have 200+ radio station websites in a network. The way we store > data > in the database is by call letters (since some websites have more than one > domain). So call letters (whor-fm :) ) are the key to just about > everything we do. So, in the vhost

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

e PHP script with >$GLOBALS['HTTP_SERVER_VARS']['media_regionaam']; > >Works great for us. >Sander > >- Original Message - >From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Joe Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

ay, January 02, 2002 11:15 PM > To: Joe Webster; Zeev Suraski > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5 > > > Hi, > > We do exactly the same with Apache SetEnv: > > SetEnv media_regionaamapeldoorn > SetEnv media_regioid

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

ith > $GLOBALS['HTTP_SERVER_VARS']['media_regionaam']; > > Works great for us. > Sander > > - Original Message - > From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Joe Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

great for us. Sander - Original Message - From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Joe Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:40 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5 > This could probably be done.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

Awesome, that will rock. Now, not to be an impatient lil' dork, but is there something that I could easily do to my mod_php that would swing it for me? Thanks for the help, Joe "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 5.1.0.14.2.20020103004035.04527460@localhost">news:5.1.0.14.2.20020

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

This could probably be done. It does sound helpful. Zeev At 00:29 03/01/2002, Joe Webster wrote: >Yes it would have to be in every script in the vhost, location or directory >directive. > >It could be a constant =) That would make my life easier. > >Thanks, >-Joe > >"Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

Yes it would have to be in every script in the vhost, location or directory directive. It could be a constant =) That would make my life easier. Thanks, -Joe "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 5.1.0.14.2.20020102234728.028651c0@localhost">news:5.1.0.14.2.20020102234728.028651c0

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

That is our fall-back plan, but that's not terribly effecient =) "Joao Prado Maia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Joe Webster wrote: > I have something that I am currently dealing with: > > Using mod_perl with apache, you

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

Example: We have 200+ radio station websites in a network. The way we store data in the database is by call letters (since some websites have more than one domain). So call letters (whor-fm :) ) are the key to just about everything we do. So, in the vhost file for apache we want to set the st

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Joe Webster wrote: > I have something that I am currently dealing with: > > Using mod_perl with apache, you can put this in a apache directive > (vhost, location, directory): > PerlSetVar somevarname somevarval > and that would pre-define somevarname equal

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Joe Webster wrote: > I have something that I am currently dealing with: > > Using mod_perl with apache, you can put this in a apache directive > (vhost, location, directory): > PerlSetVar somevarname somevarval > and that would pre-define somevarname equal

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

At 23:33 02/01/2002, Joe Webster wrote: >I have something that I am currently dealing with: > > Using mod_perl with apache, you can put this in a apache directive >(vhost, location, directory): > PerlSetVar somevarname somevarval > and that would pre-define somevarname equal to

[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

I have something that I am currently dealing with: Using mod_perl with apache, you can put this in a apache directive (vhost, location, directory): PerlSetVar somevarname somevarval and that would pre-define somevarname equal to somevarval. We are trying to move completely to

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

v Suraski > Cc: Björn Schotte; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Dickmeiss; Jim Winstead; php- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5 > > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > At 16:06 02/01/2002, Björn Schotte wrote: > > >* Zeev Suraski wrote:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: > At 16:06 02/01/2002, Björn Schotte wrote: > >* Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > Well, I think that the main motivation for separating the modules away was > > > the release schedule. I.e., separating the release schedule of each > > > extension from the releas

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

At 16:06 02/01/2002, Björn Schotte wrote: >* Zeev Suraski wrote: > > Well, I think that the main motivation for separating the modules away was > > the release schedule. I.e., separating the release schedule of each > > extension from the release schedule of the PHP core itself. > >Jep. Just to n

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

* Zeev Suraski wrote: > Well, I think that the main motivation for separating the modules away was > the release schedule. I.e., separating the release schedule of each > extension from the release schedule of the PHP core itself. Jep. Just to note: I'm +1 for it. > If we still > have a ful

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

At 14:01 02/01/2002, Björn Schotte wrote: >* Zeev Suraski wrote: > > >Yep. But what about a php_4_3_4_core.tgz (core PHP/ZE/TSRM with > > >core extensions) and a release of php_4_3_4_complete.tgz packaged > > >with all extensions together? > > That can happen, but what does that buy you? > >I can

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

* Zeev Suraski wrote: > >Yep. But what about a php_4_3_4_core.tgz (core PHP/ZE/TSRM with > >core extensions) and a release of php_4_3_4_complete.tgz packaged > >with all extensions together? > That can happen, but what does that buy you? I can err myself, but it's some sort of BC for me in the co

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

At 13:41 02/01/2002, Björn Schotte wrote: >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > and remain that way. It's much easier to distribute (one download), and > > easier to install. (No more fetching of PECL extensions). > >Yep. But what about a php_4_3_4_core.tgz (core PHP/ZE/TSRM with >core extensions) and a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > and remain that way. It's much easier to distribute (one download), and > easier to install. (No more fetching of PECL extensions). Yep. But what about a php_4_3_4_core.tgz (core PHP/ZE/TSRM with core extensions) and a release of php_4_3_4_complete.tgz packaged with a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Adam Dickmeiss wrote: > IMHO, all extensions should be PECL. If it's easier to have some > extensions part of core PHP 'cause they're important, then it's a > sign of bad PECL design. PHP should be the glue for SAPI, > extensions (PECL, I hope) and Zend. No more. I do not agr

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:56:53PM -, Jim Winstead wrote: > Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Zend Engine 2 has made lots of progress. > > is there an up-to-date summary of the changes beyond the original ze2 > proposal? example scripts that show the new features? > > > Unrelat

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

Hi, > having everything bundled is a strength for people who install from > source, but it really doesn't do much to help people who haved installed > from a distribution or are in a shared-hosting situation. those are the well, i dont agree with that. think about people that are not hosting them

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

At 05:56 PM 1/1/2002 +, Jim Winstead wrote: >(and 'unimportant' is a dangerous word. obviously that depends on the >situation.) I think it's obvious what I meant. Andi -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

Jim Winstead wrote: > is there an up-to-date summary of the changes beyond the original ze2 > proposal? example scripts that show the new features? ZendEngine2/ZEND_CHANGES for starters. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I

[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Zend Engine 2 has made lots of progress. is there an up-to-date summary of the changes beyond the original ze2 proposal? example scripts that show the new features? > Unrelated, I'm still waiting to hear exactly what mechanism the PEAR guys > implem