[PHP-DEV] apache2 and php

2002-04-02 Thread Alexis
I try to install php with apache2 on FreeBSD. I took the cvs of today of apache2 and php. ./configure --without-mysql --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs make [...] /bin/sh libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -I/usr/local/src/php4/sapi/apache2filter -I/usr/local/src/php4/sapi/apac he2filter -

RE: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-26 Thread August
EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today I completely understand your point. Some people feel they need those extra 10% for production machines. But are you actually planning on running Apache 2 on a heavily loaded production machine? If yes, I think it might still be

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-26 Thread Andi Gutmans
I completely understand your point. Some people feel they need those extra 10% for production machines. But are you actually planning on running Apache 2 on a heavily loaded production machine? If yes, I think it might still be a bit early to abandon 1.3.x. If no and you just want to mess aroun

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
I have set up dozens of production servers in the past couple of years and not a single one of them is running the static version. If there are issues with the DSO, then file a bug report on that so we can fix it. -Rasmus On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote: > Jim wrote: > >the fact that --with-

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
August wrote: > Please give a complete url. The apache dso docs just describe dso. Most > instructions on creating a high performance version of php recommend > static compiles for good reason. > > Info and status are not php. They have very different usage patterns > (used much less frequently)

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread August
Jim wrote: >the fact that --with-apache does not work with apache 2.x is not a bug. I see the inability to compile a static version of php for apache as the bug. Not too concerned with the semantics of the command. My experience may be abnormal, but for production work, static compiles seem a mus

[PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread August
Hey Yasuo, Could you give a complete url to the DSO recommendation? Most instructions on creating a high performance version of php recommend static compiles. Thanks... - AZ -Original Message- From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] August wrote: > Sebastian wrote: >>if PHP's

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread Jim Winstead
August <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as I know httpd2 still allows static modules. yes, but the --with-apache option for php4 tries to compile a static version of php4 for apache 1.x. maybe someone will create a --with-apache2 option that allows compiling a static version of php4 for apac

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread Chand
At 09:51 AM 2/26/2002 +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: >August wrote: > >>I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it >>makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of compile is >>negligible when looking at something that will be installed for >>timeframes exceedi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
August wrote: > Sebastian wrote: > >>I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled modules or >> > >>if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO >>anyhow? It's the preferred method. >> > > Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread August
Sebastian wrote: >I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled modules or >if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO >anyhow? It's the preferred method. Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented somewhere? I find DSO useful for

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread August
Jim wrote: >--with-apache is specific to apache1. you have to use --with-apxs2 to >build against apache2. Apxs normally builds DSO versions of php. Under apache, DSO stands for Dynamic Shared Object support, and there are some important differences between dso and static compiles, primarily perha

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread Jim Winstead
August <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [php4-200202242100]# ./configure --with-apache=../httpd-2.0.32 --with-apache is specific to apache1. you have to use --with-apxs2 to build against apache2. jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/un

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-25 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
August wrote: > I have a build framework that I use extremely frequently, and I don't > believe much has changed with it. Has the procedure changed for > statically compiling php with apache? I haven't seen any documentation > of it. I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-24 Thread August
Sebastian, I've been tracking this reasonably closely. [php4-200202242100]# ./configure --with-apache=../httpd-2.0.32 Configuring SAPI modules checking for AOLserver support... no checking for Apache module support via DSO through APXS... no checking for Apache module support... no configure: e

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-23 Thread Chand
At 05:52 PM 2/23/2002 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >Chand wrote: >> are you sure you've tried compiling it as a built-in module in Apache? > >$ cd /usr/src/httpd-2.0 >$ ./configure --enable-so --enable-mods-shared=ALL >$ make >$ make install >$ cd /usr/src/php4 >$ ./con

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-23 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Chand wrote: > are you sure you've tried compiling it as a built-in module in Apache? $ cd /usr/src/httpd-2.0 $ ./configure --enable-so --enable-mods-shared=ALL $ make $ make install $ cd /usr/src/php4 $ ./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs $ make $

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-23 Thread Chand
At 08:14 AM 2/23/2002 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >August wrote: >> There's been a bit of traffic on the apache dev list about this as >> well, most of it indicating the problem lies on the PHP side of >> things... This is something I've been tracking for a while, waiting >> for the Apache

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-22 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
August wrote: > There's been a bit of traffic on the apache dev list about this as > well, most of it indicating the problem lies on the PHP side of > things... This is something I've been tracking for a while, waiting > for the Apache beta (which is pretty close to their final) before > reall

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-22 Thread Chand
At 01:06 PM 2/22/2002 -0800, August wrote: >There's been a bit of traffic on the apache dev list about this as well, >most of it indicating the problem lies on the PHP side of things... This >is something I've been tracking for a while, waiting for the Apache beta >(which is pretty close to their

[PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

2002-02-22 Thread August
There's been a bit of traffic on the apache dev list about this as well, most of it indicating the problem lies on the PHP side of things... This is something I've been tracking for a while, waiting for the Apache beta (which is pretty close to their final) before really worrying about the php sup

[PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today.

2002-02-20 Thread Austin Gonyou
I got Apache2 2.0.32 beta, compiled, installed, and happy. I got PHP from CVS last night and this afternoon. PHP Compiled and installed using the following configure: configure --with-apxs2=/usr/web/bin/apxs --with-ssl --with-jpeg --with-png also configure --with-apxs2=/usr/web/bin/apxs no d