Please ask these questions on the php-general list.
--Wez.
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, electroteque wrote:
sorry about the false alarm , if you go here u will see a working example
http://galleries.dyndns.org:1023/progress.php
i had to add both flush functions together to work , obviosuly flsuh
I think we have a bit of a language gap, which is fine, but let's settle
for that:
Please make sure that if you have a small doubt regarding a certain
behavior, especially in a core component of PHP such as the output
buffering layer or the session module - you ask the relevant author(s)
Zeev Suraski wrote:
Aha, ok, that actually makes quite a bit of sense. If there's a bit of
output that remains inside the buffers, and the session module gets
deactivated before this output is flushed, we're in trouble... I'll
take a look at it.
i think i've been bitten by this using
At 10:55 07/10/2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
As I said before, I don't touch any of chunk size related code.
You've removed all applicable lines regarding to implicit flush
thing.
No implicit flush please. Enough. It's over. Seriously, please, it's
really getting on my nerves already :) [*]
Zeev Suraski wrote:
The least you should do is
ask either Sascha or me how come it uses chunked buffering, and whether
it's not a bug. You would have gotten a pretty clear response saying
that it fully supports chunked buffering.
No. I don't think I need to ask.
It may be able to be
At 14:51 07/10/2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
The least you should do is ask either Sascha or me how come it uses
chunked buffering, and whether it's not a bug. You would have gotten a
pretty clear response saying that it fully supports chunked buffering.
No. I don't think I
Zeev Suraski wrote:
The least you should do is
ask either Sascha or me how come it uses chunked buffering, and whether
it's not a bug. You would have gotten a pretty clear response saying
that it fully supports chunked buffering.
No. I don't think I need to ask.
Sometimes you do. If
Agreed, it's only common courtesy.
david
Zeev Suraski wrote:
The least you should do is
ask either Sascha or me how come it uses chunked buffering, and
whether
it's not a bug. You would have gotten a pretty clear response saying
that it fully supports chunked buffering.
No. I
At 17:53 07/10/2002, David Reid wrote:
Agreed, it's only common courtesy.
At minimum. When we're dealing with the core of an application as popular
as PHP, it's also an issue of responsibility.
Zeev
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
At 18:43 07/10/2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Can you see if calling php_end_ob_buffers() in the session deactivate
function, in case BG(url_adapt_state_ex).active is true, solves this
problems?
Note the condition here:
There is an even
I understand, but what if you don't call ob_flush()? Does it work properly?
The bug from 4.2.3 does not reappear here. The rewriter
kicks in using the final combination of ini settings.
- Sascha
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
Really? Yasuo, people have been requesting that we disable your write
access to the full php4 tree, and uptil now I was against it. But this
attitude is making me reconsider my stand on this.
This is the 2nd time in the last couple of days that I notice that your
12 matches
Mail list logo
