This discussion should take place on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I would go for PHP5, however that means Zeev will commit suicide...
>
> Why not jump over numbers 5 & 6 and call it PHP 7 ? :)
> Or do the Micros
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php 4.1 or php 5.0
> I think both for Zend 2 and for the cleanup version of PHP (if they happen
> at the same time or not) it is important to come up with how to do the
> development. We can eit
/01 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>Resending as we only got one answer...
>
>Andi
>
>>Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:53:47 +0300
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],"Brian Moon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> "php developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>From: Andi Gutman
Resending as we only got one answer...
Andi
>Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:53:47 +0300
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],"Brian Moon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "php developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [PHP-D
I think both for Zend 2 and for the cleanup version of PHP (if they happen
at the same time or not) it is important to come up with how to do the
development. We can either work in a branch or create a new CVS tree.
They both have their pros & cons, but especially for the PHP CVS which is a
mov
On Wednesday 04 July 2001 17:12, Brian Moon wrote:
> FWIW, I am +1 on PHP5. There are a lot of things in the language that need
> to be cleaned up. People here more familiar with other closed languages
> have gotten confused about things like case, underscores, haystack and
> needle, the way som
FWIW, I am +1 on PHP5. There are a lot of things in the language that need
to be cleaned up. People here more familiar with other closed languages
have gotten confused about things like case, underscores, haystack and
needle, the way some array functions return an array and some modify the
passe
