[PHP-DEV] ext/srm
I though I saw a mail regarding moving srm extension to php4/ext repository? However I might be blind, as I can't find it on cvs.php.net, or the snapshots. Regards - robin -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP-DEV] SAP DB
Yes, back when SAP opensourced SAP DB there was a lot of speculation was to why they did it. Actuallywe installed it on our test server, but never actually tested it. It seems very feature complete and well documented. Using ODBC sucks (especially with the problems it creates with other RDBMSs), so a native driver would be nice. Anyways I remember that they announced that they would continue development and would improve the SAP DB OS site. I haven't really checked if they followed through with their promise. Best regards, Lukas Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ DybNet Internet Solutions GbR Alt Moabit 89 10559 Berlin Germany Tel. : +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax : +49 30 83 22 50 07 www.dybnet.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ -Original Message- From: alex black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP-DEV] SAP DB hi all, One of the binarycloud developers just told me to have a look at the SAP OS database, SAPDB. I'm going to test it tomorrow to see if it actually does what it claims, but this _looks_ like serious OS competition to Oracle, and if it is I would very much like to use it for my next project. So, question: Has anyone used SAPDB with PHP? If so, experiences? And if not, are there plans for drivers? I looked in the manual and I didn't see any mention of SAPDB. Oh, and I just found a mention of PHP on the SAPDB site. Looks like the connection is over ODBC, which I really _really_ dislike... are there plans for anything native? like a sapdb_connect :)? In any case I think this database has a _HUGE_ amount of potential and PHP would benefit if access to SAPDB was possible. please e-mail me directly as I am not subscribed to the NGs: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks, _alex -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/srm
Hello, On 25 Feb 2002, Robin Ericsson wrote: I though I saw a mail regarding moving srm extension to php4/ext repository? However I might be blind, as I can't find it on cvs.php.net, or the snapshots. You're not blind :), we removed it. There was a too big problem with compability with the CVS version of the Daemon. You can get it from the SRM CVS: cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/repository co php_srm regards, Derick -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
August wrote: I have a build framework that I use extremely frequently, and I don't believe much has changed with it. Has the procedure changed for statically compiling php with apache? I haven't seen any documentation of it. I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled modules or if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO anyhow? It's the preferred method. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/ -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] SAP DB
alex black wrote: hi all, One of the binarycloud developers just told me to have a look at the SAP OS database, SAPDB. SAP DB is just another name for AdabasD from a programmers point of view- I'm going to test it tomorrow to see if it actually does what it claims, but this _looks_ like serious OS competition to Oracle, and if it is I would very much like to use it for my next project. So, question: Has anyone used SAPDB with PHP? If so, experiences? And if not, are there plans for drivers? I looked in the manual and I didn't see any mention of SAPDB. http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.odbc.php Oh, and I just found a mention of PHP on the SAPDB site. Looks like the connection is over ODBC, which I really _really_ dislike... are there plans for anything native? like a sapdb_connect :)? from the link mentinoned above: In addition to normal ODBC support, the Unified ODBC functions in PHP allow you to access several databases that have borrowed the semantics of the ODBC API to implement their own API. Instead of maintaining multiple database drivers that were all nearly identical, these drivers have been unified into a single set of ODBC functions. so the call interface to AdabasD/SapDB looks like ODBC, but you have direct access to the database using PHP, you don't have to deal with ODBC driver management and all the stuff if you don't want you In any case I think this database has a _HUGE_ amount of potential and PHP would benefit if access to SAPDB was possible. as said above: it is all there ... just the documentation could need a little update ... -- Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77 Wir stellen für Sie aus auf der CeBIT 2002 und freuen uns in Halle 6 auf Ihren Besuch am Stand H 18 -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] call_user_function()
Ok,
I know ive already posted this but no responded. So I'll do it again.
Currently call_user_function() doesn't call overloaded class methods.
I hacked together a function to get around this. Does anyone want to look at it
and see if it's gunna mess anything up as far as zend execution. if not put it
in as part as the normal call_user_function.
int my_call_user_function(HashTable *function_table, zval **object_pp, zval
*function_name, zval *retval_ptr, int param_count, zval *params[] TSRMLS_DC)
{
if(call_user_function(function_table, object_pp, function_name, retval_ptr,
param_count, params TSRMLS_CC) == FAILURE)
{
if(Z_OBJCE_PP(object_pp)-handle_function_call != NULL)
{
zend_overloaded_element overloaded_element;
zend_property_reference property_reference;
zend_function_state function_state;
zend_function_state *original_function_state_ptr;
int i;
overloaded_element.element = *function_name;
overloaded_element.type = OE_IS_METHOD;
function_state.function = (zend_function *)
emalloc(sizeof(zend_function));
function_state.function-type = ZEND_OVERLOADED_FUNCTION;
function_state.function-common.arg_types = NULL;
function_state.function-overloaded_function.function_name =
Z_STRVAL_P(function_name);
property_reference.object = *object_pp;
property_reference.type = BP_VAR_NA;
property_reference.elements_list = (zend_llist
*)emalloc(sizeof(zend_llist));
zend_llist_init(property_reference.elements_list,
sizeof(zend_overloaded_element), NULL, 0);
zend_llist_add_element(property_reference.elements_list,
overloaded_element);
//Build argument stack
for(i = 0;i param_count;i++)
zend_ptr_stack_push(EG(argument_stack), params[i]);
zend_ptr_stack_n_push(EG(argument_stack), 2, (void
*)param_count, NULL);
EG(function_state_ptr) = function_state;
Z_OBJCE_PP(object_pp)-handle_function_call(param_count,
retval_ptr,
*object_pp, 1 TSRMLS_CC, property_reference);
EG(function_state_ptr) = original_function_state_ptr;
zend_llist_destroy(property_reference.elements_list);
efree(property_reference.elements_list);
efree(function_state.function);
zend_ptr_stack_clear_multiple(TSRMLS_C);
return SUCCESS;
}
}
}
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP-DEV] --with-sybase and --with-ibm-db2 conflict
Casey, You may wish to try iODBC instead of UnixODBC. I'd also suggest trying OpenLink's Single-Tier ODBC drivers. Best regards, Andrew Hill Director of Technology Evangelism OpenLink Software http://www.openlinksw.com Universal Data Access Data Integration Technology Providers -Original Message- From: Casey Allen Shobe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 4:46 PM To: Brian Bruns; Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] --with-sybase and --with-ibm-db2 conflict On Sunday 24 February 2002 16:16, Brian Bruns wrote: I have both those compiled into my setup at work so I can take a look, we use --with-sybase-ct to work around the issue, I think we also had to make sure that --with-ibm-db2 appeared in the configure line prior to the other. Well, I tried using --with-sybase-ct, but I'm actually using FreeTDS to communicate with MSSQL, and for some reason --with-sybase-ct won't work with the FreeTDS libraries when trying to built PHP following the instructions here: http://www.freetds.org/userguide/php.html#AEN945 The ODBC support is buggy...as in, I can connect to and run queries on both DB2 and MSSQL via isql (comes with unixodbc) on the command line, but via PHP, only DB2 works when I try to use both within a script. -- Casey Allen Shobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] php xml documentation
Where would i find out how to create the necessary xml docs so my extension docs would flow into php's website? - Brad __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: katow
Maintaining the documentation Translating the documentation -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] php xml documentation
On 2002.02.25 15:07 brad lafountain wrote: Where would i find out how to create the necessary xml docs so my extension docs would flow into php's website? Actually, you're asking this on the wrong mailinglist... use PHP-DOC for this. Anyway, have a look at http://cvs.php.net/cvs.php/phpdoc/howto and download howto.html.tar.gz which contains nice instructions. Sander -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] XML-RPC extension
Hi Does someone is writing(or plannning to) XML-RPC extension? I tried Edd Dumbill's code. When trying to send/receive small amount of data - no problems. Not fast as a light but satisfying - 0.2s. When I tried to receive big PHP array(100) elements (arrays) the return from the server was 50k and the working time - 4s. After some profiling I found that most of the time is spent in the XML deserialization. I thought that WDDX extension will not be more fast but not. Deserialization of those 50kilobytes, which was encapsulated into XML-RPC packet for transportation, tooks only from 0.03 to 0.08s! So I think about tweaking wddx.c for xml-rpc.c All comments are appreciated. Best regards, Andrey Hristov -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Delete checked files
Hi everybody,
I show a list of files that I upload to the user's folder using the next
code:
$path= ../clients/$user;
$dir = opendir ($root);
while ($archivo = readdir ($dir))
{
$size = filesize($path/$filename);
$size = ($size/1024);
$size = intval($size * 100 ) / 100;
if ($filename!= . $filename!=..)
{
echo trtda
href='$path/$filename'$filename/a/tdtd$size Kb/td/tr;
}
}
I want to add a checkbox in every file i get in the user's folder. My
question is:
Is there any way to use some kind of function to delete selected files? I am
not sure if i can use javascript to evaluate which is checked and how. And
after that evaluation, how to call a unlink ($filename) to delete the files.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Nau
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Patch to extract()
I've added an extra option extract() to have potential variable names passed
to a user defined callback function. If this function then returns true,
it's extracted, if not it's not.
Anyone care to apply/check it?
Eg.:
?php
function extract_callback($varname){
return preg_match('/^var/', $varname);
}
$var['var_1'] = 1;
$var['var_2'] = 1;
$var['blaat'] = 1;
extract($var, EXTR_USER_CALLBACK, 'extract_callback');
printf('var_1: %s br', $var_1);
printf('var_2: %s br', $var_2);
printf('blaat: %s br', $blaat);
?
Index: array.c
===
RCS file: /repository/php4/ext/standard/array.c,v
retrieving revision 1.156
diff -u -u -r1.156 array.c
--- array.c 5 Feb 2002 20:43:48 - 1.156
+++ array.c 25 Feb 2002 16:07:10 -
@@ -59,7 +59,8 @@
#defineEXTR_PREFIX_INVALID 4
#defineEXTR_PREFIX_IF_EXISTS 5
#defineEXTR_IF_EXISTS 6
-
+#defineEXTR_USER_CALLBACK 7
+
#define SORT_REGULAR 0
#define SORT_NUMERIC 1
#defineSORT_STRING 2
@@ -86,7 +87,8 @@
REGISTER_LONG_CONSTANT(EXTR_PREFIX_INVALID, EXTR_PREFIX_INVALID, CONST_CS |
CONST_PERSISTENT);
REGISTER_LONG_CONSTANT(EXTR_PREFIX_IF_EXISTS, EXTR_PREFIX_IF_EXISTS,
CONST_CS | CONST_PERSISTENT);
REGISTER_LONG_CONSTANT(EXTR_IF_EXISTS, EXTR_IF_EXISTS, CONST_CS |
CONST_PERSISTENT);
-
+ REGISTER_LONG_CONSTANT(EXTR_USER_CALLBACK, EXTR_USER_CALLBACK, CONST_CS |
+CONST_PERSISTENT);
+
REGISTER_LONG_CONSTANT(SORT_ASC, SORT_ASC, CONST_CS | CONST_PERSISTENT);
REGISTER_LONG_CONSTANT(SORT_DESC, SORT_DESC, CONST_CS | CONST_PERSISTENT);
@@ -1137,7 +1139,7 @@
PHP_FUNCTION(extract)
{
zval **var_array, **z_extract_type, **prefix;
- zval **entry, *data;
+ zval **entry, *data, *user_callback_retval, **user_callback_args[1],
+*user_callback_arg;
char *var_name;
smart_str final_name = {0};
ulong num_key;
@@ -1163,6 +1165,11 @@
php_error(E_WARNING, %s() expects a prefix to be
specified,
get_active_function_name(TSRMLS_C));
return;
+
+ }else if(extract_type == EXTR_USER_CALLBACK){
+ php_error(E_WARNING, %s() expects a user defined
+function to be specified,
+ get_active_function_name(TSRMLS_C));
+ return;
}
break;
@@ -1180,7 +1187,7 @@
break;
}
- if (extract_type EXTR_OVERWRITE || extract_type EXTR_IF_EXISTS) {
+ if (extract_type EXTR_OVERWRITE || extract_type EXTR_USER_CALLBACK) {
php_error(E_WARNING, Unknown extract type in call to %s(),
get_active_function_name(TSRMLS_C));
return;
@@ -1248,8 +1255,30 @@
} else
smart_str_appendl(final_name,
var_name, var_name_len);
}
- break;
-
+ break;
+
+ case EXTR_USER_CALLBACK:
+ user_callback_arg = emalloc(sizeof(zval));
+ MAKE_STD_ZVAL(user_callback_arg);
+ ZVAL_STRING(user_callback_arg, var_name, 0);
+
+ *(user_callback_args[0]) = user_callback_arg;
+
+ if(call_user_function_ex(EG(function_table), NULL,
+*prefix, user_callback_retval, 1, user_callback_args, 0, NULL TSRMLS_CC) != SUCCESS){
+ php_error(E_WARNING, Failed to call user
+function: %s(), Z_STRVAL_PP(prefix));
+ return;
+ }
+ efree(user_callback_arg);
+
+ if(!Z_BVAL_P(user_callback_retval)){
+
+zend_hash_move_forward_ex(Z_ARRVAL_PP(var_array), pos);
+ continue;
+ }else{
+ smart_str_appendl(final_name, var_name,
+var_name_len);
+ }
+
+ break;
+
default:
if (!var_exists)
smart_str_appendl(final_name, var_name,
var_name_len);
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] delete checked files
Why not start an html form element before u start outputting the tr /s and
td /s of ur table.
Finish it at the end of ur while loop, oh...and include a submit button.
The submit calls either a new script or the same script itself, only using
url query strings to specify a different part of the code.
Each input type=checkbox should be NAMED with the filename of each file
it is representing. Or possibly with a small identifier to differentiate
between the file reference and the input name, say c_ at the front. And
perhaps you ought to remove the file-extention.
So if your directory contained mydoc.doc, the checkbox would be named
c_mydoc
Then u use a while loop exactly the same as in the code u pasted to the
list, but instead of using the filename as a string that you then echo to
the screen, you simply strip off the file extension and add c_ at the
beginning. You will now be referring to each of the chechbox form elements.
Simply while-loop your way through the form elements (each identified by the
file in the directory so you will know when/if an element exists because you
will still be looping through the opendir() command, or not), asking it if
it is checked or not and delete it
if ($c_mydoc){
unlink ($regular_filename_WITH_extension_and_WITHOUT_c_)
}
--
Dave Cranwell
Torchbox Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: (+44) 1608 811 870
mob: (+44) 7760 438 708
http://www.torchbox.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Delete checked files
PHP-DEV is for the development OF PHP, not for developing WITH PHP.
Ask support questions on PHP-GENERAL ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Sander
On 2002.02.25 17:04 Nautilis wrote:
Hi everybody,
I show a list of files that I upload to the user's folder using the
next
code:
$path= ../clients/$user;
$dir = opendir ($root);
while ($archivo = readdir ($dir))
{
$size = filesize($path/$filename);
$size = ($size/1024);
$size = intval($size * 100 ) / 100;
if ($filename!= . $filename!=..)
{
echo trtda
href='$path/$filename'$filename/a/tdtd$size Kb/td/tr;
}
}
I want to add a checkbox in every file i get in the user's folder. My
question is:
Is there any way to use some kind of function to delete selected
files? I am
not sure if i can use javascript to evaluate which is checked and how.
And
after that evaluation, how to call a unlink ($filename) to delete the
files.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Nau
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Delete checked files
Ups! I am very sorry.
As i am a newbie at php i thought, as you suggested, that this was for
developement with php.
Thx alot anyway
- Original Message -
From: Sander Roobol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nautilis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Delete checked files
PHP-DEV is for the development OF PHP, not for developing WITH PHP.
Ask support questions on PHP-GENERAL ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Sander
On 2002.02.25 17:04 Nautilis wrote:
Hi everybody,
I show a list of files that I upload to the user's folder using the
next
code:
$path= ../clients/$user;
$dir = opendir ($root);
while ($archivo = readdir ($dir))
{
$size = filesize($path/$filename);
$size = ($size/1024);
$size = intval($size * 100 ) / 100;
if ($filename!= . $filename!=..)
{
echo trtda
href='$path/$filename'$filename/a/tdtd$size Kb/td/tr;
}
}
I want to add a checkbox in every file i get in the user's folder. My
question is:
Is there any way to use some kind of function to delete selected
files? I am
not sure if i can use javascript to evaluate which is checked and how.
And
after that evaluation, how to call a unlink ($filename) to delete the
files.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Nau
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Gd compile issues with CVS
Hi all, I was bitten by compile failures with latest CVS and filed a bug report (#15697). After investigating the problem, i found that changes in config.m4 were responsible of the problems. from the Changelog: 2002-02-23 Rui Hirokawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] * ext/gd/config.m4: fixed configure error with freetype1. The changes introduced by Rui break the recognition of GD 2.0.1 and Freetype2 at least on SuSE Linux 7.3, leading not only to the infamous GdIOCTX bug but also seem to confuse 'configure' (mcrypt version can't be detected). I'm not an autoconf/automake expert, so I can't say what exactly is wrong here, but people hit by this bug should try to just revert Rui's patch -- everything works fine then...;-... ==revert-gd-patch= --- config.m4 Sat Feb 23 02:36:55 2002 +++ config.m4 Sun Feb 24 14:05:54 2002 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ dnl -dnl $Id: config.m4,v 1.83 2002/02/23 01:36:55 hirokawa Exp $ +dnl $Id: config.m4,v 1.82 2002/01/13 06:25:18 hirokawa Exp $ dnl AC_DEFUN(PHP_GD_JPEG,[ @@ -125,10 +125,6 @@ AC_DEFUN(PHP_GD_FREETYPE2,[ PHP_ARG_WITH(freetype-dir, for freetype(2), [ --with-freetype-dir=DIR GD: Set the path to freetype2 install prefix.]) - - if test $PHP_TTF != no; then -PHP_FREETYPE_DIR=no - fi if test $PHP_FREETYPE_DIR != no; then for i in /usr /usr/local $PHP_FREETYPE_DIR; do === Cheers Michael -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] PHP w/LDAP support crapping out
I am attempting to compile PHP v.4.1.0 with support for Openldap v.1.2.12. Below is my configure line: ./configure \ --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs \ --with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl \ --with-imap-ssl=/usr/local/ssl \ --with-imap=/usr/local/src/imap-2000c \ --with-ldap=/usr/local/openldap-1.2.12um7 \ --with-mcrypt \ --with-mm \ --with-mysql \ --with-xml \ --with-zlib \ --with-gettext \ --enable-inline-optimization \ --enable-track-vars All the individual piece configure, make, and install with nary an error. But when I move to fire up the server, I get: Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/libphp4.so into server: /usr/local/apache/libexec/libphp4.so: undefined symbol: ldap_value_free /usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl restart: httpd could not be started I know this has been covered, but the only solution I found by searching was to add the lib directory to my /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig. I tried that and it's not working. Below is my /etc/ld.so.conf file: /usr/local/openldap-1.2.12um7/lib /usr/local/lib /usr/lib /lib Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. I'm at the limits of my understanding with this. Thanks! -- I have spoken. J. Rashaad JacksonUNIX Systems Administrator 2032 Samuel T. Dana Building(W) 734.615.1422 Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (M) 734.649.6641 http://www.umich.edu/~jrashaad (F) 734.763.8965 msg34541/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[PHP-DEV] Re: Apache 2.0.32 + PHP 4.2-dev = No go on XP
Hello? Anyone else have this problem or what? Jobarr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... OkI REALLY want to use Apache 2 and PHP, but it just won't work. I complied both myself with VC++ 6.0 and I get this error when I try to just to phpinfo() Apache HTTP Server has encountered a problem and needs to close. AppName: apache.exe AppVer: 2.0.32.0 ModName: libhttpd.dll ModVer: 2.0.32.0 Offset: 00016ab8 Sometimes the phpinfo page loads, other times it does not, but Apache never fully crashes, it keeps running so I can keep trying to load the page. I'm running XP and the specific php version is php4-200202211200. I even tried with the latest CVS version of Apache 2.0.33-dev. If I don't load mod_info or mod_status, it seems to stop crashing, but after the first load of the phpinfo page, it takes like 20 seconds to load the next and this is just testing it on my own machine, it isn't live or anything on the internet. Any ideas? I can do any tests needed... -Jobarr -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP-DEV] SAP DB
Yes, As I didn't know that SAPDB = AdabasD I was unaware... As far as I know is is pretty much AdabasD but ist not exactly AdabasD either. Its basically a fork from all I know. The documentation seemed fairly complete when I checked a while back. The interface to it was just not very good though. Best regards, Lukas Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ DybNet Internet Solutions GbR Alt Moabit 89 10559 Berlin Germany Tel. : +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax : +49 30 83 22 50 07 www.dybnet.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] SAP DB
On Monday, 25. February 2002 21:19, Lukas Smith wrote: Yes, As I didn't know that SAPDB = AdabasD I was unaware... As far as I know is is pretty much AdabasD but ist not exactly AdabasD either. Its basically a fork from all I know. Yes, its a fork from version 6.1 Georg -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] SAP DB
SAP DB is just another name for AdabasD from a programmers point of view- Ah, cool. http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.odbc.php Well, yes. In addition to normal ODBC support, the Unified ODBC functions in PHP allow you to access several databases that have borrowed the semantics of the ODBC API to implement their own API. Instead of maintaining multiple database drivers that were all nearly identical, these drivers have been unified into a single set of ODBC functions. so the call interface to AdabasD/SapDB looks like ODBC, but you have direct access to the database using PHP, you don't have to deal with ODBC driver management and all the stuff if you don't want you AHA! Fantastic! as said above: it is all there ... just the documentation could need a little update ... Yes, As I didn't know that SAPDB = AdabasD I was unaware... In any case you have made my day, thank you :) All on bc-dev... hehehehe, + excellent +. and Mike, I'm going to use this. (as I suspect you will as well) _alex -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP w/LDAP support crapping out
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:33:15PM -0500, J. Rashaad Jackson wrote : I am attempting to compile PHP v.4.1.0 with support for Openldap v.1.2.12. Below is my configure line: ./configure \ --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs \ --with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl \ --with-imap-ssl=/usr/local/ssl \ --with-imap=/usr/local/src/imap-2000c \ --with-ldap=/usr/local/openldap-1.2.12um7 \ --with-mcrypt \ --with-mm \ --with-mysql \ --with-xml \ --with-zlib \ --with-gettext \ --enable-inline-optimization \ --enable-track-vars All the individual piece configure, make, and install with nary an error. But when I move to fire up the server, I get: Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/libphp4.so into server: /usr/local/apache/libexec/libphp4.so: undefined symbol: ldap_value_free /usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl restart: httpd could not be started I know this has been covered, but the only solution I found by searching was to add the lib directory to my /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig. I tried that and it's not working. Below is my /etc/ld.so.conf file: /usr/local/openldap-1.2.12um7/lib /usr/local/lib /usr/lib /lib Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. I'm at the limits of my understanding with this. Thanks! Have you double checked your system that no stale libraries are handing around? Try running 'ldd libphp4.so' and see if the proper ldap libraries are used. If this still not works, try build ldap as a module for a start and see if this works. -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
Jim wrote: --with-apache is specific to apache1. you have to use --with-apxs2 to build against apache2. Apxs normally builds DSO versions of php. Under apache, DSO stands for Dynamic Shared Object support, and there are some important differences between dso and static compiles, primarily perhaps performance and administration. Statically linking stuff can significantly reduce administration headaches. Let's say you have a 15 server web farm and want to roll out a new, tested combination of Apache/PHP and some other modules. By statically compiling them in, you can reduce the rollout to pretty much one file, the httpd binary. If the directory it is in changes it is not the end of the world. Parallel installs don't have to worry about asymmetric upgrades of shared libs, etc. On a 15 server farm, a 10% performance win equals a server or two. That is $3000-6000 in capital costs, and then another $2,000 in rackspace/power costs. While benchmarks are notoriously hard to get right, why not try a simple ab domain/hello.php comparing static vs DSO compiles? You might see something like a 40% improvement with the static compile. It's a few seconds of compile time for some potential real world savings. Love to see some better numbers on this of course, but in my experience going the static route results in a measurable performance win. As far as I know httpd2 still allows static modules. - August -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
Sebastian wrote: I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled modules or if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO anyhow? It's the preferred method. Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented somewhere? I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of compile is negligible when looking at something that will be installed for timeframes exceeding a day or two, especially for larger server farms. - August -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
August wrote: Sebastian wrote: I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled modules or if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO anyhow? It's the preferred method. Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented somewhere? In apache document. I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of compile is negligible when looking at something that will be installed for timeframes exceeding a day or two, especially for larger server farms. The benefit of DSO is loading modules without compile whole apache. For instance, I would like to use info or status module when I have problem with my web servers, but I don't want to enable them all the time. -- Yasuo Ohgaki -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
At 09:51 AM 2/26/2002 +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: August wrote: I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of compile is negligible when looking at something that will be installed for timeframes exceeding a day or two, especially for larger server farms. The benefit of DSO is loading modules without compile whole apache. For instance, I would like to use info or status module when I have problem with my web servers, but I don't want to enable them all the time. we (I think august and i think the same, sorry dude if I'm mistaken :) :) ) understand the DSO concept *and* your point. Nonetheless, when you know you're gonna use php extensively, why bother a few more minutes of compilation and lose 40% of performance. Static build is the way to go in those cases. On other situations, i agree DSO is a good way (eg info and status you mentioned). I have in charge today a few million users (large web portal here :) ), and let me tell ya : statically built-in IS the way to go. We have seen major drawbacks with DSO. I'm not really sure why though since the module is loaded into memory at Apache startup BUT it definitely is less performant than when it's built in. (i wouldn't say 40% though but even 10% is huge). I'd really like to try out apache 2 and php but I really can't compile it (see an early mail). I know i've asked twice before but has ANYONE succeeded in compiling apache 2 and php in a STATIC BUILD (not --with-apxs but --with-apache) ? Thanks to answer me (privately if you don't want to bother the list). Later, take care -- Mark Villemade Hosting Services Technical Manager MultiMania / Lycos (int) +33 1 53 27 24 05 -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] code for Alphabetical pager class
i think somebody is working on a pager class. this class alpha could
either extend or be incorporated into a pager class. it is composed of
two functions: _getAlphabet() accepts no arguements and returns an array
of the alphabet, getAlphabetNav ($page,$i) accepts (1)the link reference
page and (2) letter that is current (so as to not link it).
the code below returns an multi-dimentional array of html links with
urls that use the value $i=$char[a-z]:
http://www.example.com/users.php?i=m
example of html returned:
a href='./users.php?i=a'a/a
a href='./users.php?i=b'b/a
a href='./users.php?i=c'c/a
a href='./users.php?i=d'd/a
(...)
for example, in use:
?php
/* get the alphabetical navigation
*/
require(Madmin/Alpha.php);
$a = new Alpha();
$alphNav=$a-getAlphabetNav($PHP_SELF,$i);
/*
* then you can use the alphabetic character to
* do things like sql select statements:
*/
if ($i) {
$query = SELECT user_id, username, email FROM user WHERE username
LIKE '$i%';
}
?
here is the code for the class:
?php
//$Id: Alpha.php,v 1.4 2002/02/26 01:05:40 austin Exp $
class Alpha {
/**
* get an array of alphabet for use inside the class
*/
function _getAlphabet() {
$_alphabet=array(1 = a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,
j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,
s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z);
return $_alphabet;
}
function getAlphabetNav ($page,$i) {
$alphabet=$this-_getAlphabet();
foreach ($alphabet as $key=$val) {
if ($val!=$i||!$i) {
$links .= a href='$page?i=$key'$val/a ;
} else {
$links .= $val ;
}
}
return $links;
unset($links);
}
}
?
comments appreciated :)
austin swinney ___ ___ _
information specialist II /_ / /_ SCZ, CA
Education.Training.Research/__ / / | r r r r r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pirates of programming
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
August [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as I know httpd2 still allows static modules. yes, but the --with-apache option for php4 tries to compile a static version of php4 for apache 1.x. maybe someone will create a --with-apache2 option that allows compiling a static version of php4 for apache 2.x. until that happens, the only way to compile php4 with apache2 is to use --with-apxs2, which compiles php4 as a dso. the fact that --with-apache does not work with apache 2.x is not a bug. the --with-apache option is specific to the sapi module for apache 1.x. the sapi module for apache 2.x is a different beast altogether. (in the meantime, it would be nice if someone made it so that the --with-apxs and --with-apache options errored out if someone tried to use them in conjunction with apache 2.x.) jim -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Simple Apache 1.3 vs 2.0 benchmarks
#include as usual, all normal benchmark disclaimers. This is -dev, so let's assume folks have a grasp of the gap between performance benchmarking and the real world. Before flaming please give credit to folks who are able to use this information in a larger and broader context, while recognizing that few of us have the time to implement fantastic benchmarks. Apache 1.3 with php *statically* compiled in gets 1436 reqs/s Apache 2.0 with php as DSO gets 1114 req/s. Apache 2 performs similarlity to Apache 1.3 with php as a DSO. Compiling statically appears helpful, and currently it is not possible to do so with apache 2. Apache 2 supports static modules generally. # ./bin/ab -c 15 -n 10 /hello.php This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.32 $Revision: 1.87 $ apache-2.0 Server Software:Apache/2.0.32 Server Port:80 Document Path: /hello.php Document Length:12 bytes Time taken for tests: 89.706050 seconds Complete requests: 10 Failed requests:0 Write errors: 0 Requests per second:1114.75 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 0.013 [ms] (mean) Transfer rate: 268.89 [Kbytes/sec] received Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 12 95% 20 # ./bin/ab -c 15 -n 10 /hello.php This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.32 $Revision: 1.87 $ apache-2.0 Server Software:Apache/1.3.23 Document Path: /hello.php Document Length:12 bytes Complete requests: 10 Failed requests:0 Write errors: 0 Requests per second:1436.89 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 0.010 [ms] (mean) Transfer rate: 259.59 [Kbytes/sec] received Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 10 95% 14 -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
Hey Yasuo, Could you give a complete url to the DSO recommendation? Most instructions on creating a high performance version of php recommend static compiles. Thanks... - AZ -Original Message- From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] August wrote: Sebastian wrote: if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO anyhow? It's the preferred method. Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented somewhere? In apache document. I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of compile is negligible when looking at something that will be installed for timeframes exceeding a day or two, especially for larger server farms. The benefit of DSO is loading modules without compile whole apache. For instance, I would like to use info or status module when I have problem with my web servers, but I don't want to enable them all the time. -- Yasuo Ohgaki _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
Jim wrote: the fact that --with-apache does not work with apache 2.x is not a bug. I see the inability to compile a static version of php for apache as the bug. Not too concerned with the semantics of the command. My experience may be abnormal, but for production work, static compiles seem a must. I'll agree with Chand on this one, you'd think the performance hit would only be on server startup, but there appear to be noticeable differences beyond that. Someone should take a look at that DSO recommendation that's been brought up a couple of times and add a note that for production stuff, going static may be worth the extra compile time. - August -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
August wrote: Please give a complete url. The apache dso docs just describe dso. Most instructions on creating a high performance version of php recommend static compiles for good reason. Info and status are not php. They have very different usage patterns (used much less frequently). And I think you'd find the performance difference between apache with status and info and without negligible. I have tested every single apache option with respect to speed and memory bloat, and those two are tiny. - AZ It's just in my memory. (My memory can be _wrong_ though ;) There should be doc/file somewhere that recommeds DSO since it's a most flexible to configure. Recommendatation is recommendation, you don't have to follow if you don't like. Recommendation can be a personal opinion also even if it's explicitly written in a doc ;) -- Yasuo Ohgaki _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today
I have set up dozens of production servers in the past couple of years and not a single one of them is running the static version. If there are issues with the DSO, then file a bug report on that so we can fix it. -Rasmus On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote: Jim wrote: the fact that --with-apache does not work with apache 2.x is not a bug. I see the inability to compile a static version of php for apache as the bug. Not too concerned with the semantics of the command. My experience may be abnormal, but for production work, static compiles seem a must. I'll agree with Chand on this one, you'd think the performance hit would only be on server startup, but there appear to be noticeable differences beyond that. Someone should take a look at that DSO recommendation that's been brought up a couple of times and add a note that for production stuff, going static may be worth the extra compile time. - August -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Simple Apache 1.3 vs 2.0 benchmarks
Uh, but did you benchmark straight cgi's between the two servers? How about straight static pages? Why would you automatically attribute the difference in performance to DSO vs. static issues? It is pretty well known that Apache2 is currently slower than Apache1 for stuff like this because of the added overhead of the bucket brigade implementation and other issues. -Rasmus On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote: #include as usual, all normal benchmark disclaimers. This is -dev, so let's assume folks have a grasp of the gap between performance benchmarking and the real world. Before flaming please give credit to folks who are able to use this information in a larger and broader context, while recognizing that few of us have the time to implement fantastic benchmarks. Apache 1.3 with php *statically* compiled in gets 1436 reqs/s Apache 2.0 with php as DSO gets 1114 req/s. Apache 2 performs similarlity to Apache 1.3 with php as a DSO. Compiling statically appears helpful, and currently it is not possible to do so with apache 2. Apache 2 supports static modules generally. # ./bin/ab -c 15 -n 10 /hello.php This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.32 $Revision: 1.87 $ apache-2.0 Server Software:Apache/2.0.32 Server Port:80 Document Path: /hello.php Document Length:12 bytes Time taken for tests: 89.706050 seconds Complete requests: 10 Failed requests:0 Write errors: 0 Requests per second:1114.75 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 0.013 [ms] (mean) Transfer rate: 268.89 [Kbytes/sec] received Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 12 95% 20 # ./bin/ab -c 15 -n 10 /hello.php This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.32 $Revision: 1.87 $ apache-2.0 Server Software:Apache/1.3.23 Document Path: /hello.php Document Length:12 bytes Complete requests: 10 Failed requests:0 Write errors: 0 Requests per second:1436.89 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 0.010 [ms] (mean) Transfer rate: 259.59 [Kbytes/sec] received Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 10 95% 14 -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP-DEV] Simple Apache 1.3 vs 2.0 benchmarks
Hey Rasmus, Well, I'd done a similar set of benchmarks between DSO and static with apache 1.3.23, which showed the DSO variant getting around 1100 req/s. So it wasn't an automatic assumption, I just noticed that the Apache 2 variant had some similar numbers. Unfortunately, the hardware I've been working with is giving me trouble (aka segfaulting during compiles) but I'll be happy to run some apache 1.3.23 DSO/static numbers when I get things fixed up. I was actually just trying to make the point you make about performance with Apache 2 being similar or slightly worse then Apache 1. There was some discussion along the lines of I need the blazing Apache 2 speed and wanted to show that was unlikely to happen, made more obvious because Apache 2 doesn't support static builds. There was a discussion on slashdot about some of this with some various perspectives: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=28250cid=3035903 Also benchmarked various MPM options, with little noticeable difference. Its's such a narrow workload however I'm not sure it really is meaningful. Also have benchmarked php footprint/speed for all the various options, as well as apache footprint/speed for all the various options. One lesson from that was that enabling or disabling the smaller modules makes little/no footprint/speed differences especially on the apache side. Anyways, hoping to get this box back in shape so I can get some work done. - AZ -Original Message- From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:05 PM To: August Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Simple Apache 1.3 vs 2.0 benchmarks Uh, but did you benchmark straight cgi's between the two servers? How about straight static pages? Why would you automatically attribute the difference in performance to DSO vs. static issues? It is pretty well known that Apache2 is currently slower than Apache1 for stuff like this because of the added overhead of the bucket brigade implementation and other issues. -Rasmus -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP-DEV] Simple Apache 1.3 vs 2.0 benchmarks
Which platform are you on? On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote: Hey Rasmus, Well, I'd done a similar set of benchmarks between DSO and static with apache 1.3.23, which showed the DSO variant getting around 1100 req/s. So it wasn't an automatic assumption, I just noticed that the Apache 2 variant had some similar numbers. Unfortunately, the hardware I've been working with is giving me trouble (aka segfaulting during compiles) but I'll be happy to run some apache 1.3.23 DSO/static numbers when I get things fixed up. I was actually just trying to make the point you make about performance with Apache 2 being similar or slightly worse then Apache 1. There was some discussion along the lines of I need the blazing Apache 2 speed and wanted to show that was unlikely to happen, made more obvious because Apache 2 doesn't support static builds. There was a discussion on slashdot about some of this with some various perspectives: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=28250cid=3035903 Also benchmarked various MPM options, with little noticeable difference. Its's such a narrow workload however I'm not sure it really is meaningful. Also have benchmarked php footprint/speed for all the various options, as well as apache footprint/speed for all the various options. One lesson from that was that enabling or disabling the smaller modules makes little/no footprint/speed differences especially on the apache side. Anyways, hoping to get this box back in shape so I can get some work done. - AZ -Original Message- From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:05 PM To: August Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Simple Apache 1.3 vs 2.0 benchmarks Uh, but did you benchmark straight cgi's between the two servers? How about straight static pages? Why would you automatically attribute the difference in performance to DSO vs. static issues? It is pretty well known that Apache2 is currently slower than Apache1 for stuff like this because of the added overhead of the bucket brigade implementation and other issues. -Rasmus -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Load external modules to PHP programm
Hi, all! I try load extern library. How can I do it : compile with PHP-libraries or at runtime? What I need to do? Olga olga tonkonog entwicklung / development caatoosee search technology gmbh gropiusstr. 9 d - 31137 hildesheim fon +49 (0) 5121-99866 16 fax +49 (0) 5121-99866 01 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.caatoosee.com/cst/ -- get what you want Hinweis: Besuchen Sie uns auf der CeBIT 2002 vom 13.3.- 20.3. in Hannover! Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf unserer Website! -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
