RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Segmentation violation

2003-03-13 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
what is your platform ? > -Original Message- > From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 6:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: Segmentation violation > > > J, I will post an issue, but as far as I can tell the error is very > intermittent

RE: [PHP-DEV] Java support....

2003-01-24 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
> Lot's > of noise on there and something about foo vs. bar ;-). Since its a friday...count me in the "bar" camp. > I'm considering using the integrated Java support within PHP to make I beleive the Java extension is in experimental mode and development on it has ceased. I think they were plann

[PHP-DEV] Possible threading issue in PHP

2003-01-23 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
S/W Environment: HPUX 11.00, Apache 2.0 (worker model) , PHP 4.2.3 This one seems to be a hard to trace problem but easily reproducible. Basically, an Apache thread servicing a PHP request crashes when you access the main page (index.php) of phpMyAdmin. An entry similar to the foll. is seen i

[PHP-DEV] Java Extension

2002-11-06 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
I was wondering what the current status of Java extension is. I know its still marked experimental.. Do the developers think it is reaching stability. It would be great for us to know if there is any clear intentions (if any) as of now to revamp it or change its api ? There has been some demand

[PHP-DEV] GD :: configure bug ??

2002-09-27 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Is this an error in gd's configure ? (after running phpize on the extension) approx line# 1977 : if test "$php_always_shared" = "yes"; then ext_output="yes, shared" ext_shared=yes test "$PHP_XPM_DIR" = "no" && PHP_XPM_DIR=yes ## <-- WHY FORCE NO TO YES ?? fi It seems like its mandat

RE: [PHP-DEV] process in README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS broken?

2002-09-12 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
>phpize gives some warnings: >aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBPATH' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used >aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBRARY' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used >aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBRARY_WITH_PATH' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used >

RE: [PHP-DEV] process in README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS broken?

2002-09-12 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
I dunno the solution to the warnings from phpize, (since i havent figured a way to fix that), But I think they are benign warnings. The error message... "You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal." seems bogus. It would be great if someone here can comment on it. Anycase, you n

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: sockets extension

2002-09-09 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
For the benefit of other users i did a status check on the general situation with extensions: Total extensions bundled with PHP4.2.3 = 94 # of them that are Expermintal = 24 Therefore more than 25% are expermental. Among the experimental. Experimental for 19 months to 2yrs

RE: [PHP-DEV] sockets extension

2002-09-09 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
and benefit no one. --Roshan > -Original Message- > From: Dan Kalowsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:49 PM > To: NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] sockets extension > > > B

RE: [PHP-DEV] sockets extension

2002-09-09 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
> > Between 15 days and 15 months. Looking at the CVS its been 19 months since the EXPERMENTAL file was last modified for sockets. No offense intended but, sometimes people dont seem to like to be asked such "obvious" questions by users. I realize that people in open source are not working for

RE: [PHP-DEV] sockets extension

2002-09-09 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
And exactly how long is it expected to continue to stay EXPERIMENTAL ? --Roshan > -Original Message- > From: Wez Furlong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:31 PM > To: Brian Lalor > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] sockets extension > > > W

RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors !

2002-09-05 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:28 PM > To: NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors ! > > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > > >Hi Jani, > >But

RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors !

2002-09-05 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
2 1:14 PM > To: NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors ! > > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > > >> I've committed possible fix in CVS. So please try that. > > > >Thank

RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors !

2002-09-05 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Jani, >> I've committed possible fix in CVS. So please try that. Thanks. You may also want to consider fixing another problem with configure ... it doesnt support "--with-zlib-dir" option thus requiring a variable "PHP_ZLIB_DIR" to be exported prior to running confgiure. W/o that configure f

RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors !

2002-09-04 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
asmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:10 PM > To: NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors ! > > > > gd.h in the GD library (v 1.8.4) distribution > (

RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors !

2002-09-04 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
!! There is only one gd.h. --Roshan > -Original Message- > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:09 PM > To: NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler e

RE: [PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors !

2002-09-04 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
ettftext_common': gd.c:2800: warning: passing arg 2 of `virtual_filepath' from incompatible pointer type Has anybody got GD working in 4.2.2 ? --Roshan > -Original Message- > From: Markus Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:48 PM &

[PHP-DEV] GD broken ? compiler errors !

2002-09-03 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Is GD extension fundamentally broken as of 4.2.2 ? Configuration: PHP version 4.2.2, OS: HPUX, compiler : gcc 2.9 library versions noted in configure line below.. GD extension fails to build as a self-contained extension, with compiler errors during make. He

RE: [PHP-DEV] about php4.1.0 with apache2.x (httpd-2_0_28)

2001-12-19 Thread NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Brian, could you please clarify what doesnt work ? I have tried php 4.1 (without apxs2) with apache 2.0.28 and didnt run into any problems as such. Since you mentioned .."appear to work fine at first" i am if i didnt notice something. --Roshan > -Original Message- > From: Brian Moon [