I though I saw a mail regarding moving srm extension to php4/ext
repository?
However I might be blind, as I can't find it on cvs.php.net, or the
snapshots.
Regards
- robin
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Yes, back when SAP opensourced SAP DB there was a lot of speculation was
to why they did it. Actuallywe installed it on our test server, but
never actually tested it.
It seems very feature complete and well documented. Using ODBC sucks
(especially with the problems it creates with other RDBMSs),
Hello,
On 25 Feb 2002, Robin Ericsson wrote:
I though I saw a mail regarding moving srm extension to php4/ext
repository?
However I might be blind, as I can't find it on cvs.php.net, or the
snapshots.
You're not blind :), we removed it. There was a too big problem with
compability with
August wrote:
I have a build framework that I use extremely frequently, and I don't
believe much has changed with it. Has the procedure changed for
statically compiling php with apache? I haven't seen any documentation
of it.
I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled
alex black wrote:
hi all,
One of the binarycloud developers just told me to have a look at the SAP OS
database, SAPDB.
SAP DB is just another name for AdabasD from a programmers point of view-
I'm going to test it tomorrow to see if it actually does what it claims, but
this _looks_ like
Ok,
I know ive already posted this but no responded. So I'll do it again.
Currently call_user_function() doesn't call overloaded class methods.
I hacked together a function to get around this. Does anyone want to look at it
and see if it's gunna mess anything up as far as zend execution. if
Casey,
You may wish to try iODBC instead of UnixODBC.
I'd also suggest trying OpenLink's Single-Tier ODBC drivers.
Best regards,
Andrew Hill
Director of Technology Evangelism
OpenLink Software http://www.openlinksw.com
Universal Data Access Data Integration Technology Providers
Where would i find out how to create
the necessary xml docs so my extension
docs would flow into php's website?
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List
Maintaining the documentation
Translating the documentation
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 2002.02.25 15:07 brad lafountain wrote:
Where would i find out how to create
the necessary xml docs so my extension
docs would flow into php's website?
Actually, you're asking this on the wrong mailinglist... use PHP-DOC
for this.
Anyway, have a look at
Hi
Does someone is writing(or plannning to) XML-RPC extension?
I tried Edd Dumbill's code. When trying to send/receive small amount of data - no
problems. Not fast as a light but satisfying -
0.2s.
When I tried to receive big PHP array(100) elements (arrays) the return from the
server was 50k
Hi everybody,
I show a list of files that I upload to the user's folder using the next
code:
$path= ../clients/$user;
$dir = opendir ($root);
while ($archivo = readdir ($dir))
{
$size = filesize($path/$filename);
$size = ($size/1024);
$size
I've added an extra option extract() to have potential variable names passed
to a user defined callback function. If this function then returns true,
it's extracted, if not it's not.
Anyone care to apply/check it?
Eg.:
?php
function extract_callback($varname){
return
Why not start an html form element before u start outputting the tr /s and
td /s of ur table.
Finish it at the end of ur while loop, oh...and include a submit button.
The submit calls either a new script or the same script itself, only using
url query strings to specify a different part of the
PHP-DEV is for the development OF PHP, not for developing WITH PHP.
Ask support questions on PHP-GENERAL ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Sander
On 2002.02.25 17:04 Nautilis wrote:
Hi everybody,
I show a list of files that I upload to the user's folder using the
next
code:
$path=
Ups! I am very sorry.
As i am a newbie at php i thought, as you suggested, that this was for
developement with php.
Thx alot anyway
- Original Message -
From: Sander Roobol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nautilis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:38 PM
Hi all,
I was bitten by compile failures with latest CVS and filed a bug report
(#15697). After investigating the problem, i found that changes in
config.m4 were responsible of the problems.
from the Changelog:
2002-02-23 Rui Hirokawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
* ext/gd/config.m4:
I am attempting to compile PHP v.4.1.0 with support for Openldap v.1.2.12.
Below is my configure line:
./configure \
--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs \
--with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl \
--with-imap-ssl=/usr/local/ssl \
--with-imap=/usr/local/src/imap-2000c \
Hello? Anyone else have this problem or what?
Jobarr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
OkI REALLY want to use Apache 2 and PHP, but it just won't work. I
complied both myself with VC++ 6.0 and I get this error when I try to just
to phpinfo()
Yes, As I didn't know that SAPDB = AdabasD I was unaware...
As far as I know is is pretty much AdabasD but ist not exactly AdabasD
either. Its basically a fork from all I know.
The documentation seemed fairly complete when I checked a while back.
The interface to it was just not very good
On Monday, 25. February 2002 21:19, Lukas Smith wrote:
Yes, As I didn't know that SAPDB = AdabasD I was unaware...
As far as I know is is pretty much AdabasD but ist not exactly AdabasD
either. Its basically a fork from all I know.
Yes, its a fork from version 6.1
Georg
--
PHP
SAP DB is just another name for AdabasD from a programmers point of view-
Ah, cool.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.odbc.php
Well, yes.
In addition to normal ODBC support, the Unified ODBC functions in PHP allow
you to access several databases that have borrowed the semantics of the
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:33:15PM -0500, J. Rashaad Jackson wrote :
I am attempting to compile PHP v.4.1.0 with support for Openldap v.1.2.12.
Below is my configure line:
./configure \
--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs \
--with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl \
Jim wrote:
--with-apache is specific to apache1. you have to use --with-apxs2 to
build against apache2.
Apxs normally builds DSO versions of php. Under apache, DSO stands for
Dynamic Shared Object support, and there are some important differences
between dso and static compiles, primarily
Sebastian wrote:
I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled modules or
if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO
anyhow? It's the preferred method.
Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented
somewhere?
I find DSO useful for
August wrote:
Sebastian wrote:
I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled modules or
if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO
anyhow? It's the preferred method.
Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented
somewhere?
At 09:51 AM 2/26/2002 +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
August wrote:
I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it
makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of compile is
negligible when looking at something that will be installed for
timeframes exceeding a day
i think somebody is working on a pager class. this class alpha could
either extend or be incorporated into a pager class. it is composed of
two functions: _getAlphabet() accepts no arguements and returns an array
of the alphabet, getAlphabetNav ($page,$i) accepts (1)the link reference
page and
August [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know httpd2 still allows static modules.
yes, but the --with-apache option for php4 tries to compile a static
version of php4 for apache 1.x.
maybe someone will create a --with-apache2 option that allows compiling
a static version of php4 for apache
#include as usual, all normal benchmark disclaimers.
This is -dev, so let's assume folks have a grasp of the gap between
performance benchmarking and the real world. Before flaming please give
credit to folks who are able to use this information in a larger and
broader context, while
Hey Yasuo,
Could you give a complete url to the DSO recommendation? Most
instructions on creating a high performance version of php recommend
static compiles.
Thanks...
- AZ
-Original Message-
From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
August wrote:
Sebastian wrote:
if PHP's
Jim wrote:
the fact that --with-apache does not work with apache 2.x is not a bug.
I see the inability to compile a static version of php for apache as the
bug. Not too concerned with the semantics of the command. My experience
may be abnormal, but for production work, static compiles seem a
August wrote:
Please give a complete url. The apache dso docs just describe dso. Most
instructions on creating a high performance version of php recommend
static compiles for good reason.
Info and status are not php. They have very different usage patterns
(used much less frequently).
I have set up dozens of production servers in the past couple of years and
not a single one of them is running the static version. If there are
issues with the DSO, then file a bug report on that so we can fix it.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote:
Jim wrote:
the fact that
Uh, but did you benchmark straight cgi's between the two servers? How
about straight static pages?
Why would you automatically attribute the difference in performance to DSO
vs. static issues? It is pretty well known that Apache2 is currently
slower than Apache1 for stuff like this because of
Hey Rasmus,
Well, I'd done a similar set of benchmarks between DSO and static with
apache 1.3.23, which showed the DSO variant getting around 1100 req/s.
So it wasn't an automatic assumption, I just noticed that the Apache 2
variant had some similar numbers. Unfortunately, the hardware I've been
Which platform are you on?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote:
Hey Rasmus,
Well, I'd done a similar set of benchmarks between DSO and static with
apache 1.3.23, which showed the DSO variant getting around 1100 req/s.
So it wasn't an automatic assumption, I just noticed that the Apache 2
Hi, all!
I try load extern library. How can I do it : compile with PHP-libraries
or at runtime? What I need to do?
Olga
olga tonkonog
entwicklung / development
caatoosee search technology gmbh
gropiusstr. 9
d - 31137 hildesheim
fon +49 (0) 5121-99866 16
fax +49 (0) 5121-99866 01
mailto:
38 matches
Mail list logo
