php-general Digest 12 Mar 2008 08:28:07 - Issue 5343
Topics (messages 271313 through 271332):
Re: link with database
271313 by: Shawn McKenzie
271314 by: Shawn McKenzie
Know a JS list serve
271315 by: Skip Evans
271318 by: Greg Donald
Re: Whats faster?
Quoting Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I'm searching some file upload progress bar code.
But no good result was found. :(
So is there anybody please be kind enough to show some code here?
Great thanks.
--
Regard,
Shelley (http://phparch.cn)
--
PHP General Mailing List
I haven't' tried this yet ... so I would appreciate your feedback.
-Original Message-
From: Thijs Lensselink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:28 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Ajax progress bar
Quoting Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
Quoting Mr Webber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I haven't' tried this yet ... so I would appreciate your feedback.
-Original Message-
From: Thijs Lensselink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:28 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Ajax progress bar
Hi Folks,
I am thinking of putting together a class to handle passing parameters
to a class. Basically when you define a class you would define your
class to extend the parameter class.
The parameter class would be JSON compliant so in the end when you call
a class it you could pass the
11 mar 2008 kl. 22.39 skrev Skip Evans:
Hey all,
I've been Googling trying to find a JavaScript list serve to post a
question to, but have been, embarrassingly, unable to find one.
Anyone on one they'd recommend or know of one?
Thanks
*sigh*
Evolt has a rather good list (not too much
Thijs Lensselink 写道:
Quoting Mr Webber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I haven't' tried this yet ... so I would appreciate your feedback.
-Original Message-
From: Thijs Lensselink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:28 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP
Quoting Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thijs Lensselink 写道:
Quoting Mr Webber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I haven't' tried this yet ... so I would appreciate your feedback.
-Original Message-
From: Thijs Lensselink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:28 AM
To:
Quoting mathieu leddet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I have a simple question : how can I ensure that 2 files are identical ?
How about this ?
8--
function files_identical($path1, $path2) {
return (file_get_contents($path1) ==
mathieu leddet wrote:
I have a simple question : how can I ensure that 2 files are identical ?
How about this ?
8--
function files_identical($path1, $path2) {
return (file_get_contents($path1) ==
mathieu leddet wrote:
Hi all,
I have a simple question : how can I ensure that 2 files are identical ?
How about this ?
8--
function files_identical($path1, $path2) {
return (file_get_contents($path1) ==
-Original Message-
From: mathieu leddet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 March 2008 11:04
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Comparing files
Hi all,
I have a simple question : how can I ensure that 2 files are identical ?
How about this ?
Hi all,
I have a simple question : how can I ensure that 2 files are identical ?
How about this ?
8--
function files_identical($path1, $path2) {
return (file_get_contents($path1) == file_get_contents($path2));
}
Yes!
Thanks a lot, md5_file suits perfectly well my needs.
I've read that 'exec'ing the md5 command is faster... I'll see when performance
on large files will become an issue.
Thanks again,
--
Mathieu
-Message d'origine-
De : Thijs Lensselink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé :
mathieu leddet wrote:
Yes!
Thanks a lot, md5_file suits perfectly well my needs.
I've read that 'exec'ing the md5 command is faster... I'll see when
performance on large files will become an issue.
Doing a diff on the files would make absolutely certain - an md5
checksum is not.
/Per
-Original Message-
From: Edward Kay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:13 AM
To: mathieu leddet; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Comparing files
-Original Message-
From: mathieu leddet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 March
Hi,
I am learning PHP, I am trying to set a simple cookie:
html
head
titleCookies/title
/head
body
?php setcookie('test', 45, time()+(60*60*24*7)); ?
/body
/html
Firefox is returning this error:
body
?php setcookie('test', 45, time()+(60*60*24*7)); ?
from the doc:
Cookies are part of the HTTP header, so setcookie() must be called before
any output is sent to the browser. This is the same limitation that header()
has.
http://ca.php.net/cookies
-
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Tim Daff wrote:
Hi,
I am learning PHP, I am trying to set a simple cookie:
html
head
titleCookies/title
/head
body
?php setcookie('test', 45,
time()+(60*60*24*7)); ?
/body
/html
Firefox is returning
Thank's for your help Zareef, Hiep, Shiplu and Jean-Christophe
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mar 12, 2008, at 4:14 AM, Frank Arensmeier wrote:
11 mar 2008 kl. 22.39 skrev Skip Evans:
Hey all,
I've been Googling trying to find a JavaScript list serve to post a
question to, but have been, embarrassingly, unable to find one.
Anyone on one they'd recommend or know of one?
-Original Message-
From: Andrés Robinet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 March 2008 12:33
To: 'Edward Kay'; 'mathieu leddet'; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Comparing files
-Original Message-
From: Edward Kay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Firefox is returning this error:
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by
(output started at /Users/Daff/Sites/php_sandbox/cookies.php:7) in
/Users/Daff/Sites/php_sandbox/cookies.php on line 7
You must use set cookie() before you send any output to the browser,
Tim Daff wrote:
Hi,
I am learning PHP, I am trying to set a simple cookie:
html
head
titleCookies/title
/head
body
?php setcookie('test', 45, time()+(60*60*24*7)); ?
/body
/html
Firefox is returning this error:
Warning: Cannot modify header
Quoting Andrés Robinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-Original Message-
From: Edward Kay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:13 AM
To: mathieu leddet; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Comparing files
-Original Message-
From: mathieu leddet
Even you cant put a space before ?php tag.
the following code will throw the same error.
| ?php
| setcookie();
| ?
Because I prepend a space for each line
But this will be okay
|?php
| setcookie();
| ?
This is a very common mistake and very very hard to find.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:53 AM,
Wolf wrote:
Tim Daff wrote:
Hi,
I am learning PHP, I am trying to set a simple cookie:
html
head
titleCookies/title
/head
body
?php setcookie('test', 45, time()+(60*60*24*7)); ?
/body
/html
Firefox is returning this error:
Warning: Cannot
As a dirty trick you can put following line on the top of your script,
it will work
ob_start();
But you should try to know why it is not working, and what exactly
ob_start will impact your application and What is the thing called
Output Buffering.
Zareef Ahmed
On 3/12/08, Hiep Nguyen [EMAIL
Hello all,
I'm wondering what's wrong with the use of __autoload(), since I see that
projects like the Zend Framework don't use it and prefer to require_once
each required file.
Thanks in advance.
--
Gustavo Narea.
http://gustavonarea.net/
Get GNU/Linux! http://www.getgnulinux.org/
--
PHP
Hi,
I want to know what is the best solution for handling errors. After reading
some documents dealing with the subject, i have three options:
* Using a class for error handling
* Using PEAR error object
* Using try and catch exceptions
The error handling i want to implement will be done in a
I'm wondering what's wrong with the use of __autoload(), since I see that
projects like the Zend Framework don't use it and prefer to require_once
each required file.
Things that happen without you explicitly causing them (ie require() et
al) can lead to confusion.
For example a junior
Hi,
i'm playing a little bit with the mail function from PHP 5.2.4 and email
headers.
here is a snippet of my code:
$headers = 'From: '.$email. .$fromname.
\r\n.'Reply-To:'.$email.\r\n.'X-Mailer: PHP/' . phpversion();
if (mail($to, $subject, $body,$headers))
{
...
}
where:
$fromname =
It Maq wrote:
I want to know what is the best solution for handling errors. After
reading some documents dealing with the subject, i have three
options:
* Using a class for error handling
No point IMO when you could use either the below two.
* Using PEAR error object
I wouldn't advise
I want to know what is the best solution for handling errors. After reading
some
documents dealing with the subject, i have three options:
* Using a class for error handling
* Using PEAR error object
* Using try and catch exceptions
The error handling i want to implement will be done
On Mar 12, 2008, at 5:02 AM, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
Thijs Lensselink 写道:
How do you pronounce your name?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Yes you are right i can use trigger_error that will use the function that
handles errors from my class.
Thanks
- Original Message
From: Christoph Boget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: It Maq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 10:31:07 AM
Subject: Re:
2008. 03. 12, szerda keltezéssel 07.18-kor It Maq ezt írta:
Hi,
I want to know what is the best solution for handling errors. After reading
some documents dealing with the subject, i have three options:
* Using a class for error handling
* Using PEAR error object
* Using try and catch
I mean using calling trigger_error from the catch{}
Yes you are right i can use trigger_error that will use the
function that handles errors from my class.
Thanks
- Original Message
From: Christoph Boget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: It Maq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Quoting Philip Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 5:02 AM, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
Thijs Lensselink 写道:
How do you pronounce your name?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Well.. how to explain this one...
Because then it screws up message formatting.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't top-post! ;-P
--
/Dan
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
? while(1) { $me = $mind--; sleep(86400); } ?
--
/Dan
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix
Especially in the archives.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because then it screws up message formatting.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't top-post! ;-P
--
/Dan
Please don't top-post! ;-P
--
/Dan
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
? while(1) { $me = $mind--; sleep(86400); } ?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Alain Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i'm playing a little bit with the mail function from PHP 5.2.4 and email
headers.
here is a snippet of my code:
$headers = 'From: '.$email. .$fromname.
\r\n.'Reply-To:'.$email.\r\n.'X-Mailer: PHP/' .
Lamonte H wrote:
After a while of studying different softwares, I've still been getting
confused on how to make a timezone management script to display time in
different time zones. Like right now im in -0600 CST GMT, how would I
create a script that would work on any server that would allow
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lamonte H wrote:
After a while of studying different softwares, I've still been getting
confused on how to make a timezone management script to display time in
different time zones. Like right now im in -0600 CST
I call TROLL on Dan! :) I top post for what I consider to be legitmate
reasons just like you bottom post for reasons you consider to be legitmate.
Can't we all just get along?
How about something OT that we can argue about... driving on the left side
of the road versus the right side.
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
Quoting Philip Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 5:02 AM, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
Thijs Lensselink 写道:
How do you pronounce your name?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:01 AM, TG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about something OT that we can argue about... driving on the left side
of the road versus the right side. How does your country compare?
Here in Pennsyltucky, a lot of people drive on the left, despite
the fact that the
2008/3/12, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You have the From: header parameters reversed. Try this:
?
$headers = From: .$fromname. .$email.\r\n;
$headers .= Reply-To: .$email.\r\n;
$headers .= X-Mailer: PHP/.phpversion().\r\n;
/*
*/
?
you can add these headers:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Philip Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
Quoting Philip Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How do you pronounce your name?
Well.. how to explain this one...
thijs : T + [ice]
Which is
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:01 AM, TG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about something OT that we can argue about... driving on the left side
of the road versus the right side. How does your country compare?
Here in Pennsyltucky, a lot of people drive on the
On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:01 AM, TG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How about something OT that we can argue about... driving on the
left side
of the road versus the right side. How does your country compare?
Here in Pennsyltucky, a lot
Quoting Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Philip Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
Quoting Philip Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How do you pronounce your name?
Well.. how to explain this one...
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Especially in the archives.
Or worse yet, when someone else bottom-posts correctly and doesn't
clip the remaining conversation.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:01 AM, TG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How about something OT that we can argue about... driving on the
left side
of the road versus the right side. How does
On 3/12/08, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering what's wrong with the use of __autoload(), since I see that
projects like the Zend Framework don't use it and prefer to require_once
each required file.
Things that happen without you explicitly causing them (ie require()
ok i will try... what about UTF-8 to ensure unicode ?
my website and especially the form which will send this email, will be
filled in by several nationalities... spanish, english, french, slovak,
german,,...
so isn't it easier to set up utf-8 ?
A.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:11 PM, spacemarc
ok i will try... what about UTF-8 to ensure unicode ?
my website and especially the form which will send this email, will be
filled in by several nationalities... spanish, english, french, slovak,
german,,...
so isn't it easier to set up utf-8 ?
A.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:11 PM, spacemarc
On 3/10/08, Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Watch throwing that blame around there Greg, you get to thank the
democrats for NAFTA and the hurting the heartlands
No matter where we draw the borders or put the roads and highways,
it's still just the one planet, with the same finite resources we
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 10:33 -0500, Greg Donald wrote:
On 3/12/08, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering what's wrong with the use of __autoload(), since I see that
projects like the Zend Framework don't use it and prefer to require_once
each required file.
Things
ok, so this is what i got and it is still remaining... :-(
Received: from serdev ([127.0.0.1]) by home.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed,
12 Mar 2008 16:40:18 +0100
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:40:18 +0100
Subject: subject 3
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: raf, news [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
Daniel Brown wrote:
Here in Pennsyltucky, a lot of people drive on the left, despite
the fact that the whole US is supposed to drive on the right. It
usually doesn't turn out very good. .:shakes head, solemnly:.
Don't worry Dan, evolution will sort that out eventually.
/Per Jessen,
I don't know... but...
-Original Message-
From: Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:30 AM
To: Jason Pruim
Cc: TG; Daniel Brown; PHP General List
Subject: Re: [PHP] A Quick Reminder
Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 12, 2008,
RFC1855/FYI28:
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc1855.txt
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/fyi/fyi28.txt
Found via the RFC-Editor archive search:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/
Ok, so this RFC discourages top posting, but it was also written 13 years ago
when Usenet and other threaded/flat
On 3/12/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then you'd end up with something like Ruby on Rails... and we all
know about Ruby on Rails *VOMIT*.
You clearly don't know much about it or else you wouldn't be bashing
it. Period. Just admit the fact that you're resistant to learn
For example a junior developer who doesn't know of its existence and is
new to a job is less likely to admit ignorance and ask how a class is
being defined when __autoload() is being used.
That's a the dumbest reason I've ever heard to not use a given language feature.
It's a perfectly
- Original Message -
From: Andrés Robinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Wolf' [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Jason Pruim' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'TG' [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Daniel Brown' [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'PHP
General List' php-general@lists.php.net
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:58:26 -0400
How
On 3/12/08, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a perfectly viable business reason.
No it's not. I guess you need a business scenario to wrap your head
around the idiocy.
Here you go:
Imagine at Blizzard one morning, Hey guys, we're not going to be able
to use function pointers on the
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Gustavo Narea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I'm wondering what's wrong with the use of __autoload(), since I see that
projects like the Zend Framework don't use it and prefer to require_once
each required file.
Thanks in advance.
--
Gustavo
It's a perfectly viable business reason.
No it's not. I guess you need a business scenario to wrap your head
around the idiocy.
Here you go:
Imagine at Blizzard one morning, Hey guys, we're not going to be able
to use function pointers on the new Diablo III like we had planned to
do, the new
2008. 03. 12, szerda keltezéssel 11.12-kor Greg Donald ezt írta:
On 3/12/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then you'd end up with something like Ruby on Rails... and we all
know about Ruby on Rails *VOMIT*.
You clearly don't know much about it or else you wouldn't be
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:01 AM, TG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How about something OT that we can argue about... driving on the
left side
of the road versus the right side. How does your country compare?
Here in
On 3/12/08, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not quite the situation. Finding good developers isn't easy, so
lots of companies will go for acceptable ones, who are less likely to
know of __autoloads existence. Hence, using __autoload is unwise.
A lesser developer should be paid
On 3/12/08, Zoltán Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I strongly think that Ruby as a
language just plain sucks ;)
And exactly how many projects do you have under your belt to allow you
to develop this opinion? What's the url to any one of them?
Unlike you I actually have thousands of lines
On 3/12/08, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No it's not. It's not like require_once() is a hassle to type/use
anyhow. Things like editor macros and templates help out enormously and
by using them over __auto load you (a business) could save yourself a
lot of time and hence money.
On 3/12/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagine at Blizzard one morning, Hey guys, we're not going to be able
to use function pointers on the new Diablo III like we had planned to
do, the new hires down the hall don't understand them very well so
just don't use them, OK?
2008. 03. 12, szerda keltezéssel 12.12-kor Greg Donald ezt írta:
On 3/12/08, Zoltán Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I strongly think that Ruby as a
language just plain sucks ;)
And exactly how many projects do you have under your belt to allow you
to develop this opinion? What's the
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 11:12 -0500, Greg Donald wrote:
On 3/12/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then you'd end up with something like Ruby on Rails... and we all
know about Ruby on Rails *VOMIT*.
You clearly don't know much about it or else you wouldn't be bashing
it.
Greg Donald wrote:
On 3/12/08, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not quite the situation. Finding good developers isn't easy, so
lots of companies will go for acceptable ones, who are less likely to
know of __autoloads existence. Hence, using __autoload is unwise.
A lesser
Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Donald wrote:
On 3/12/08, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not quite the situation. Finding good developers isn't easy, so
lots of companies will go for acceptable ones, who are less likely to
know of __autoloads existence.
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 11:26 -0500, Greg Donald wrote:
On 3/12/08, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a perfectly viable business reason.
No it's not. I guess you need a business scenario to wrap your head
around the idiocy.
Here you go:
Imagine at Blizzard one morning, Hey
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 18:21 +0100, Zoltán Németh wrote:
2008. 03. 12, szerda keltezéssel 12.12-kor Greg Donald ezt írta:
On 3/12/08, Zoltán Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I strongly think that Ruby as a
language just plain sucks ;)
And exactly how many projects do you have
On 12 Mar 2008, at 17:31, Wolf wrote:
Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Donald wrote:
You're
gonna restrict the entire development team from using a given
feature
just because you don't want to invest 20 minutes in getting your
newbie developer up to spead? That's pure
On 3/12/08, Zoltán Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, I admit I don't have experience with Ruby but I have experience with
php. and I don't have experience with Ruby because I read some manuals
and example codes and whatnot and I just could not get to like it at
all.
That's a lot
Matty Sarro wrote:
Yeah, I'm working on this with the hopes of it turning into a full module
for a larger project I'm working on... but I'm still a bit of a noob :)
Thanks for the assistance guys!
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are going to follow Daniel's example, since you could potentially be
working with more then one server on any given order, you might want to look
at
using a multi-dimensional array to store your values in.
An
So, I use a Mac to develop with. I used to host Zend Core on my box,
until I switched to the MAMP PRO framework.
Unfortunately somewhere in between, this lovely issue started occuring
with my CLI binary of PHP:
foo:~ sf$ php -l
dyld: NSLinkModule() error
dyld: Symbol not found: _zend_extensions
2008. 03. 12, szerda keltezéssel 13.27-kor Greg Donald ezt írta:
On 3/12/08, Zoltán Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, I admit I don't have experience with Ruby but I have experience with
php. and I don't have experience with Ruby because I read some manuals
and example codes and whatnot
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:51 PM
To: Zoltán Németh
Cc: Greg Donald; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] What's wrong the __autoload()?
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 18:21 +0100, Zoltán Németh wrote:
Anyone know any PHP Developers who are looking for employment
-Original Message-
From: Andrés Robinet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 2:53 PM
To: 'Robert Cummings'; 'Zoltán Németh'
Cc: 'Greg Donald'; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] What's wrong the
2008. 03. 12, szerda keltezéssel 15.07-kor Stephane Ulysse ezt írta:
Anyone know any PHP Developers who are looking for employment
don't hijack other people's threads, start your own if you want to ask
anything.
and job offers should contain some information about the job and the
employer, and
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Andrés Robinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think __autoload would make much more sense if it worked like an event
registration feature. Such as:
function myAutoloadCallback($className) {
if ($className == 'ShakeItBaby') {
require_once
On 3/12/08, Zoltán Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't really think of a
case where I would want to modify the class definition of an
instantiated object
You can't very well think to walk if you don't have legs.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 14:09 -0500, Greg Donald wrote:
On 3/12/08, Zoltán Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't really think of a
case where I would want to modify the class definition of an
instantiated object
You can't very well think to walk if you don't have legs.
You make it
2008. 03. 12, szerda keltezéssel 15.20-kor Robert Cummings ezt írta:
Even JavaScript has it.
oh yes, I could have thought of that. in JS you can assign a function to
a property or variable at runtime, even I did something similar, when I
assign the action functions of the buttons of a modal
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Zoltán Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2008. 03. 12, szerda keltezéssel 15.20-kor Robert Cummings ezt írta:
Even JavaScript has it.
oh yes, I could have thought of that. in JS you can assign a function to
a property or variable at runtime, even I did
On 3/12/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You make it sound like this stuff is new or something.
Obviously to some it is. Just in this thread we had a person claim to
only know PHP, C, and Java, none of which have any functional language
capabilities built in.
Lisp and other
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Nobbe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:08 PM
To: Andrés Robinet
Cc: Robert Cummings; Zoltán Németh; Greg Donald; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] What's wrong the __autoload()?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:53 PM,
Greg Donald wrote:
Here, let me dumb-it-down a bit:
PHP doesn't have much in the way of meta-programming capabilities.
Therefore one would not find it a natural thought to do much
meta-programming in PHP, unless one already knew of a language where
such support exists.
A different example
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lisp and other
functional languages have had it for decades. Even JavaScript has it.
I'm sorry, I lost context, what missing PHP language feature are you
referring to as it?
functional capabilities, in particular the
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
