On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 06:11:17 +0800
Jason Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2004 05:37, Andre Dubuc wrote:
[...]
Seems to me much easier to scan the Subject, see how it's
developing by reading the reply on the top, rather than
have to wade through even snipped old
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 04:01:47 +0300
Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My email client (Outlook Express) puts a lot of information
at the top of the message automaticly, like:
The signature,
--- original message ---
The From line
- The to line
- The date line
- The subject
Hi Jason,
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:42:09 -0700
Jason Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are we still on top posting.. shessh. i only top post cuase
im lazy...
Maybe we should talk about one-liners next time...
Anyway, I'm sure many people will appreciate it if you trim
your posts.
Thanks!
--
- Edwin - wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 06:11:17 +0800
Jason Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2004 05:37, Andre Dubuc wrote:
[...]
Seems to me much easier to scan the Subject, see how it's
developing by reading the reply on the top, rather than
have to wade through even snipped
Hi,
Happy top posting,
Have fun driving on the wrong side of the road.
Hey that can be fun! Especially in crowded downtown areas. It's a
real challenge!
-Dan Joseph
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 10:02:23 +0800, Jason Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I really shouldn't be indulging you as it's pretty obvious you're only
here
for a vigorous debate (that's my euphemism for an argument - the not so
nice
meaning of argument).
The OP asked for the pros and cons of top
Top posting
Whats that?
hehehe
--- -{ Rene Brehmer }- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Most mail programs have their default settings set
for top posting ...
while most news clients are set for bottom posting
which way is the
most preferable depends on what's most useful for
your reply
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 5:02 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] List Etiquette
On Sunday 19 September 2004 07:52, Robert Cummings wrote:
But definitely there's not global consensus.
I really shouldn't be indulging you as it's pretty obvious you're only here
On Sunday 19 September 2004 19:36, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
I have a very strong reason for top posting and a very strong one for not
agreeing too much bottom posting at all, and this is the fact that I am
blind and if I need to read a bottom post, I need to read again and again
the whole
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
I have a very strong reason for top posting and a very strong one for not
agreeing too much bottom posting at all, and this is the fact that I am
blind and if I need to read a bottom post, I need to read again and again
the whole original message, even though most of
Hi,
From: John Nichel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do the words get smaller at the bottom? Having to scroll thru line
after line of message doesn't deal with top vs. bottom posting...that
stems from people not trimming non-releative parts out of the message.
---
The rules should be made to make the
* Thus wrote Octavian Rasnita:
Hi,
I have a very strong reason for top posting and a very strong one for not
agreeing too much bottom posting at all, and this is the fact that I am
blind and if I need to read a bottom post, I need to read again and again
the whole original message, even
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
The rules should be made to make the reading process easier for the readers
and the top posting versus bottom posting has nothing to do with the
trimming of the messages.
It is much easier to trim a message when top posting, just as I explained
you.
Easier for reading?
On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 14:49, John Nichel wrote:
Check the headers of this email. I'm using a Windows box right now, and
my cursor was automatically at the end when I clicked reply. Again,
it's laziness if one doesn't want to configure their client to put the
cursor at the end, or to
I think it might be best to let this topic die. The original question did
not seem to be an attempt to start a debate but rather to hear why
experienced users dislike top posting. I think I gave such reasons in my
initial reply, so there's no longer a question that needs to be answered.
This is
At 16:57 19-09-2004, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
From: John Nichel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do the words get smaller at the bottom? Having to scroll thru line
after line of message doesn't deal with top vs. bottom posting...that
stems from people not trimming non-releative parts out of the message.
---
Teddy
- Original Message -
From: -{ Rene Brehmer }- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] List Etiquette
At 16:57 19-09-2004, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
From: John Nichel [EMAIL
From: Chris Shiflett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is like arguing that people choose to use IE instead of Firefox.
Surely the flaws of this argument are obvious. For people who bother to
make a choice, Firefox is a clear winner. The same is true for formatted
email. People (who care) tend to agree on a
From: John Nichel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Easier for reading? Yes, you're right. Do you read a book from the
bottom of the page up? Trimming a message is easier if you top post?
That's pretty weak. Follow a top posted thread, you'll see that most
top posters just leave everything in there,
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
snip
In other words it's easier for you to reach your Delete key when you top
post than when you bottom post ???
--
Ok, I have bottom posted, and have trimmed the end of the message. But this
was a little text only, while the header of this message is still there, and
it is
Hi,
After googling 'Web Etiquette, Top Posting', I still am puzzled why some
people on this list insist that top posting is bad form, rather than personal
preference. The arguments seem to be balanced on either side.
Checking the list's archives, I noticed that those who object to top posting
--- Andre Dubuc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After googling 'Web Etiquette, Top Posting', I still am puzzled
why some people on this list insist that top posting is bad form,
rather than personal preference.
I don't think these two things are mutually exclusive.
Yes, there is a difference between
On Sunday 19 September 2004 05:37, Andre Dubuc wrote:
After googling 'Web Etiquette, Top Posting', I still am puzzled why some
people on this list insist that top posting is bad form, rather than
personal preference. The arguments seem to be balanced on either side.
- Top posting means one
*RUH ROH* Better watch out, top posting is an extremely unpopular
discussion. Some members of the list will attempt to lambaste you and
tell you that because the rules are written, then they must be the final
word. Feel free to post however you please, while the dogs might bark
loudly, they are at
On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 18:11, Jason Wong wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2004 05:37, Andre Dubuc wrote:
After googling 'Web Etiquette, Top Posting', I still am puzzled why some
people on this list insist that top posting is bad form, rather than
personal preference. The arguments seem to be
On Sunday 19 September 2004 06:33, Robert Cummings wrote:
[snip]
Happy top posting,
Have fun driving on the wrong side of the road.
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates - www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Systems Integrators
* Web Design Hosting * Internet Intranet Applications
On Sunday 19 September 2004 06:46, Robert Cummings wrote:
I think the argument was top posting versus bottom posting. Not top
posting versus interlacing. If you have no need to reply point to point
then there is no reason I can see why top posting is unsuitable.
I think you're splitting hair
OK, Jason. I'm throughly confused. You say:
Top posting means one cannot reply point by point like I'm doing here.
then you state:
Wouldn't you agree that it's easier to read something point by point
whereby you can easily see the context, instead of reading a sentence at the
top of the post
On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 18:46, Jason Wong wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2004 06:33, Robert Cummings wrote:
[snip]
Happy top posting,
Have fun driving on the wrong side of the road.
What side is that? Doesn't it depend on national preference?
Cheers,
Rob.
--
On Sunday 19 September 2004 07:40, Robert Cummings wrote:
Have fun driving on the wrong side of the road.
What side is that? Doesn't it depend on national preference?
Not personal preference for certain.
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates - www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Systems
On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 19:42, Jason Wong wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2004 07:40, Robert Cummings wrote:
Have fun driving on the wrong side of the road.
What side is that? Doesn't it depend on national preference?
Not personal preference for certain.
But definitely there's not global
On Sunday 19 September 2004 07:52, Robert Cummings wrote:
But definitely there's not global consensus.
I really shouldn't be indulging you as it's pretty obvious you're only here
for a vigorous debate (that's my euphemism for an argument - the not so nice
meaning of argument).
The OP asked
Most mail programs have their default settings set for top posting ...
while most news clients are set for bottom posting which way is the
most preferable depends on what's most useful for your reply ... but those
that enjoy mixing top and bottom posting are the daft ones ... once a
At 01:40 19-09-2004, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 18:46, Jason Wong wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2004 06:33, Robert Cummings wrote:
[snip]
Happy top posting,
Have fun driving on the wrong side of the road.
What side is that? Doesn't it depend on national preference?
When I
PHP Warning: Missing forest, too many trees.
Lots of you are good coders, I've seen you devote immense time and
enegry to crafting informative and helpful posts for years, let's just
move on and read messages using incredibly normal skills like short-term
memory and index finger dexterity for your
On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 22:02, Jason Wong wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2004 07:52, Robert Cummings wrote:
But definitely there's not global consensus.
I really shouldn't be indulging you as it's pretty obvious you're only here
for a vigorous debate (that's my euphemism for an argument -
-Original Message-
What side is that? Doesn't it depend on national preference?
When I overtake others, I usually take to the other lane ... is that the
wrong side, or the right side of the road, for what I'm doing ?
Depends on your perspective :P hehe
-Ed
--
PHP General Mailing
John Nichel wrote:
Is the list about two hours behind in delivering email today for
everyone, or is it just me? Of course, if it is just me, I'll have to
wait two hours to find out. ;)
The servers are probably clogged wiht mysql questions and flames at
people who point out that mysql is off
raditha dissanayake wrote:
John Nichel wrote:
Is the list about two hours behind in delivering email today for
everyone, or is it just me? Of course, if it is just me, I'll have to
wait two hours to find out. ;)
The servers are probably clogged wiht mysql questions and flames at
people who
Hi
I wish to know how I can list my email user I used imap to control the individual
mailbox information but i need to adminitratiton propurse list all the user but i cant
find a function to do this
On Friday 03 September 2004 22:56, Jesus wrote:
I wish to know how I can list my email user I used imap to control the
individual mailbox information but i need to adminitratiton propurse list
all the user but i cant find a function to do this
Because there are no generic methods to get the
Is the list about two hours behind in delivering email today for
everyone, or is it just me? Of course, if it is just me, I'll have to
wait two hours to find out. ;)
--
John C. Nichel
ÜberGeek
KegWorks.com
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
Hi need some clue about of how a can get a list of the all the user in may server I
use the imap functions to work with the mailboxes but in some point I need show up a
list of the all the user but I cant find a function to get all the user
thank for any help
* Thus wrote John Nichel:
Is the list about two hours behind in delivering email today for
everyone, or is it just me? Of course, if it is just me, I'll have to
wait two hours to find out. ;)
very slow.
Curt
--
The above comments may offend you. flame at will.
--
PHP General Mailing
Why not just shell it out?
?php
$users = passthru('ls /var/spool/mail');
echo $users;
?
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Jesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 11:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] List of Users
Hi need some clue about
Morning...
Does anyone know of a site that or resource available where I could pull a
list of ALL UK cities and towns for an option list...?
I started out with 100+, then expanded this list to over 200 but still get
complaints that certain towns are not listed.
--
-
Why does this fail when using an array element, but using a variable will
work? Why should PHP care what the variable is I'm trying to store into?
list($bar['CompanyCode'], $CompanyDB) = mysql_fetch_row($sth);
Wouldn't it be easier to simply do:
$result = mysql_fetch_row($sth);
And then
Linux. PHP5.
Why does this fail when using an array element, but using a variable will
work? Why should PHP care what the variable is I'm trying to store into?
list($bar['CompanyCode'], $CompanyDB) = mysql_fetch_row($sth);
But this works:
list($foo, $CompanyDB) = SQL_ROW($sth);
And of
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:47:37 -0700, Daevid Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux. PHP5.
Why does this fail when using an array element, but using a variable will
work? Why should PHP care what the variable is I'm trying to store into?
list($bar['CompanyCode'], $CompanyDB) =
check the manual for list. It mentions using only numerical array
indices for list. There is a warning on it even i beleive.
Jason
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:47:37 -0700, Daevid Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux. PHP5.
Why does this fail when using an array element, but using a variable
Most of the mails from php-general is going is marked as spam.
is anyone else experiencing the same?
Manoj
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Nope, mine go in the right placeunless it's spam. ;-) Make sure to
click Not Spam so that you show it that it's not supposed to be
spam.
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 20:23:42 +0100, Manoj Nahar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the mails from php-general is going is marked as spam.
is anyone else
Hi,
Where can i find the methods list of module COM ?
Ex : $Odject = new COM(WinNT://domain);
Thanks !
Matt
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Matthieu Loudes wrote --- napsal::
Hi,
Where can i find the methods list of module COM ?
Ex : $Odject = new COM(WinNT://domain);
Thanks !
Matt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Forwarded to the list...
- Pôvodná správa -
Predmet: RE: [PHP] list methods of class COM ?
Dátum: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:06:25 -0400
Od: Gryffyn, Trevor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pre: Marek Kilimajer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not familiar with using COM(WinNT://domain) but I've done quite a
bit with COM
Hi List,
I am trying to list all files in a remote url for processing into my attempt
at a search engine but I cant work out how to list the files found in a
given domain name.
The manual has nothing on this, as I can see, and searching the web has
drawn a blank.
So I ask the list if there is a
Dave Carrera wrote:
Hi List,
I am trying to list all files in a remote url for processing into my attempt
at a search engine but I cant work out how to list the files found in a
given domain name.
The manual has nothing on this, as I can see, and searching the web has
drawn a blank.
So I ask the
I came across an interesting problem today which I have found a work
around but was wondering if anyone on the list had a better way to solve
this problem.
Been writing some php scripts on a Linux system using PHP 4.2.2. Basic
script works just fine there and does what is needed.
Moved this
Scot L. Harris wrote:
I came across an interesting problem today which I have found a work
around but was wondering if anyone on the list had a better way to solve
this problem.
Been writing some php scripts on a Linux system using PHP 4.2.2. Basic
script works just fine there and does what is
From: Scot L. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I came across an interesting problem today which I have found a work
around but was wondering if anyone on the list had a better way to solve
this problem.
Been writing some php scripts on a Linux system using PHP 4.2.2. Basic
script works just fine
I'm using list like
list($a,$b,$c,$d) = $MyArray
MyArray holds more than three items, 0-4 more,
my problem is that $d only gets one and I lose the others if more tha one
extra. I know I can just add more $e,f,g,h,i but how do I get the extras
into an array?
TIA
RGauthier
--
PHP General Mailing
On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 21:13, PHPDiscuss - PHP Newsgroups and mailing
lists wrote:
I'm using list like
list($a,$b,$c,$d) = $MyArray
MyArray holds more than three items, 0-4 more,
my problem is that $d only gets one and I lose the others if more tha one
extra. I know I can just add more
Hi all,
I have a search where I search inside a document and count how many times I
found a given word.
My problem is that I have a list e.g. $list_path this is a string of where the
file is location on the server what I need help on this getting this list
into array format of
On 16 Mar 2004 Freddy Rodriguez wrote:
Hay una lista en español para php?
(Is there a list in Spanish for PHP?)
Si hay. Mira http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php y
http://news.php.net/group.php?group=php.general.es.
(Yes there is. See the two URLs above.)
--
Tom
--
PHP General Mailing
Hi
How can I get a list of all constants defined with define()?
--
Grüsse
Marco
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mar 15, 2004, at 3:23 PM, Marco Schuler wrote:
Hi
How can I get a list of all constants defined with define()?
Marco,
Like the manual (http://nl2.php.net/constants) says: Use
get_defined_constants() to get a list of all defined constants.
Regards,
Filip de Waard
--
PHP General Mailing
Hi
Am Mo, 2004-03-15 um 15.52 schrieb Filip de Waard:
On Mar 15, 2004, at 3:23 PM, Marco Schuler wrote:
Hi
How can I get a list of all constants defined with define()?
Marco,
Like the manual (http://nl2.php.net/constants) says: Use
get_defined_constants() to get a list of all
Hi Marco,
You can use get_defined_constans(void)
-- begin code --
print_r(get_defined_constants());
-- end code --
Good Luck,
Firman
- Original Message -
From: Marco Schuler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 9:23 PM
Subject: [PHP] List of all
Hi,
is it possible to have a file that lists all of the files in the current so
that users can download them - this would be useful for a collection of
images I have?
Thanks for your help
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Shaun mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Friday, February 27, 2004 10:14 AM said:
is it possible to have a file that lists all of the files in the
current so that users can download them - this would be useful
for a collection of images I have?
yes. look up the file system functions in the
Hi,
Hi,
is it possible to have a file that lists all of the files in the current
so
that users can download them
Yes, belive it or not...it IS possible.
- this would be useful for a collection of
images I have?
Sure sounds like it.
Thanks for your help
Most welcome.
Incase the above
Shaun wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to have a file that lists all of the files in the current so
that users can download them - this would be useful for a collection of
images I have?
Thanks for your help
it's only a few lines of code and you will find it here:
Is there a List of validated PHP extentions for thead safety? I'm trying to
find out if moving to Apache 2 is at all possible in a production
environment, and would like to check to see if the modules we use are thread
safe.
Thanks,
Steven Roussey
Network54 Corporation
--
PHP General Mailing
Can anyone pls tell me how to dynamically list values in a ListMenu. The values do not
come from any database. They are stored in php variables. Sample code will be highly
appreciated.
Array. I am interested to know for both the cases.
Thanks !
From: Nathan Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 12/21/2003 8:00 AM
To: Chakravarthy Cuddapah
Subject: Re: [PHP] List values
Are the values in an array or individually in variables?
Nathan
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 December 2003 12:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] List values
Can anyone pls tell me how to dynamically list values in a
ListMenu. The values do not come from any database. They are
stored in php variables. Sample code will be highly appreciated.
--
PHP
__
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to whom it
is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged
information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute,
I just got an email from some daemon claiming to be the PHP List
Automoderator asking me to reply before my e-mail could be sent to the
list. I assume that this is a spam bot. Anybody else having this
problem?
-Dan
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:49:44 -0400, Dan Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just got an email from some daemon claiming to be the PHP List
Automoderator asking me to reply before my e-mail could be sent to the
list. I assume that this is a spam bot. Anybody else having this
problem
Just wanted to get the consesus of the other list members... Is it SoBig
that is making the list so slow? It's taking about hour an or more for
my messages to come back to me.
Chris.
p.s. Probably a good idea to send responses off list if it's just to say
Yeah that's happening to me too!
--
List Administrator,
Google spidered the web view to the list and is indexing our email
addresses. Any chance you can edit the code to change [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
show as user at domain dot com as many of the public message boards do?
This will help reduce the spam we get.
Johnny
--
PHP General
Johnny Martinez mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:07 AM said:
Google spidered the web view to the list and is indexing our email
addresses. Any chance you can edit the code to change
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to show as user at domain dot com as many of the
public message
www.phpbuilder.com is doing this.
J
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:07 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] List Administrator
List Administrator,
Google spidered the web view to the list and is indexing our email
ack! these folks are doing it too: http://archives.neohapsis.com
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:14 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] List Administrator
www.phpbuilder.com is doing this.
J
-Original
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 11:11, Chris W. Parker wrote:
Johnny Martinez mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:07 AM said:
Google spidered the web view to the list and is indexing our email
addresses. Any chance you can edit the code to change
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to show
* Thus wrote Johnny Martinez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
List Administrator,
Google spidered the web view to the list and is indexing our email
addresses. Any chance you can edit the code to change [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
show as user at domain dot com as many of the public message boards do?
This will
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 11:07, Johnny Martinez wrote:
List Administrator,
Google spidered the web view to the list and is indexing our email
addresses. Any chance you can edit the code to change [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
show as user at domain dot com as many of the public message boards do?
This
do they just scan the pages, or do they look at the final ouput (ei,
after all the document.write's)?
I dont know much about this stuff.
document.write(user + @ + domain. + com);
Johnny Martinez wrote:
List Administrator,
Google spidered the web view to the list and is indexing our email
Lars Torben Wilson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:15 AM said:
'Until' is a bit optimistic. They've been doing that for quite some
time now. :)
In that case my point is proven.
You could also liken this to the idea that security through obscurity is
not security at
I like the list filter suggestion. Many lists do this. Sent on behalf of
type thing.
J
-Original Message-
From: Chris W. Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Lars Torben Wilson
Cc: Johnny Martinez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] List
Any body else getting a message back with subject like:
[ERR] Re: [PHP] subject of message.
With contents:
Transmit Report:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 402 Local User Inbox Full ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I tried contacting the list admin and posted a message here ealier
this weekend about fixing this
Nope, I too have gotten a few of those and its a pain in the @ss.
- Original Message -
From: Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:26 PM
Subject: [PHP] List Problems
Any body else getting a message back with subject like:
[ERR] Re: [PHP
Any body else getting a message back with subject like:
[ERR] Re: [PHP] subject of message.
yeah, i'm getting that every now and then. maybe 1 or 2 a day tho...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I've been getting them too. The really annoying bit is that the most likely
reason for it is that the lucky devil hanmir is probably on holiday!
On Monday 28 Jul 2003 6:26 pm, Curt Zirzow wrote:
Any body else getting a message back with subject like:
[ERR] Re: [PHP] subject of message.
On Jul 28, 2003, skate claimed that:
|
|
| Any body else getting a message back with subject like:
| [ERR] Re: [PHP] subject of message.
|
|
|yeah, i'm getting that every now and then. maybe 1 or 2 a day tho...
[Regression mode] Not to start the discussion all over again, but if the
responses
Is it just me getting some messages 3 times?
I also noticed that there is no Reply-To in the headers so every time I
want to reply to the list I have to copy/paste the list's address, clicking
the Reply button would send my message to the poster, not the list.
I guess others are having the same
* Thus wrote Andu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Is it just me getting some messages 3 times?
I also noticed that there is no Reply-To in the headers so every time I
want to reply to the list I have to copy/paste the list's address, clicking
the Reply button would send my message to the poster, not
On Sunday 20 July 2003 14:42, Andu wrote:
Is it just me getting some messages 3 times?
I also noticed that there is no Reply-To in the headers so every time I
want to reply to the list I have to copy/paste the list's address, clicking
the Reply button would send my message to the poster, not
--On Sunday, July 20, 2003 16:35:46 +0800 Jason Wong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 20 July 2003 14:42, Andu wrote:
Is it just me getting some messages 3 times?
I also noticed that there is no Reply-To in the headers so every time I
want to reply to the list I have to copy/paste the list's
On Monday 21 July 2003 00:39, Andu wrote:
The executive summary is that there is nothing to be fixed. If you're
using a less than adequate mail client which does not understand the
mailing list info contained in the headers then you should either change
clients or, even easier, just
201 - 300 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
