On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Actually I think ".." is quite error-prone, because it is hard to
> distinguish from "." or "_" on the _first_ glance, which makes the get
> quickly through the code. [1]
>
I surround all operators except member access ("." and "->") with
2013/8/22 David Harkness
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
>> Sebastian Krebs wrote:
>
> > Actually the problem is, that the dot "." is already in use. With
>
> > $foo.bar() you cannot tell, if you want to call the method "bar()" on
>> the
>> > object "$foo", or if you w
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Actually the problem is, that the dot "." is already in use. With
> $foo.bar() you cannot tell, if you want to call the method "bar()" on the
> > object "$foo", or if you want to concatenate the value of "$foo" to
Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> 2013/8/21 Curtis Maurand
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry in advance for the top post.
>>
>> Use the right tool for
>> the Job.
I've use Java, C# and PHP.
>>
>> 1. I hate the
>> Perl-like object calls in PHP. I'd rather use "."
notation
>> in C# and Java. It saves a lot of wear
2013/8/21 Curtis Maurand
>
>
>
> Sorry in advance for the top post.
>
> Use the right tool for
> the Job. I've use Java, C# and PHP.
>
> 1. I hate the
> Perl-like object calls in PHP. I'd rather use "." notation
> in C# and Java. It saves a lot of wear and tear on my left pinky
> finger.
>
A
Sorry in advance for the top post.
Use the right tool for
the Job. I've use Java, C# and PHP.
1. I hate the
Perl-like object calls in PHP. I'd rather use "." notation
in C# and Java. It saves a lot of wear and tear on my left pinky
finger.
2. Java and C# are both typed languages. Say wha
On 21 Aug 2013, at 15:01, "georg chambert" wrote:
> my I shake the subject a little; Ive been doing some PHP and found it "ok" to
> work with
> not so much fuss, but that was PHP4, what about PHP5 ?
> Dont really checked the difference but made a short-scan and found that it
> had be
> screwed
t; had be
> screwed around with ?
>
> Any think, should I change to 5 ?
>
ehm ... serious?
http://php.net/eol.php
>
> BR georg
>
> - Original Message - From: "Tim Streater"
> To: "PHP List" ;
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:59 PM
to 5 ?
BR georg
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Streater"
To: "PHP List" ;
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:59 PM
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA
On 20 Aug 2013 at 23:59, PHP List wrote:
While I don't have any references to back it up - my guess wou
On 20 Aug 2013 at 23:59, PHP List wrote:
> While I don't have any references to back it up - my guess would be that
> Java may be seen as more versatile in general programming terms. A
> staggering number of enterprise level web applications are built with
> Java, add to that the possibility of
Geoff Caplan wrote:
>Michael
>
>>>the "Why PHP" on zend.com is a great place to go for this sort of
>>>
>stuff...
>
>>Honestly, it doesn't seem all that professional a resource paper...
>>
>
>I would tend to agree - not something you could show to a hard-headed
>corporate purchasing committee wit
Michael
> > the "Why PHP" on zend.com is a great place to go for this sort of
stuff...
> >
> Honestly, it doesn't seem all that professional a resource paper...
I would tend to agree - not something you could show to a hard-headed
corporate purchasing committee with any confidence.
>
> I believ
Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> http://www.zend.com/zend/art/php-over-java.php
>
> the "Why PHP" on zend.com is a great place to go for this sort of stuff...
>
Honestly, it doesn't seem all that professional a resource paper for
some reason. It's not technical enough, primarily, and I don't think
http://www.zend.com/zend/art/php-over-java.php
the "Why PHP" on zend.com is a great place to go for this sort of stuff...
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Geoff Caplan wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Just putting together a brochure for a product authored in PHP, and making
> the case for LAMP (Linux/Apache/MySQL/PH
14 matches
Mail list logo
