Nathan Rixham wrote:
it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
anything else is going to be flawed
Not at all - you issue voting-rights based on user identity. Works very
well in many places. Here in
At 1:19 PM +0100 2/21/09, Per Jessen wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
anything else is going to be flawed
Not at all - you issue voting-rights based on user identity.
tedd wrote:
[agree with all of the above]
So in Switzerland if each of you have a ID card, then the problem is
solved as descried above. However, if there is no ID card, then
other methods must be considered.
It's not the ID-card as such (it's your ability to prove your own
identity), but
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Ashley Sheridan napsal(a):
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:34 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
anything else is going to be flawed
Hey now, what do you have against us clones?
;)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
anything else is going to be flawed
Hey now, what do you have against us clones?
;)
and nobody noticed I said
At 11:09 PM + 2/20/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
anything else is going to be flawed
Hey now, what do you have
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to
input your email address - and if I would I
would not vote - because it's a waste of my
time... if you want me to vote you do everything
you can to make it as pleasant as possible --
certainly that
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
address - and if I would I would not vote - because it's a waste of
my time... if you want me to vote you do everything you can to make
it as pleasant as possible --
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to
input your email address - and if I would I
would not vote - because it's a waste of my
time... if you want me to vote you do
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
address - and if I would I would not vote - because it's a waste of
my time... if you want me to vote
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need
to input your email address - and if I would
I would not vote - because
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
address - and if I would I would not
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
address - and if
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:34 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At
Ashley Sheridan napsal(a):
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:34 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd
At 5:47 AM +0200 2/18/09, Ian wrote:
Anyone had to deal with this in the past and does anyone have any
suggestions/ideas as to how I could better this setup?
Many thanks in advance,
Ian
Ian:
As other people have said, using IP's are not really a good solution.
If it was me, I would ask the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 5:47 AM +0200 2/18/09, Ian wrote:
Anyone had to deal with this in the past and does anyone have any
suggestions/ideas as to how I could better this setup?
Many thanks in advance,
Ian
Ian:
As other people have said,
At 1:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
Granted this is an involved method, but email addresses are unique and thus
ensures one vote per email address.
E-mail addresses are (somewhat unique -- not getting into
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:43 PM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 1:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
Granted this is an involved method, but email addresses are unique and
thus
ensures one vote per
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 15:54 -0500, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:43 PM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 1:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
Granted this is an involved method, but
At 3:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
You're missing my point. Yes, e-mail addresses are unique delivery
points. They can not, however, uniquely identify one and only one
person -- which is what one would need in the OP's situation.
Andrew
Andrew:
No -- I did not miss you point,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:07 PM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 3:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
You're missing my point. Yes, e-mail addresses are unique delivery
points. They can not, however, uniquely identify one and only one
person -- which is what one would need in
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email address
- and if I would I would not vote - because it's a waste of my time...
if you want me to vote you do everything you can to make it as pleasant
as possible -- certainly that isn't requirement of an email validation.
Ian wrote:
Hi,
I am busy building an application that requires one time voting and to get
around the user deleting a cookie that I set im keeping a hash on my side
which I then try match before allowing anything.
I assume this is backed by a db of some sort.
$query = update user set
Hi,
Yep it is backed by DB and i do record when they vote - but its still flawed
in how to track unique users :) Thanks though - will continue to look
further.
Cheers
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chris dmag...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian wrote:
Hi,
I am busy building an application that
Ian wrote:
Hi,
Yep it is backed by DB and i do record when they vote - but its still
flawed in how to track unique users :) Thanks though - will continue to
look further.
Do you have to log in to vote?
How are you stopping people from signing up multiple times?
--
Postgresql php
We dont have registration - its a once off vote anonymously using the hash
in the original email. We dont want registration otherwise it would be much
easier - but this was the best way I could think of without user
registration :/
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Chris dmag...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Is there any way of doing this:
1. User may vote 1-10 on a joke on a site X.
2. Same User may NOT vote again dependent of the computer...
I know this works if I check IP-adress, but because some users doesn't
have
a fixed ip-adress... it won't work correct.
Thought of getting a
I'm going to agree with Jay... most users are lazy enough that if you
just require them to have a user account then that will suffice.
Since this is only for a joke site that would be my suggestion as
well. However, if you really, really wanted to identify remote
*computers* then you can try
33 matches
Mail list logo
