Daevid Vincent is surprised that:
$num = 123;
$num = $num++;
print $num; //this prints 123 and not 124 ?!!
To me this is relatively logical. As I understand it, the post-increment
operator says do
something with the variable, and then increment it. The trouble in this case is
that we
are
Hi PHP people
I have a really strange and annoying problem. I've got a site, where
members can download music. User clicks index.php (in index.php
there's an iframe, that opens another file), if certain check are okay
then a popup window opens download.php, where a mp3 file is fetched
from the
And then you discover ===
$i = 0; $j = count ($names); while ($i $j)
{ if ($names[$i] === $target) { break; }
++$i;
}
... regards
To: php-general@lists.php.net
From: clanc...@cybec.com.au
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 21:21:00 +1000
Subject: [PHP] A really wacky design decision
Daevid
Do you want users download the file or the zip?
do you send other headers before the download?
It's
quite a common error to set a default header in PHP at the beginning of
whatever application, while header should be used as last exit point
and never in the middle, or at the beginning, of a
I hope this isn't too basic of a question . . .
I'm having a problem with the Filesystem Functions, I think.
Specifically, I'm recursing through a directory, and have this code:
$size = filesize($file);
$type = filetype($file);
$date = filemtime($file);
I'm getting these warnings:
Warning:
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 09:07 -0400, Andrew Burgess wrote:
I hope this isn't too basic of a question . . .
I'm having a problem with the Filesystem Functions, I think.
Specifically, I'm recursing through a directory, and have this code:
$size = filesize($file);
$type = filetype($file);
u increment after! asigning, so far so good, but for math reasons the
interpreter has to keep in mind the 123 you want to assign before increment
to the same var.
this is absolutely correct what php does here.
$num = ++$num; would print 124
the same like
$num++;
on the other hand this is just
On 10/2/09 10:24 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 1:55 PM +0530 10/2/09, kranthi wrote:
and yes i forgot to mention... i avoid hidden form elements because
they can be modified very easily and hence pose a security threat.
That depends upon how sloppy you are in coding.
NONE of
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 15:33 +0200, Ralph Deffke wrote:
u increment after! asigning, so far so good, but for math reasons the
interpreter has to keep in mind the 123 you want to assign before increment
to the same var.
this is absolutely correct what php does here.
$num = ++$num; would
yes for using
$num = $num++;
yes !!
Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote in message
news:1254577641.2385.7.ca...@localhost...
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 15:33 +0200, Ralph Deffke wrote:
u increment after! asigning, so far so good, but for math reasons the
interpreter has to keep in
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 15:46 +0200, Ralph Deffke wrote:
yes for using
$num = $num++;
yes !!
Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote in message
news:1254577641.2385.7.ca...@localhost...
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 15:33 +0200, Ralph Deffke wrote:
u increment after! asigning, so
this is a clear sign that somebody is on a sin TRAIL, I would not even spend
the time on what sin collections this guy got
Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote in message
news:1254577986.2385.8.ca...@localhost...
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 15:46 +0200, Ralph Deffke wrote:
yes for using
Ben,
might be intersting to consider that in ur c axample u r working with a pure
memory position, while php works with references. thry it with pointers it
I'm pretty shure u get the same result as in PHP.
I'm not shure, because I don't work in perl, but doesn't per work on
references as well ?
At 7:11 PM +0100 10/2/09, MEM wrote:
I don't want to take another path. The hidden fields seems the way to go.
However, you gave me the example above, and I'm not understanding how can I
pass from your example: A multi-step form.
To what I was looking form: 1 step form with a success page that
At 9:42 AM -0400 10/3/09, Tom Worster wrote:
On 10/2/09 10:24 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 1:55 PM +0530 10/2/09, kranthi wrote:
and yes i forgot to mention... i avoid hidden form elements because
they can be modified very easily and hence pose a security threat.
That
Thats a lot of headers to read..
At a first glance I can see that you did not specify a content-length
header. this is a must and must be equal to the size of the file in
bytes
--
Kranthi.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 9:21 PM +1000 10/3/09, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Daevid Vincent is surprised that:
$num = 123;
$num = $num++;
print $num; //this prints 123 and not 124 ?!!
I can understand why someone might think this is not correct, but
they need to understand what is happening and why the above
At 2:01 PM -0700 10/2/09, Daevid Vincent wrote:
Why would you EVER want $num = $num++; to give you back the value you
already had? Even if we did $foo = $bar++; I would still logically (and
common sensely) expect $foo to be the increment of $bar!
You are right -- one should never structure a
At 5:12 PM -0400 10/2/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
Daevid Vincent wrote:
?PHP
$num = 123;
$num = $num++;
print $num; //this prints 123 and not 124 ?!!
$num = 123;
$num = ++$num;
print $num; //this prints 124 as expected
$num = 123;
$num++;
print $num; //this prints 124 as expected
$num =
At 2:28 PM -0700 10/2/09, Daevid Vincent wrote:
My problem isn't with $foo++ vs ++$foo per say. I use pre/post all the time.
My issue is that I see no reason to do the ASSIGNMENT FIRST and THEN
INCREMENT.
I see your point exactly.
The problem is with the statement of:
$num = $num++;
That
At 2:53 PM -0700 10/2/09, Ben Dunlap wrote:
$a = 2;
$a = $a++;
echo $a;
Honestly I think the only reason anyone would write an expression like
that is either to fake out the compiler or because they don't properly
understand the use of a unary operator. Or rather, of the
At 5:42 PM -0400 10/2/09, Daniel Brown wrote:
If you were to use $num++, it would echo out the current number,
THEN increment the value. In this example, it increments the value,
THEN echoes it out. The placement of the signs (plus or minus) is the
giveaway: if it's before the variable,
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 09:07 -0400, Andrew Burgess wrote:
I hope this isn't too basic of a question . . .
I'm having a problem with the Filesystem Functions, I think.
Specifically, I'm recursing through a
On 10/2/09 10:06 AM, MEM tal...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm now understanding that even if the form is submitted to self, we can
still use a redirect to a success_message_page.php. However, we must do
this redirect, AFTER the form has submitted to himself. It's the only thing
that we have to pay
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:49, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
That's absolutely true.
The problem here is in the statement of:
$num = $num++;
Yeah, I understood Daevid's email a bit better *after* I sent
mine. Then I was hoping no one noticed.
--
/Daniel P. Brown
On 10/3/09 9:53 AM, Ralph Deffke ralph_def...@yahoo.de wrote:
this is a clear sign that somebody is on a sin TRAIL, I would not even spend
the time on what sin collections this guy got
i see it more as ignorance than sin.
to misunderstand the difference between $n++ and ++$n is a beginner
On 10/3/09 7:21 AM, clanc...@cybec.com.au clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
However there is one feature of PHP which, to my mind, is really bad design.
How many of
you can see anything wrong with the following procedure to search a list of
names for a
particular name?
$i = 0; $j = count
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 11:57 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
On 10/3/09 7:21 AM, clanc...@cybec.com.au clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
However there is one feature of PHP which, to my mind, is really bad design.
How many of
you can see anything wrong with the following procedure to search a list
tedd wrote:
At 9:21 PM +1000 10/3/09, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Daevid Vincent is surprised that:
$num = 123;
$num = $num++;
print $num; //this prints 123 and not 124 ?!!
I can understand why someone might think this is not correct, but
they need to understand what is happening and
On 10/3/09 12:25 PM, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 11:57 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
On 10/3/09 7:21 AM, clanc...@cybec.com.au clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
However there is one feature of PHP which, to my mind, is really bad design.
How many of
you
Tom Worster wrote:
On 10/3/09 12:25 PM, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 11:57 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
On 10/3/09 7:21 AM, clanc...@cybec.com.au clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
However there is one feature of PHP which, to my mind, is really bad design.
... and, in fact, that /is/ how C behaves. The following code:
int a = 2;
a = a++;
printf(a = [%d]\n, a);
Will output a = [3]. At least on Ubuntu 9 using gcc 4.3.3.
So I retract my initial terse reply and apologize for misunderstanding
your question.
Ben
It's not that difficult
I'm trying to install a webmail in a new server with the following items:
Debian 2.6.26-2-amd64
horde 3.2.2
imp 4.2.4
apache 2.2.9
php 5.2.6
when I try to install for the first time to configure it by web, it show the
following:
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or
if we compare via == there is an implicit cast to the most primitive form.
These are all true, and all have a reason, and make sense:
// (int)'abc' is 0
var_dump('abc' == 0);
// 'abc' is not an empty string
var_dump('abc' == true);
// 2 is not 0, which would be casted into false, so it's true
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
If you use APD or you think about the low level logic behind comparing string,
num and bool you'll probably forget the == operator and you'll
never miss
again the === one ... then you'll start to explicit cast
everything, when
necessary, to have all your code truly
You introduced the word suddenly, it's about 10 years I develop in PHP
Regards
PHP allows you to do either. If I find myself being more strict in no
way does that mean I'll suddenly jump to another language. It just means
I have a bit of code that requires a bit more strictness. Should I
At 1:37 PM -0400 10/3/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 9:21 PM +1000 10/3/09, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Daevid Vincent is surprised that:
$num = 123;
$num = $num++;
print $num; //this prints 123 and not 124 ?!!
I can understand why someone might think this is not correct, but
Ben Dunlap wrote:
... and, in fact, that /is/ how C behaves. The following code:
No, that's implementation's behaviour. AFAIK, the normative document
give to compiler the behaviour implementation. So, it can do
optimization, that gives strange behaviour for a people how think
increment
Hello, I've downloaded the VC6 PHP 5.3.0 windows zip
(php-5.3.0-nts-Win32-VC6-x86.zip) and I don't see the file
php5apache2.dll in it. php5apache.dll is in there, but the apache 2 file
isn't. Where can I find this file?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
Floydian wrote:
Hello, I've downloaded the VC6 PHP 5.3.0 windows zip
(php-5.3.0-nts-Win32-VC6-x86.zip) and I don't see the file
php5apache2.dll in it. php5apache.dll is in there, but the apache 2 file
isn't. Where can I find this file?
I've found the dll :)
The php5apache2.dll and
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, hack988 hack988 hack...@dev.htwap.com wrote:
From: hack988 hack988 hack...@dev.htwap.com
Subject: Re: [PHP] windows 5.2.10 PHP not working with phpinfo
To: Fred Silsbee fredsils...@yahoo.com
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:35 AM
Please
41 matches
Mail list logo
