On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:13 AM, HallMarc Websites
wrote:
> Seems strange that you are given a choice. My clients have been telling me
> that they are told to get the latest Acrobat Reader by Safari. Which they
> have done (again why allow a plugin that isn't supported get installed to
> begin
On 16 Nov 2011 at 12:13, HallMarc Websites wrote:
> Seems strange that you are given a choice. My clients have been telling me
> that they are told to get the latest Acrobat Reader by Safari. Which they have
> done (again why allow a plugin that isn't supported get installed to begin
> with) onl
> I have to say that I still really have no clue what you are talking about. Why
> would anyone with OS X want Acrobat Reader, when there is a perfectly
> good [1] application (note: application, not "feature") available that does
> the
> task just as well. And when the PDF shows up in Safari you
On 16 Nov 2011 at 00:43, HallMarc Websites wrote:
> And in conclusion; sorry, I get uppity after a long day LOL. It's as I already
> thought; the answer is NO. So here is what I will do for any of you looking
> for an answer and stumbling across my slight rant, I will detect if it is
> Safari 5.
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:04:42 -0500, HallMarc Websites
sent:
On the face of it, if you are writing a PHP application for others to use,
*forcing* a particular behaviour on them (on *their* own machine) is
probably not a good idea. Why not let the user deal with this as
they see fit?
One can
And in conclusion; sorry, I get uppity after a long day LOL. It's as I already
thought; the answer is NO. So here is what I will do for any of you looking for
an answer and stumbling across my slight rant, I will detect if it is Safari
5.1.x and then just remove the view link and leave them with
> On the face of it, if you are writing a PHP application for others to use,
> *forcing* a particular behaviour on them (on *their* own machine) is
> probably not a good idea. Why not let the user deal with this as they see fit?
> One can go way too far trying to ensure a uniform experience among u
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:36:58 +, Ashley Sheridan
sent:
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 23:15 +0100, Matijn Woudt wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM, HallMarc Websites
wrote:
> I'm sure everyone here is aware that the latest Mac OS and Safari
5.1.x do not support opening PDFs in the browser w
On 15 Nov 2011 at 22:36, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> I always thought that opening a PDF inside the browser was a rubbish
> idea anyway. I've uninstalled Adobe Reader from my work machine now and
> the world is a happier place!
Well I'd rather it displays in the browser initially, which it does bu
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 23:15 +0100, Matijn Woudt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM, HallMarc Websites
> wrote:
> > I'm sure everyone here is aware that the latest Mac OS and Safari 5.1.x do
> > not support opening PDFs in the browser window with Acrobat Reader plugin
> > anymore. It is n
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM, HallMarc Websites
wrote:
> I'm sure everyone here is aware that the latest Mac OS and Safari 5.1.x do
> not support opening PDFs in the browser window with Acrobat Reader plugin
> anymore. It is now necessary to open them with Preview instead. My question
> is
I'm sure everyone here is aware that the latest Mac OS and Safari 5.1.x do not
support opening PDFs in the browser window with Acrobat Reader plugin anymore.
It is now necessary to open them with Preview instead. My question is this,
does anyone know if it is possible to force Safari to use Prev
12 matches
Mail list logo
