Example/working code here:
https://gist.github.com/mhulse/5833826
Couple questions:
1. Is there anything wrong with the way I'm using the abstract class?
If so, how could I improve the logic/setup?
2. Is there a way for me to pass $foo to the parent class, from the
child, without having to
Hi :
could you file a bug at https://bugs.php.net/
this is the proper way to report a bug :)
thanks
--
Laruence Xinchen Hui
http://www.laruence.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
You think this is PHP's bug? I'm not sure. Because PHP installed not
latest version and yesterday i tune memory_limit setting to 256M (was
-1) and no segfaults registered since that moment. I think, bad
designed script allocate too much memory and php-fpm worker become mad
and kill himself. But
I am running a server with cPanel on and want to have php run as a cgi with
Suexec enabled
I cannot seem to rectify an issue, when I set the handler to cgi, my rewrite
rules on one of my sites stop working
Sample url: http://examplesite.com/ad/123-abcde/
The rewrite rule for this is below;
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Shaun Morrow morrow.sh...@gmail.comwrote:
I am running a server with cPanel on and want to have php run as a cgi
with
Suexec enabled
I cannot seem to rectify an issue, when I set the handler to cgi, my
rewrite
rules on one of my sites stop working
Sample
Hello. I'm getting problem.
OS: Ububtu Server 2.6.38-8-server
PHP: PHP 5.3.5-1ubuntu7.2 with Suhosin-Patch
Work over fastcgi (fpm) with cherokee web server.
PHP fall often with such messages in syslog:
Sep 28 11:01:25 userver kernel: [278665.292418] php5-fpm[31892]:
segfault at 80001000321 ip
Hi All,
I am PHP 4 PHP 5 developer for last 6 yrs. Last year also got Zend
certification.
Since now I have work on different CMS, Social Networking, telecome , horse
racing domains.
But now I am little bored with developing website. What other things I can
do with PHP ?
Even I believe my
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 09:53, Rakesh Mishra rakesh.mis...@gmail.com wrote:
Even I believe my knowledge, interest, market value with PHP 5 is getting
saturated.
Do you guys suggest me what other thing I can learn or work which help me to
keep my lust for PHP alive
and also boost my career.
On 10/08/2010 22:06, 惠新宸 wrote:
test,
i can't send mail to lists?
thanks
On 10/08/2010 22:02, 惠新宸 wrote:
Hi:
1. you can be a Software Architect
2. you can abstract common requirements, developed php extension.
thanks.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 07:23:59PM +0530, Rakesh Mishra wrote:
Hi All,
I am PHP 4 PHP 5 developer for last 6 yrs. Last year also got Zend
certification.
Since now I have work on different CMS, Social Networking, telecome , horse
racing domains.
But now I am little bored with
On 8 October 2010 14:53, Rakesh Mishra rakesh.mis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am PHP 4 PHP 5 developer for last 6 yrs. Last year also got Zend
certification.
Since now I have work on different CMS, Social Networking, telecome , horse
racing domains.
But now I am little bored with
Hi all
PHP manual state We do not recommend using a threaded MPM in production
with Apache 2. Use the prefork MPM instead, or use Apache 1. For information
on why, read the related FAQ entry on using Apache2 with a threaded MPM (
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.apache2.php )
From
I'm working on a project using SOAP and WS-Security in which I am failing
miserably.
Is there a way to inspect the actual XML, header, etc. that is actually
being sent. I feel like I am constructing the call correctly, and I know
exactly what needs to be sent, but I dont know how to see exactly
Of Russell
Jones
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:22 AM
To: PHP General
Subject: [PHP] PHP5 SOAP...
I'm working on a project using SOAP and WS-Security in which I am failing
miserably.
Is there a way to inspect the actual XML, header, etc. that is actually
being sent. I feel like I am constructing
Hi,
Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 1:21:47 AM, you wrote:
RJ I'm working on a project using SOAP and WS-Security in which I am failing
RJ miserably.
RJ Is there a way to inspect the actual XML, header, etc. that is actually
RJ being sent. I feel like I am constructing the call correctly, and I know
Hello,
I like to install a forum for my customers and additional a PHP5 based
Web-Chat system with publich and private chatrooms.
What can you recommend?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
I just saw that mhash is disabled in the spec file for php5 if SUSE version
is 11.0 or higher.
Simple question, does it do any harm?
I know it's been deprecated in favor for hash, but I have quite a few apps
using mhash still, so if it doesn't do any harm I thought I'd continue using
it until all
Anders Norrbring wrote:
I just saw that mhash is disabled in the spec file for php5 if SUSE version
is 11.0 or higher.
Simple question, does it do any harm?
If they decided to do that it's best to ask suse (or on the opensuse
lists if you're using that flavour).
It may just be because it's
Hi there,
I'm trying to find out how to generate a WSDL with the functions I am
providing as web services, and I'm finding various posts on the net that
say it's not possible with the SOAP extension built in PHP5.
At the same time, I find that
http://www.php.net/manual/en/soap.constants.php
Hi there,
after strugling a while with the installation of php5 on an older suse
system with mysql 3.x and apache 1.x I got it compiled and installed.
Apache starts and there are processes running, even the access log shows
access to it. Response is 500 (internal error). The page itself
Hi there. I don't kno id this is the correct place to post but...
I am using the PHP5 DOM to make up RSS Feeds ..
A Problem I have is I want to make this up for itunes..
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
rss version=2.00 xmlns:itunes=http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd;
etc..
I
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wrote:
Hello!
Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which is good.
I am now running a course in PHP, using PHP 5, where we are going to
use the *DOM* interface. I am trying to teach them good OO practices,
meaning that
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Nick Stinemates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wrote:
Hello!
Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which is good.
I am now running a course in PHP, using PHP 5, where we are going to
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:25:29AM -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Nick Stinemates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wrote:
Hello!
Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which is good.
I
Nick Stinemates wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:25:29AM -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Nick Stinemates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wrote:
Hello!
Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which
Data Hiding IS Encapsulation.
But, you have to agree,
?php
class Lol {
private $bar;
public function getBar() { return $bar }
public function setBar($bar) { $this-bar = $bar}
}
?
Is no different than:
?php
class Lol {
public $bar;
}
?
Here's a more thought out argument from
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Nick Stinemates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:25:29AM -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Nick Stinemates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Nick Stinemates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's a relatively narrow minded response to my point, since I gave
a pretty concrete example of exactly what I meant,
no, its a very valid criticism of your flawed example. you supply a
definition of encapsulation,
Nick Stinemates wrote:
Data Hiding IS Encapsulation.
But, you have to agree,
?php
class Lol {
private $bar;
public function getBar() { return $bar }
public function setBar($bar) { $this-bar = $bar}
}
?
Is no different than:
?php
class Lol {
public $bar;
}
?
Here's a more thought out argument
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 11:50 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
Nick Stinemates wrote:
Data Hiding IS Encapsulation.
But, you have to agree,
?php
class Lol {
private $bar;
public function getBar() { return $bar }
public function setBar($bar) { $this-bar = $bar}
}
?
Is no different
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me quote, you said this: Is no different than You are wrong, in
fact it IS different. Having your own custom methods to get or set data
allows you to have more control over what data is injected into your object.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What he means is don't ask for the data literally (by property name) ask
for it via a method. This allows wrapping the data in work. This is a
moot issue in PHP since PHP allows trapping the property accessor.
i dont
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:17 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What he means is don't ask for the data literally (by property name) ask
for it via a method. This allows wrapping the data in work. This is a
moot issue in
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nope, the point is moot. If I've made my properties publicly accessible,
now, due to the ability to trap via __get() or __set(), I can remove
them and handle them. Thus, I can retrospectively change the semantics
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:54 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nope, the point is moot. If I've made my properties publicly accessible,
now, due to the ability to trap via __get() or __set(), I can remove
them and handle
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:54 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nope, the point is moot. If I've made my properties publicly
accessible,
now,
Hello!
Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which is good.
I am now running a course in PHP, using PHP 5, where we are going to
use the *DOM* interface. I am trying to teach them good OO practices,
meaning that we insistently hide properties and expose them as get or
set methods.
I use PayPal as my ecommerce solution and I have a PHP script that captures
variables posted from PayPal to populate my database. The time variable
string is sent in the following format: HH:MM:SS DD Mmm YY, PST. The
script worked fine but since I upgraded to PHP5 the dates inputted into my
On Monday 10 March 2008, Samuel Marshall wrote:
I use PayPal as my ecommerce solution and I have a PHP script that captures
variables posted from PayPal to populate my database. The time variable
string is sent in the following format: HH:MM:SS DD Mmm YY, PST. The
script worked fine but
Hi,
i'm currently learning php by implementing a blog system. This uses xsl for
transformation to (x)html. It is working so far, but it is slow.
As far as i can see the XSLTProcessor is doing a validation. Doing the same
transformation with xsltproc (the command line tool for libxslt) takes
Hi everyone!
Generaly author of the first e-mail is right. Ofcource, crawling over the
code and getting out of it a few milliseconds off doesn't make it worth, but
you can learn what is good and what is bad and write your code correctly
from the start.
Why not to use
foreach ($data as $value)
if
On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote:
Hi Fellows,
I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not inherit classes,
I hope I use the right word.
I mean the class sub_class extends main_class notation.
As well I figured out, that I in most cases should references in
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote:
Hi Fellows,
I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not inherit classes,
I hope I use the right word.
I mean the class sub_class extends main_class notation.
As well I figured out, that I in most cases
On Dec 31, 2007 3:37 PM, Michael McGlothlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote:
Hi Fellows,
I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not inherit classes,
I hope I use the right word.
I mean the class
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Dec 31, 2007 3:37 PM, Michael McGlothlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote:
Hi Fellows,
I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not inherit
On Dec 31, 2007 3:47 PM, Michael McGlothlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Dec 31, 2007 3:37 PM, Michael McGlothlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote:
Hi
Hi Fellows,
I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not inherit classes,
I hope I use the right word.
I mean the class sub_class extends main_class notation.
As well I figured out, that I in most cases should references in
foreach loops. like
foreach($array as $key = $value) {
}
Lots
Hi Robert, Stut List
Thanks for your replies which arrived after I had gone to bed |-Z
Robert :-
In PHP5 objects are no longer copied when assigned. Instead the object's
handle is assigned (similar to a reference but not quite). So the
behaviour is as expected.
Stut :-
I think I have
David Restall - System Administrator wrote:
My main obesrvation is that I'm glad that I decided to revisit all my
old PHP4 stuff and rewrite or clean it up. I have hundreds of
$Working_Class = $Under_Class;
lines in my code as well as
$Upper_Class = $Aristocracy;
lines too. I think the
Hi fellows:
I'm trying to mount PHP5 ( the last stable version from php.net) under a
IIS6 (win2k3 SP2), and when I run the .msi and it finish it said that is not
possible the configure httpd.conf, which is a very big mistake 'cause I'm
specify that I use IIS6.
After that I try making a
sure the php5isapi.dll is
mapped to the .php extension.
Regards,
Carlton Whitehead
- Original Message -
From: Alberto García Gómez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 9:57:42 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: [PHP] PHP5 under IIS6
Hi fellows
Hi,
I think I have discovered a bug in php5. If I haven't, I've discovered
a bug in the documentation or a bug in my brain.
php -v :-
PHP 5.2.3 (cli) (built: Jun 26 2007 15:38:48)
Copyright (c) 1997-2007 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2007 Zend Technologies
I've
In PHP5 objects are no longer copied when assigned. Instead the object's
handle is assigned (similar to a reference but not quite). So the
behaviour is as expected.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 21:42 +0100, David Restall - System Administrator
wrote:
Hi,
I think I have discovered a
David Restall - System Administrator wrote:
I think I have discovered a bug in php5. If I haven't, I've discovered
a bug in the documentation or a bug in my brain.
Start here: http://php.net/language.oop5.cloning
-Stut
--
http://stut.net/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:57:57 +0300, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey.
Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have
customers
have some
nice web albums or blog. The turkish
I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey.
Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have customers
have some
nice web albums or blog. The turkish translation files of such opensource
software
usually use gettext and .po files for i18n and are always a bit behind the
On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey.
Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have customers
have some
nice web albums or blog. The turkish translation files of such opensource
software
usually use gettext and .po
Now that's service!
On 9/6/07, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey.
Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have
customers
have some
nice web albums or blog. The turkish
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:57:57 +0300, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey.
Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have
customers
have some
nice web albums or blog. The turkish
On 9/6/07, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey.
Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have customers
have some
nice web albums or blog. The turkish translation files of such
-I$PREFIX/include
export SOFLAGS=-L$PREFIX/lib
CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -arch i386 -arch ppc ./configure --prefix=$PREFIX
--program-suffix=-5.2.3 --libdir=$PREFIX/lib/php/php5 --includedir=
$PREFIX/include/php/php5 --with-apxs2=$PREFIX/bin/apxs
--with-config-file-path=$SYSCONFDIR --with-mysql=$PREFIX
Hi, new to PHP5 and I have a question about the object model.
I want to be able to create a class which is allows abstraction from
specifics. So for one example, imagine a generic database connection wrapper
which can have multiple drivers depending on the database used. Some of the
OK, so that came out fairly illegible. Try again:
Hi, new to PHP5 (and the forums evidently !) and I have a question about the
object model.
I want to be able to create a class which is allows abstraction from
specifics. So for one example, imagine a generic database connection wrapper
which can
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:46 +0100, Steve Perkins wrote:
I guess there are lots of workaround ways. I could write lots of
middleman code in generic and use things like __set and __get etc but its
lots of extra overhead. I also know I could use extends but that makes the
code the wrong way
I also don't really get the idea of interface and abstract classes ? They
don't seem to be any practical use ? Maybe that's me ? Anyway, not really
relevant to this post ...
there is a lot of usefulness in these constructs; look into design patterns.
also, there are code libraries already
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 12:07 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
I also don't really get the idea of interface and abstract classes ? They
don't seem to be any practical use ? Maybe that's me ? Anyway, not really
relevant to this post ...
there is a lot of usefulness in these constructs; look into
some ideas about class design:
1. properties should normally (read almost always) be private.
2. the apps interface to the DB [connection] is via the 'generic'
class, the app should have to know nothing about the drive object and
should have no direct access to it.
3. use an interface definition
Robert,
I looked at your code in InterJinn a couple of times; i havent gone over all
of it mind you but it looks pretty sweet.
have you had a look at any of the other frameworks i mentioned earlier in
this thread?
ez components, onPHP, and now there is a new one ive found (in recent
thread)
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 12:50 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
Robert,
I looked at your code in InterJinn a couple of times; i havent gone over all
of it mind you but it looks pretty sweet.
It's very different in many respects from other styles of coding. It's
an MVC approach for the most part but
You probably ought to have:
class mysql_driver extends generic_driver {
}
Seems like that would be the most reasonable OOP model, imho.
That said, I suspect that if you do something like:
$driver = $this-driver;
You then may be able to access the driver-specific data using
$driver-propl;
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 July 2007 21:29
To: Steve Perkins
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)
You probably ought to have:
class mysql_driver extends generic_driver { }
Seems like that would be the most reasonable OOP
hello, other interesting articles to give a bird's eye view of new
features for php5
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/php/2004/07/15/UpgradePHP5.html
http://devzone.zend.com/node/view/id/1714
http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/Whats-New-in-PHP-5/
hth.
yashesh bhatia.
On 6/26/07, Preethi [EMAIL
BlankHi,
Need to have a kick start on PHP5.
Kindly suggest me the good online tutorial for PHP5.
Am already working on php4.
Need to migrate from php4 to php5.
Regards,
Preethi.
Extn No: 4099
Some of the greatest science comes from those unaware of established rules and
theories.
Hi Preethi
Kindly suggest me the good online tutorial for PHP5.
Am already working on php4.
Need to migrate from php4 to php5.
i think this is very important for OOP:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.php
and this one:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.exceptions.php
if you want to spend a little i would recommend this book from php|arch
http://www.phparch.com/shop_product.php?itemid=135
-nathan
On 6/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Preethi
Kindly suggest me the good online tutorial for PHP5.
Am already working on php4.
Need to
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead.
Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost EVERYWHERE.
Yep, it is. PHP 4 is trying to eat your brains.
On 6/10/07, Larry Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead.
Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 11:01 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead.
Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost
At 10:05 PM -0400 6/9/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead.
Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost EVERYWHERE.
Cheers,
Rob.
Rob:
You raise an excellent and
On Sunday 10 June 2007, tedd wrote:
At 10:05 PM -0400 6/9/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead.
Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost EVERYWHERE.
Cheers,
Hi all,
After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I learned that
our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to rollback to version 4 ! . There is
no OO implementation like classes or objects in my scripts but every page has
some queries the question is : will my scripts
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 11:59 -0700, elk dolk wrote:
Hi all,
After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I learned
that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to rollback to version 4 ! .
There is no OO implementation like classes or objects in my scripts but every
On Sat, June 9, 2007 1:59 pm, elk dolk wrote:
After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I
learned that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to
rollback to version 4 ! . There is no OO implementation like
classes or objects in my scripts but every page has some
On 6/9/07, elk dolk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I learned that
our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to rollback to version 4 ! . There is
no OO implementation like classes or objects in my scripts but every page has
At 3:27 PM -0400 6/9/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 11:59 -0700, elk dolk wrote:
Hi all,
After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I
learned that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to rollback
to version 4 ! . There is no OO implementation
You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead. It
hasn't had a non-security/bug release in years. PHP 5 is 3 years old. The
one and only reason to care about PHP 4 at this point is if you're writing
something that has to run on any possible cheap shared web host, and
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 18:10 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 3:27 PM -0400 6/9/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 11:59 -0700, elk dolk wrote:
Hi all,
After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I
learned that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to rollback
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead.
Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost EVERYWHERE.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
..
| InterJinn Application
Andrei wrote:
Hi list,
I have a class which I use to parse simple bbcode inside some comments.
I noticed on PHP5 that scope of preg_replace function is changed
when function is called inside a class. To the point:
[CODE]
class PHS_editor
{
...
function parse_content( $str
Stut wrote:
Andrei wrote:
Hi list,
I have a class which I use to parse simple bbcode inside some
comments.
I noticed on PHP5 that scope of preg_replace function is changed
when function is called inside a class. To the point:
[CODE]
class PHS_editor
{
...
On Fri, May 18, 2007 4:45 pm, Greg Donald wrote:
Anyone wanna share their insights into the php5 cert test? The php4
test was pretty simple for me, but that was a couple of years ago. It
seems there's quite a bit of new material being covered on the php5
version. I figure with the same
On Sun, May 20, 2007 10:14 am, Danial Rahmanzadeh wrote:
are volcan exams really harder than actual php5 exam as phparch
asserted?
I'm pretty sure after seeing Star Trek: Voyage Home, that Vulcan exams
are MUCH harder than the PHP 5 exam.
--
Some people have a gift link here.
Know what I
are volcan exams really harder than actual php5 exam as phparch asserted?
Actually I found the real exam harder than the test exam. It may have just
been the question set I ended up with, but it was a lot more nitpicky on
details that I rarely use in my work.
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Danial Rahmanzadeh wrote:
are volcan exams really harder than actual php5 exam as
This one time, at band camp, Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone wanna share their insights into the php5 cert test?
As worthless as the php4 cert.
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
--
On 5/19/07, Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As worthless as the php4 cert.
Mine has been very valuable to me, lots more job interviews and
freelance work compared to before I got it.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
Hi all,
I am building an assertType object using static functions. What I want to
keep away from is the following:
code
public static function assertString($para){
return $answer;
};
public static function assertBool($para){
return $answer;
};
...
public static function
Anyone wanna share their insights into the php5 cert test? The php4
test was pretty simple for me, but that was a couple of years ago. It
seems there's quite a bit of new material being covered on the php5
version. I figure with the same number of questions, things had to
get more general if
I've got a cgi file in my cgi-bin folder that I'm calling with include(). It
worked with php4.
My shared host just upgraded to my server to php5.2.0 and the function doesn't work. I can't tell if the problem is a
php5 or server configuration [which may have changed during the upgrade] issue.
On 5/13/07, Al [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a cgi file in my cgi-bin folder that I'm calling with include(). It
worked with php4.
My shared host just upgraded to my server to php5.2.0 and the function doesn't
work. I can't tell if the problem is a
php5 or server configuration [which may
1 - 100 of 583 matches
Mail list logo
