Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-11-26 Thread Friedhelm Betz
Hi Sean, (digging up an old thread, here, but...) bored? ;- Was this the last post in this thread? It's the last one I see in my newsreader. AFAIR yes. There are still a bunch of usernotes indicating PHP_Compat. Did someone do something about this? AFAIR nobody did something about. My vote, i

[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-11-26 Thread Sean Coates
(digging up an old thread, here, but...) Was this the last post in this thread? It's the last one I see in my newsreader. There are still a bunch of usernotes indicating PHP_Compat. Did someone do something about this? S Aidan Lister wrote: That's a valid concern if this was anything other than

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-06-03 Thread Aidan Lister
That's a valid concern if this was anything other than a pear package... I don't think it's advertising, not in the way you mean it. However I think it's clear there is some concern about putting a note on every page... Ultimately I'd have to agree. Stick it in the migration pages as suggested, w

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-06-01 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > Create a FAQ, put it in the migration docs, maybe even > > somewhere within the tutorial, but everywhere is too > > much information. IMHO of course :) > > The full explanation should not be there on all pages. A small portion > of text could be around

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-06-01 Thread Aidan Lister
At the moment you have a zillion user notes, which is worse? :) Having atleast 9 different notes (str_split before I deleted them all) each with their own version of the function, all of which only worked in a couple of situations is definitly unwanted clutter! I think putting some information in

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-06-01 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
I wouldn't have thought that to be an option, but now that you mention it - sure, sounds like a great idea. Would you like me to do it? I'm not sure I have commit access to those pages... I first would like to hear what other people think about, we are not in hurry;-) Fine with me. What's the prop

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-06-01 Thread Philip Olson
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > >>I wouldn't have thought that to be an option, but now that you > >>mention it - sure, sounds like a great idea. > >> > >>Would you like me to do it? I'm not sure I have commit access to > >>those pages... > > > > I first would like to hear what other p

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-05-31 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
I wouldn't have thought that to be an option, but now that you mention it - sure, sounds like a great idea. Would you like me to do it? I'm not sure I have commit access to those pages... I first would like to hear what other people think about, we are not in hurry;-) Fine with me. Goba

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-05-31 Thread Friedhelm Betz
Hi Aidan, > > I wouldn't have thought that to be an option, but now that you > mention it - sure, sounds like a great idea. > > Would you like me to do it? I'm not sure I have commit access to > those pages... I first would like to hear what other people think about, we are not in hurry;-) rega

[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHPDOC] PEAR package PHP_Compat.

2004-05-30 Thread Aidan Lister
Hi Friedhelm, I wouldn't have thought that to be an option, but now that you mention it - sure, sounds like a great idea. Would you like me to do it? I'm not sure I have commit access to those pages... "Friedhelm Betz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > I noticed