On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 09:37:42PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> I think its easier to package just the C version, without the -m32/m64
> switch. Is that ok on 64 bit?
No. On 64 bits, the -m32 switch is needed for the C sources. Otherwise
it won't run on a 64-bit architecture due to the VM pointer
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
>> first. Reading about both, and exploring what I would like to use. I
>> am looking into packaging PicoLisp for OpenBSD ports. I can get
>
> Great!
I think its easier to package just the C version, without the -m32/m64
switch
Hi Amit,
> first. Reading about both, and exploring what I would like to use. I
> am looking into packaging PicoLisp for OpenBSD ports. I can get
Great!
> Is there any plan to add more CPUs or just do it in plain C for 64
> bits in future (C is strictly no-no)? If no plans to add more CPUs
> ri
Hi,
I am new to lisp. Searched for very small dialect and new/pico came up
first. Reading about both, and exploring what I would like to use. I
am looking into packaging PicoLisp for OpenBSD ports. I can get
miniPicoLisp to work, but would like to see the full package, and in
both 32/64 bits & for
