On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:39:53PM +0200, Christophe Gragnic wrote:
does, a 'cleaned URL' to copy/paste on the page.
This sounds indeed like a good idea! It could be put in some prominent
place on each page. What would you recommend?
The Google place is top right, but you have a left
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:56:28PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
I thought to better avoid the hyperlink, and put plain text instead.
Well, perhaps a hyperlink is more clear, and it is not too difficult to
select it. But a major advantage is that you can give it a tooltip.
So, instead of
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi Christophe,
A suggestion for wiki URLs: don't change them but provide, as Google
does, a 'cleaned URL' to copy/paste on the page.
This sounds indeed like a good idea! It could be put in some prominent
place on
On April 23, 2012 at 10:08 AM Thorsten quintf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I knew something was wrong when I pasted the link, since there was a
long discussiion about PicoLisp links here not so long ago - but it was
already quite late when I posted so I did not investigate. Thanks for
the tip.
On April 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi Jakob,
Which is not as it should be. Links should be linkable.
Not necessarily. A login session is by definition an ephemeral
situation, so its momentary state should better not be linkable.
I regard this as
Jakob Eriksson ja...@aurorasystems.eu writes:
On April 23, 2012 at 5:15 PM Thorsten quintf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, it seems that enthusiasm of aficionados of other
(slower?) Lisp dialects is limited, since in no time I had 2 negative
votes and 1 close request. So may be have
Hi List,
out of curiosity I did a little speedtest with PicoLisp and Emacs Lisp
on a 64bit Arch Linux (see
http://picolisp.com/46850/62704437697738713~!wiki?PILvsEL).
The results are quite favorable for PicoLisp - it is about 4 times
faster than interpreted Emacs Lisp and 2 times faster than
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 02:22:21 +0200
Thorsten quintf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi List,
out of curiosity I did a little speedtest with PicoLisp and Emacs Lisp
on a 64bit Arch Linux (see
http://picolisp.com/46850/62704437697738713~!wiki?PILvsEL).
The results are quite favorable for
Hi Thorsten,
out of curiosity I did a little speedtest with PicoLisp and Emacs Lisp
Many thanks for doing this test! And for the extensive description of
how to set it up.
A note about the wiki-link in the mail:
http://picolisp.com/46850/62704437697738713~!wiki?PILvsEL).
It is not a good
