> Hello "Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-)
> You are now subscribed
>
Hello,
I think this mailing list is a very good idea. Will there be an archive of
the postings?
/Jon
picolisp@software-lab.de schrieb:
>> Hello "Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-)
>> You are now subscribed
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> I think this mailing list is a very good idea. Will there be an archive of
> the postings?
Hehe, scream it louder !
Archive , Archive
rob
>
> /Jon
>
Alex .. you should probably remove the the mail adresses in the subject
so i say in the following line you could remove *Name and *From ? right ?!?
(prinl "Subject: " (pack (or *Name *From) ": " *Subject) "^M")
robert
picolisp@software-lab.de schrieb:
> picolisp@software-lab.de schrieb:
>>>
Hi Robert,
> Alex .. you should probably remove the the mail adresses in the subject
> so i say in the following line you could remove *Name and *From ? right ?!?
>
>(prinl "Subject: " (pack (or *Name *From) ": " *Subject) "^M")
I changed this yesterday to another format. Instead of
"Na
> I changed this yesterday to another format. Instead of
>
>"Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Original Subject
>
> I changed it to
>
>Original Subject ["Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
Now I changed it once more.
As the chain of
["Name1" ] ["Name2" ] ...
was getting longer and longer in the
Hi Jon,
nice to see you here! :-)
> I think this mailing list is a very good idea. Will there be an archive of
> the postings?
As you see, this is also the desire of Robert ;-)
Initially, I was planning to maintain an archive for this list. However,
I decided not to do so. This would be a much
> If not, perhaps there is some other means than rolling one's own
> archive? Pipe the whole stuff to master Google?
Perhaps something like:
http://www.mail-archive.com
?
Cheers,
- Alex
Hi,
Yesterday I sent Alex a couple of fixed-point functions, 'floor' and
'ceil', asking if he had any comments. He made me aware that I hadn't
thought of negative input values. Here are my improved versions:
(de floor (X)
(let R (% X 1.0)
(if (lt0 R) (- X R 1.0) (- X R
Hi Jon,
> (de floor (X)
> (let R (% X 1.0)
> (if (lt0 R) (- X R 1.0) (- X R)) ) )
>
> (de ceil (X)
> (let R (% X 1.0)
> (if (gt0 R) (+ (- X R) 1.0) (- X R)) ) )
Looks nice! I don't think there is a substantially better way.
Anybody else ?
Cheers,
- Alex
Hello Anthony Sherbondy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-)
You are now subscribed
Hello Uwe Gruentjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-)
You are now subscribed
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:05:32PM +0100, picolisp@software-lab.de wrote:
> Hello Uwe Gruentjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-)
> You are now subscribed
Hi Uwe! Welcome on board :-)
Cheers,
- Alex
Hello "Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-)
You are now subscribed
13 matches
Mail list logo