Re: Wikipedia

2010-01-04 Thread Alexander Burger
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 10:05:06PM +0100, dexen deVries wrote: > sources', which seems to translate to press, including electronic. Or at le= > ast=20 > a few `high-profile blogs' etc. Best would is something peer-reviewed. OK, my last try is the article in the German magazine c't. I've put a link

Re: Wikipedia

2010-01-04 Thread Jon Kleiser
Cheer up, Alex! Without some of your articles being mentioned on Lambda the Ultimate back in 2007, I would probably not have heard of PicoLisp. I'm glad I got to know it. In my opinion PicoLisp is a shining gem, and by studying it one can learn a lot about different and clever ways to do progr

Re: Wikipedia

2010-01-04 Thread Robert Wörle
Cheers All Here are my 5 cents to this. First about the spelling: The release version is named "picoLisp". So i consider this the correct spelling coming from Alex directly. picolisp.org also uses various types of spellings. 2nd about the wiki people: gtf out of our way. Wikipedia was intende

Re: Wikipedia

2010-01-04 Thread TC
I'm not donating a fucken cent to wikipedia after this. On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Robert Wörle wrote: Cheers All Here are my 5 cents to this. First about the spelling: The release version is named "picoLisp". So i consider this the correct spelling coming from Alex directly. picolisp.org also uses

Re: Wikipedia

2010-01-04 Thread Mateusz Jan Przybylski
On Monday 04 January 2010 14:01:04 you wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 10:05:06PM +0100, dexen deVries wrote: > > sources', which seems to translate to press, including electronic. Or at > > le= ast=20 > > a few `high-profile blogs' etc. Best would is something peer-reviewed. > > OK, my last try