Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of) libraries)

2012-01-22 Thread Randall Dow
I have to agree with Alex here. This language has its place and is very useful in that place. I am currently doing embedded in C, and have no choice about what to use. But I have to say, I in very much in favor of the succinctness of PicoLisp and its ability to link with any library. If someone,

Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of) libraries)

2012-01-22 Thread Yiorgos Adamopoulos
No it is not dead to me. At least I do not want it dead. But in online communities the1-9-90 rule applies: 1% is the major contributors 9% are contributing from time to time 90% are mostly silent (like me) With 70 people on the list the numbers seem appropriate. FWIW, I like PicoLisp the way it

Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of)

2012-01-22 Thread Tamas Herman
im also checking back from time to time. there is a lot to learn from PL. im a long time anti-complexity fan too. i was expressing this attitude of mine in SHell scripts and Rebol so far, but since Rebol has started rotting, im looking for alternatives. (by rotting, i mean the graphical version

Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of) libraries)

2012-01-22 Thread Rudy Hagedorn
Hello. I am new to PL. I come from trying out lots of library paradises where you need to load 100MB of background noise into RAM to print 'hello world' on the screen. My aim is to learn and use lisp for smart small data base driven applications within a little browser window. Yesterday I

Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of) libraries)

2012-01-22 Thread Peter Fischer
Am 22.01.2012 08:42, schrieb Alexander Burger: OK, I understand. The language is not useful or usable, and the Community (I count 70 members in this list) is silent. Hi Alexander! Hm, for an April 1st joke it is too early!? Bad mood day due to ugly wet weather in upper bavaria? ;) Mailing

Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of) libraries)

2012-01-22 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
You may count me as silent but very happy with PicoLisp! I use it mostly for automating tasks in Unix systems (particularly fun in small devices running Linux). J. On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:42:38AM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: OK, I understand. The language is not useful or usable, and

Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of) libraries)

2012-01-22 Thread cle-picolisp
Alexander Burger schrieb: OK, I understand. The language is not useful or usable, and the Community (I count 70 members in this list) is silent. Oh oh ... Alex, your conclusion is not necessary true. If most are silent that has not to mean, they conclude with Henrik. At least me, if I do

Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of) libraries)

2012-01-22 Thread José Romero
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:58:19 -0200 Jeronimo Pellegrini j.pellegr...@randomnode.info wrote: You may count me as silent but very happy with PicoLisp! I use it mostly for automating tasks in Unix systems (particularly fun in small devices running Linux). J. On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at