Re: PicoLisp at Ohloh

2010-01-05 Thread TC



On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Mateusz Jan Przybylski wrote:


On Tuesday 05 January 2010 13:13:14 you wrote:

On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:56:02PM +0100, Mateusz Jan Przybylski wrote:

Ohloh has (experimental, but good enough) support for Mercurial.
As an example, my another favorite project using Mercurial  :

http://www.ohloh.net/p/plan9port

I don't think we can merge the entries. I'd propose to go with the first
one, extend it with link to Google Code and remove (or rename & mark as
inactive) the later one.


If Ohloh has native support for HG, wouldn't it be better abstain from
using Google Code? I feel uneasy with that data octopus.

Cheers,
- Alex



Support for reading from & reporting about projects stored in external
repositories, not hosting them.

For example this neat statistic:
https://www.ohloh.net/articles/php_eats_rails

Given that Ohloh is owned by SourceForge (since this year), I don't see it
providing *separate* repository hosting anytime near soon...


Personally, I prefer googlecode instead of sourceforge.
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe


Re: PicoLisp at Ohloh

2010-01-05 Thread Mateusz Jan Przybylski
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 13:13:14 you wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:56:02PM +0100, Mateusz Jan Przybylski wrote:
> > Ohloh has (experimental, but good enough) support for Mercurial.
> > As an example, my another favorite project using Mercurial  :
> >
> > http://www.ohloh.net/p/plan9port
> >
> > I don't think we can merge the entries. I'd propose to go with the first
> > one, extend it with link to Google Code and remove (or rename & mark as
> > inactive) the later one.
> 
> If Ohloh has native support for HG, wouldn't it be better abstain from
> using Google Code? I feel uneasy with that data octopus.
> 
> Cheers,
> - Alex
> 

Support for reading from & reporting about projects stored in external 
repositories, not hosting them.

For example this neat statistic:
https://www.ohloh.net/articles/php_eats_rails

Given that Ohloh is owned by SourceForge (since this year), I don't see it 
providing *separate* repository hosting anytime near soon...

Regards,
--
dexen
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe


Re: PicoLisp at Ohloh

2010-01-05 Thread Alexander Burger
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:56:02PM +0100, Mateusz Jan Przybylski wrote:
> Ohloh has (experimental, but good enough) support for Mercurial.
> As an example, my another favorite project using Mercurial:
> 
> http://www.ohloh.net/p/plan9port
> 
> I don't think we can merge the entries. I'd propose to go with the first one, 
> extend it with link to Google Code and remove (or rename & mark as inactive) 
> the later one.

If Ohloh has native support for HG, wouldn't it be better abstain from
using Google Code? I feel uneasy with that data octopus.

Cheers,
- Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe


Re: PicoLisp at Ohloh

2010-01-05 Thread Mateusz Jan Przybylski
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 12:34:24 you wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Alexander Burger wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:15:58AM +0100, Mateusz Jan Przybylski wrote:
> >> https://www.ohloh.net/p/PicoLisp
> >> https://www.ohloh.net/p/429332
> >> The former points to Software Lab's website, the later points to Google
> >> Code project; both are indeed the same projects.
> >>
> >> How do we proceed?
> >
> > I wouldn't mind to register once more. Then perhaps the one with Google
> > Code is better? Can you unify the pages somehow? TC: What do you think?
> 
> Well.. the googlecode site is just a repository. In the other hand, oloh
>  seems more social and to be honest, I have never heard of it before. BUT,
>  oloh works with CVS, SVN and Git _only_ (and you already know what I think
>  of those version control systems...)
> 
> In any case, these sites have a very tight integration with version control
>  systems, so it's pointless to use them unless we have real source control
>  management. Throwing massive changes per commit to a repository doesn't
>  work.. at all, it just makes stuff hard to track, and merge, and history
>  is useless.


Ohloh has (experimental, but good enough) support for Mercurial.
As an example, my another favorite project using Mercurial  :

http://www.ohloh.net/p/plan9port

I don't think we can merge the entries. I'd propose to go with the first one, 
extend it with link to Google Code and remove (or rename & mark as inactive) 
the later one.
This obviously is a shameless self-plug, since I started the first Ohloh PL 
entry ;)

Regards,
--
dexen
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe


Re: PicoLisp at Ohloh

2010-01-05 Thread TC

On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Alexander Burger wrote:

On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:15:58AM +0100, Mateusz Jan Przybylski wrote:

https://www.ohloh.net/p/PicoLisp
https://www.ohloh.net/p/429332
The former points to Software Lab's website, the later points to Google Code
project; both are indeed the same projects.

How do we proceed?


I wouldn't mind to register once more. Then perhaps the one with Google
Code is better? Can you unify the pages somehow? TC: What do you think?


Well.. the googlecode site is just a repository. In the other hand, oloh seems 
more social and to be honest, I have never heard of it before. BUT, oloh works 
with CVS, SVN and Git _only_ (and you already know what I think of those 
version control systems...)

In any case, these sites have a very tight integration with version control 
systems, so it's pointless to use them unless we have real source control 
management. Throwing massive changes per commit to a repository doesn't work.. 
at all, it just makes stuff hard to track, and merge, and history is useless.
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe


Re: PicoLisp at Ohloh

2010-01-05 Thread Alexander Burger
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:15:58AM +0100, Mateusz Jan Przybylski wrote:
> https://www.ohloh.net/p/PicoLisp
> https://www.ohloh.net/p/429332
> The former points to Software Lab's website, the later points to Google Code 
> project; both are indeed the same projects.
> 
> How do we proceed?

I wouldn't mind to register once more. Then perhaps the one with Google
Code is better? Can you unify the pages somehow? TC: What do you think?

Cheers,
- Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe


PicoLisp at Ohloh

2010-01-05 Thread Mateusz Jan Przybylski
Oops,

there are two PicoLisp project on Ohloh:
https://www.ohloh.net/p/PicoLisp
https://www.ohloh.net/p/429332
The former points to Software Lab's website, the later points to Google Code 
project; both are indeed the same projects.

How do we proceed?

Regards,
--
dexen
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe